Suppr超能文献

欢迎宗教:宗教与全球生物伦理学的多元普遍主义方法。

Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics.

作者信息

Jecker N S, Atuire C A, Ravitsky V, Ghaly M, Vaswani V, Voo T C

机构信息

African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Centre for Bioethics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):381-394. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10410-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.

Abstract

This paper sets forth and defends a pluriversal approach to religion in the context of an increasingly global bioethics. Section I introduces a pluriversal view as a normative technique for engaging across difference. A normative pluriversal approach sets five constraints: civility, change from within, justice, non-domination, and tolerance. Section II applies a pluriversal approach to religion. It argues that this approach is epistemically just, recognizes diverse standpoints, and represents a productive, preferred, way to tackle global bioethics concerns. Section II also considers an opposing viewpoint, which holds that religious perspectives have no place in bioethics. We show that this viewpoint would have adverse effects on bioethics publishing, conferencing, and training programmes. The paper concludes (in Section III) that bioethicists should engage with people who hold different worldviews, including religious worldviews, and should do so in accordance with pluriversal ethical constraints.

摘要

本文在日益全球化的生物伦理学背景下提出并捍卫一种关于宗教的多元普遍主义方法。第一部分介绍多元普遍主义观点,将其作为一种跨越差异进行交流的规范性技术。规范性多元普遍主义方法设定了五个限制条件:文明、内部变革、正义、非支配和宽容。第二部分将多元普遍主义方法应用于宗教。它认为这种方法在认知上是公正的,承认不同的观点,并且是处理全球生物伦理学问题的一种有效、可取的方式。第二部分还考虑了一种相反的观点,即认为宗教观点在生物伦理学中没有立足之地。我们表明,这种观点会对生物伦理学的出版、会议和培训项目产生不利影响。本文(在第三部分)得出结论,生物伦理学家应该与持有不同世界观的人进行交流,包括宗教世界观,并且应该按照多元普遍的伦理限制来这样做。

相似文献

1
Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics.
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):381-394. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10410-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
On Religious Influence in Bioethics: The Limits of Pluriversalism.
Bioethics. 2025 Jul;39(6):620-629. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13419. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
4
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;2015(2):CD007989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007989.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
On Religious Influence in Bioethics: The Limits of Pluriversalism.
Bioethics. 2025 Jul;39(6):620-629. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13419. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Justice Before Pluriversality-A Response to Jecker et al.
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):457-462. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10444-5. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Christian anthropology-based contributions to the ethics of socially assistive robots in care for older adults.
Bioethics. 2024 Nov;38(9):787-795. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13322. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Two Models of Bioethics.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):37-38. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2312765. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
It is Not Too Late for Reconciliation Between Israel and Palestine, Even in the Darkest Hour.
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Mar;21(1):29-45. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10347-x. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Jewish Ethics of Inmate Vaccines Against COVID-19.
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Mar;21(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10331-x. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
5
Applying the Concepts of Benefit and Harm in Malaysian Bioethical Discourse: Analysis of Malaysian Fatwa.
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Sep;21(3):401-414. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10345-z. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):13-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2232748. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
Religious pluralism and the ethics of healthcare.
Bioethics. 2023 Jan;37(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13113. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
10
Religious preferences in healthcare: A welfarist approach.
Bioethics. 2023 Jan;37(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13114. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验