• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者食管裂孔疝修补术后的发病率和死亡率:多中心研究网络研究。

Morbidity and mortality following hiatal hernia repair in geriatric patients: a multicenter research network study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1100 Walnut Street, 5th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3999-4005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10956-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10956-y
PMID:38858249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11219371/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia is a common surgical pathology. Such hernias can be found incidentally and patients may opt for an initial nonoperative approach though many will pursue surgery after symptom progression. Data on the effects of age on the outcomes of hiatal hernia repair may help inform this decision-making process.

METHODS

The TriNetX database was queried for all adult patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair from 2000 to 2023. Patients were divided into elective and emergent cohorts on the basis of diagnosis codes indicating obstruction or gangrene. Patients aged 80-89 were compared against those aged 65-79 in unadjusted analysis. Logistic regression models controlling for additional health history covariates were created to calculate odds ratios for primary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 2310 octogenarians and 15,295 seniors who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair, and 406 octogenarians and 1462 seniors who underwent emergent repair during the study period. The vast majority of patients in both groups underwent minimally invasive operations. In the elective cohort, octogenarians had higher rates of mortality, malnutrition, sepsis, respiratory failure, pneumonia, DVT, blood transfusion, and discharge to nursing facility. In the emergent cohort, octogenarians had higher rates of mortality, malnutrition, sepsis, and respiratory failure. The odds ratios for mortality in the elective and emergent cohorts were 3.9 (95% CI 3.1-5.0) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.1-5.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians are at a meaningfully increased risk for mortality and morbidity after both elective and emergent hiatal hernia repair compared to senior-aged patients. Greater consideration should be given to surgical repair prior to the 8th decade of life.

摘要

背景

食管裂孔疝是一种常见的外科病理学。这种疝可以偶然发现,患者可能选择初始非手术方法,尽管许多患者在症状进展后会选择手术。关于年龄对食管裂孔疝修补术结果的影响的数据可能有助于为这一决策过程提供信息。

方法

从 2000 年到 2023 年,使用 TriNetX 数据库查询所有接受食管裂孔疝修补术的成年患者。根据提示梗阻或坏疽的诊断代码,患者被分为择期和紧急两组。在未调整分析中,将 80-89 岁的患者与 65-79 岁的患者进行比较。创建了包含其他健康史协变量的逻辑回归模型,以计算主要结局的优势比。

结果

在研究期间,有 2310 名 80 岁以上的患者和 15295 名 65-79 岁的患者接受了择期食管裂孔疝修补术,有 406 名 80 岁以上的患者和 1462 名 65-79 岁的患者接受了紧急修补术。这两组患者绝大多数都接受了微创手术。在择期组中,80 岁以上患者的死亡率、营养不良、脓毒症、呼吸衰竭、肺炎、深静脉血栓形成、输血和转至护理院的比例更高。在紧急组中,80 岁以上患者的死亡率、营养不良、脓毒症和呼吸衰竭的比例更高。择期和紧急两组的死亡率优势比分别为 3.9(95%CI 3.1-5.0)和 3.5(95%CI 2.1-5.6)。

结论

与 65-79 岁的老年患者相比,80 岁以上的患者在择期和紧急食管裂孔疝修补术后的死亡和发病风险显著增加。在 80 岁之前,应该更认真地考虑手术修复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/372807626d29/464_2024_10956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/39520b10e32a/464_2024_10956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/f9dbb0b06382/464_2024_10956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/372807626d29/464_2024_10956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/39520b10e32a/464_2024_10956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/f9dbb0b06382/464_2024_10956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0c9/11219371/372807626d29/464_2024_10956_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Morbidity and mortality following hiatal hernia repair in geriatric patients: a multicenter research network study.老年患者食管裂孔疝修补术后的发病率和死亡率:多中心研究网络研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3999-4005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10956-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Holding Up at 80: Feasibility and Safety of Elective Type IV Hiatal Hernia Repair in Octogenarians.八十岁老人的手术:八十岁患者择期IV型食管裂孔疝修补术的可行性与安全性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Jul;35(7):538-541. doi: 10.1089/lap.2025.0017. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Treatment of paraesophageal hiatal hernia in octogenarians: a systematic review and retrospective cohort study.八旬老人食管旁裂孔疝的治疗:一项系统评价和回顾性队列研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jul 1;31(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy010.
4
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
5
Definitive, urgent repair of acutely incarcerated paraesophageal hernias is comparable to an elective repair.对急性嵌顿性食管旁疝进行确切、紧急的修复与择期修复效果相当。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4558-4563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11847-6. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
6
Restoration of normal anatomy without fundoplication in non-elective incarcerated giant paraesophageal hernia repair.非择期嵌顿性巨大食管旁疝修补术中不进行胃底折叠术恢复正常解剖结构
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):6102-6107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11924-w. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
8
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
9
Elective versus non-elective surgery in the treatment of giant paraoesophageal hiatal hernia.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug;103(8):800126. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800126. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
10
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrathoracic Gastric Perforation Secondary to Strangulated Recurrent Hiatal Hernia: A Case Report of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.绞窄性复发性食管裂孔疝继发胸内胃穿孔:诊断与治疗挑战的病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85750. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85750. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Validation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with paraoesophageal hernias undergoing robotic repair.用于接受机器人修复的食管旁疝患者的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器的验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11886-z.
3
Safety and Early Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia in Octogenarians.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Workup and Therapeutic Intervention of Hiatal Hernias Discovered as Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography.在计算机断层扫描检查中偶然发现的食管裂孔疝的诊断方法和治疗干预。
Am Surg. 2024 Jun;90(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1177/00031348241230096. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
2
The effect of frailty and age on outcomes in elective paraesophageal hernia repair.虚弱和年龄对择期食管旁疝修补术预后的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9514-9522. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10363-9. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Defining surgical risk in octogenarians undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair.
八旬老人巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的安全性及早期临床结局
World J Surg. 2025 May;49(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12569. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
定义 80 岁以上行食管裂孔疝修补术患者的手术风险。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8644-8654. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10270-z. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia: recommendations following a European expert Delphi consensus.食管裂孔旁疝的管理:欧洲专家 Delphi 共识后的建议。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4555-4565. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09933-8. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Defining risk factors for mortality after emergent hiatal hernia repair in the era of minimally invasive surgery.定义微创时代急诊食管裂孔疝修补术后死亡率的危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jun;225(6):1056-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Watchful waiting versus elective repair for asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias: A cost-effectiveness analysis.观察等待与择期修复无症状和轻度症状食管裂孔疝的成本效益分析。
Am J Surg. 2018 Oct;216(4):760-763. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair?无症状食管裂孔疝的处理方法:密切观察还是择期腹腔镜疝修补术?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):864-871. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5755-y. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the USA: Trends of Utilization Stratified by Surgical Volume and Consequent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes.美国食管旁疝修补术:按手术量分层的使用趋势及其对围手术期结局的影响
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Aug;21(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3469-z. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.食管裂孔疝管理指南。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4409-28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA: ITS UNSUSPECTED FREQUENCY: ITS DIAGNOSIS: TECHNIC FOR RADICAL CURE.
Ann Surg. 1919 Mar;69(3):254-70. doi: 10.1097/00000658-191903000-00005.