• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对急性嵌顿性食管旁疝进行确切、紧急的修复与择期修复效果相当。

Definitive, urgent repair of acutely incarcerated paraesophageal hernias is comparable to an elective repair.

作者信息

Pather Keouna, Dowdall Ryan, Mobley Erin M, Sacco Jana, Puri Ruchir

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 653 West 8th St, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4558-4563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11847-6. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11847-6
PMID:40490576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergent repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is rare. This study aimed to compare outcomes of elective and urgent PEH repairs in patients with type II-IV PEHs.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of type II-IV PEHs from February 2014 to April 2024. The operations were classified as elective or urgent. Indications for urgent repair included acute incarceration and/or gastric outlet obstruction, which required immediate NGT decompression and/or EGD followed by definitive repair during the same hospital admission. Outcomes were 90-day hernia recurrence, mortality, readmission, and reoperation. Significant associations between operative cohort and outcomes were evaluated using univariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included (female: 82%, median age: 64 years, ASA III: 57%). Type III PEH was most frequent (n = 116, 56%), followed by type IV (n = 64, 31%). There were 21 patients included in the urgent cohort. Of these, gastric decompression was performed via EGD in 16 patients (76%) and only NGT placement in two patients (10%). The median time to definitive repair was 6 [IQR 1.0-13.5] days. Laparoscopic (n = 126, 61%) and robotic (n = 75, 36%) approaches were similar between the elective and urgent cohorts (p = 0.70). Nissen fundoplication (n = 108, 52%) was the most common anti-reflux operation performed. The median length of stay (3 vs 4 days, p = 0.10) and hernia recurrence (n = 3 vs n = 1, p = 0.32) were comparable between the cohorts. There was one mortality in the urgent cohort secondary to a respiratory complication. Reoperations occurred in four patients, all in the elective cohort for gastric perforation, ischemic Roux limb, and early postoperative recurrence (n = 2). Readmissions included 18 (10%) and 3 patients (14%) from the elective and urgent cohorts, respectively (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Acutely incarcerated PEHs are infrequent and require immediate gastric decompression. In stable patients, definitive urgent MIS repair can be performed safely during the same admission, with low risk of postoperative complications or recurrence, comparable to elective operations.

摘要

背景

食管旁疝(PEH)的急诊修复很少见。本研究旨在比较II-IV型PEH患者择期和急诊修复的结果。

方法

这是一项对2014年2月至2024年4月期间II-IV型PEH患者的单中心回顾性研究。手术分为择期或急诊。急诊修复的指征包括急性嵌顿和/或胃出口梗阻,这需要立即进行鼻胃管减压和/或上消化道内镜检查(EGD),随后在同一住院期间进行确定性修复。结果指标为90天疝复发、死亡率、再入院率和再次手术率。使用单变量逻辑回归评估手术队列与结果之间的显著关联。

结果

共纳入207例患者(女性:82%,中位年龄:64岁,美国麻醉医师协会III级:57%)。III型PEH最常见(n = 116,56%),其次是IV型(n = 64,31%)。急诊队列中有21例患者。其中,16例患者(76%)通过EGD进行胃减压,仅2例患者(10%)放置鼻胃管。确定性修复的中位时间为6天[四分位间距1.0 - 13.5天]。择期和急诊队列中腹腔镜手术(n = 126,61%)和机器人手术(n = 75,36%)的比例相似(p = 0.70)。Nissen胃底折叠术(n = 108,52%)是最常见的抗反流手术。队列之间的中位住院时间(3天对4天,p = 0.10)和疝复发率(n = 3对n = 1,p = 0.32)相当。急诊队列中有1例因呼吸并发症死亡。4例患者进行了再次手术,均在择期队列中,原因是胃穿孔、Roux袢缺血和术后早期复发(n = 2)。择期和急诊队列的再入院率分别为患者的18例(10%)和3例(14%)(p = 0.55)。

结论

急性嵌顿性PEH很少见,需要立即进行胃减压。对于病情稳定的患者,在同一住院期间可以安全地进行确定性急诊微创手术修复,术后并发症或复发风险低,与择期手术相当。

相似文献

1
Definitive, urgent repair of acutely incarcerated paraesophageal hernias is comparable to an elective repair.对急性嵌顿性食管旁疝进行确切、紧急的修复与择期修复效果相当。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4558-4563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11847-6. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Paraesophageal hernia repair with concurrent bariatric surgery: a single institution experience on safety, benefit, and outcomes in obese patients.食管旁疝修补术联合减重手术:单机构对肥胖患者安全性、益处及结局的经验
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4564-4575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11812-3. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
3
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
4
Treatment of paraesophageal hiatal hernia in octogenarians: a systematic review and retrospective cohort study.八旬老人食管旁裂孔疝的治疗:一项系统评价和回顾性队列研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jul 1;31(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy010.
5
Paraesophageal hernia repair combined with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces short-term hernia recurrence with added metabolic benefit in patients with BMI ≥ 35: A 15-year experience.食管旁疝修补术联合Roux-en-Y胃旁路术可降低BMI≥35患者的短期疝复发率,并带来额外的代谢益处:15年经验总结
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11950-8.
6
Systemic and local collagen turnover in hernia patients.疝气患者的全身和局部胶原蛋白更新情况。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
7
Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review.机器人辅助食管旁疝修补术:单中心经验及系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):81-86. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
9
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
10
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.

本文引用的文献

1
Interval operative management in patients admitted with acute obstruction due to incarcerated paraesophageal hernia.因食管裂孔疝嵌顿导致急性梗阻而入院患者的手术间隔期处理。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5651-5656. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11157-3. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center.高容量转诊中心择期和急诊巨大食管裂孔疝修补术的现代外科治疗结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Acute Vs. Elective Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Endoscopic Gastric Decompression Allows Semi-Elective Surgery in a Majority of Acute Patients.
急性 vs. 择期食管裂孔疝修补术:大多数急性患者行内镜下胃减压后可进行半择期手术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3495-x. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Elective or Emergency Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.择期或急诊食管旁疝修补术相关的发病率和死亡率
JAMA Surg. 2015 Nov;150(11):1094-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1867.
5
"Acute intrathoracic stomach!" How should we deal with complicated type IV paraesophageal hernias?“急性胸腔内胃!”我们应如何处理复杂的IV型食管旁疝?
Hernia. 2015 Aug;19(4):627-33. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1285-x. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
6
A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.使用全国住院患者样本对急诊与择期食管旁疝修补术进行的基于人群的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3473-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3626-3. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
Management of large para-esophageal hiatal hernias.大裂孔食管旁疝的治疗。
J Visc Surg. 2013 Dec;150(6):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes.仅行复苏等待:急性表现的食管裂孔疝行早期手术可获得更好的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2436-8. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
9
A population-based analysis of emergent vs. elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach.基于人群的分析显示,胸腔内胃需要急诊入院还是择期入院。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1250-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0755-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?食管旁疝:手术还是观察?
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):492-500; discussion 500-1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012.