• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于接受机器人修复的食管旁疝患者的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器的验证

Validation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with paraoesophageal hernias undergoing robotic repair.

作者信息

Taylor Jordan, Arias-Espinosa Luis, McGeoch Catherine, Shah Vaishali, Shyu Ethan, Shahi Niti, Rodier Simon, Kaplan Brian, Malcher Flavio, Damani Tanuja

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1Th Ave, New York City, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11886-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11886-z
PMID:40576773
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) American College of Surgeons (ACS) risk calculator is a validated method of predicting postoperative complications that was recently updated to a machine-learning structure. The objective of this study was to measure the accuracy of this calculator in our institution on paraoesophageal hernia (PEH) repair.

METHOD

Procedures performed between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively collected regarding demographics, operative variables, and outcomes with a 30-day follow-up. Thirteen outcomes measured by NSQIP-ACS calculator were measured. Observed and predicted rates were compared by receiver operating curves (ROC) and length of stay was compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 203 paraoesophageal hernia repairs on patients with a median age of 68 (IQR 61-75) and 70.9% (n = 144) predominantly female. The size of the paraoesophageal hernia (PEH) was large or giant in 59.1% (n = 120) and mesh was placed in 70.4% (n = 143). The predicted risk was consistently higher than observed events on all but discharge destinations. Eight outcomes had no event to measure; however, the calculator accurately predicted a risk of ≤ 1% on all of these. The area under the curve (AUC) was fair (0.6-0.79) on discharge to nursing or rehabilitation facilities and failed in the rest of the measurable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator correctly predicted a low occurrence of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic paraoesophageal hernia repair.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会(ACS)国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)风险计算器是一种经过验证的预测术后并发症的方法,最近已更新为机器学习结构。本研究的目的是评估该计算器在我们机构中对食管旁疝(PEH)修复的预测准确性。

方法

回顾性收集2019年至2023年间进行的手术的人口统计学、手术变量和30天随访结果。测量了NSQIP-ACS计算器所测量的13项结果。通过受试者工作曲线(ROC)比较观察到的和预测的发生率,并通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较住院时间。

结果

共对203例食管旁疝进行了修复,患者中位年龄为68岁(四分位间距61-75岁),70.9%(n = 144)为女性。59.1%(n = 120)的食管旁疝(PEH)为大疝或巨大疝,70.4%(n = 143)放置了补片。除出院目的地外,预测风险始终高于观察到的事件。八项结果无事件可测量;然而,计算器准确预测所有这些结果的风险均≤1%。在出院到护理或康复机构方面,曲线下面积(AUC)为中等(0.6-0.79),在其余可测量结果中未达预期。

结论

ACS-NSQIP风险计算器正确预测了接受机器人食管旁疝修复术患者术后低发生率的结果。

相似文献

1
Validation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with paraoesophageal hernias undergoing robotic repair.用于接受机器人修复的食管旁疝患者的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器的验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11886-z.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Paraesophageal hernia repair combined with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces short-term hernia recurrence with added metabolic benefit in patients with BMI ≥ 35: A 15-year experience.食管旁疝修补术联合Roux-en-Y胃旁路术可降低BMI≥35患者的短期疝复发率,并带来额外的代谢益处:15年经验总结
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11950-8.
6
Holding Up at 80: Feasibility and Safety of Elective Type IV Hiatal Hernia Repair in Octogenarians.八十岁老人的手术:八十岁患者择期IV型食管裂孔疝修补术的可行性与安全性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Jul;35(7):538-541. doi: 10.1089/lap.2025.0017. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
7
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝修补术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1879-1890. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01636-5. Epub 2023 May 29.
9
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
10
Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review.机器人辅助食管旁疝修补术:单中心经验及系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):81-86. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of the Current Trends and Future Perspectives of Robots in Colorectal Surgery: What Have We Got Ourselves Into?结直肠手术中机器人技术的当前趋势与未来展望综述:我们将自己带入了怎样的境地?
Cureus. 2025 Jan 20;17(1):e77690. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77690. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜抗反流手术及食管旁疝修补术的回顾性成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7179-7186. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11294-9. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.
机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的围手术期结局:NSQIP 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5851-5857. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11158-2. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes.机器人技术与腹腔镜技术在食管裂孔疝和裂孔旁疝修补术中的对比分析:当前证据与结果的综述。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1559-1569. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Head-to-Head Comparison: P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP in Predicting Perioperative Risk in Robotic Surgery for Gynaecological Cancers.头对头比较:P-POSSUM和ACS-NSQIP在预测妇科癌症机器人手术围手术期风险中的应用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;16(13):2297. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132297.
6
Morbidity and mortality following hiatal hernia repair in geriatric patients: a multicenter research network study.老年患者食管裂孔疝修补术后的发病率和死亡率:多中心研究网络研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3999-4005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10956-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing common bile duct exploration.评估接受胆总管探查术患者的 ACS NSQIP 手术风险计算器。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Dec 18;409(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03207-6.
8
Pulmonary hypertension associated mortality in the United States from 2003 to 2020: an observational analysis of time trends and disparities.2003年至2020年美国肺动脉高压相关死亡率:时间趋势和差异的观察性分析
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):3256-3272. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1468. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
American College of Surgeons NSQIP Risk Calculator Accuracy Using a Machine Learning Algorithm Compared with Regression.与回归法相比,使用机器学习算法的美国外科医师学会NSQIP风险计算器的准确性
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 May 1;236(5):1024-1030. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000556. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
The Impact of Age and Need for Emergent Surgery in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Outcomes.年龄和紧急手术需求对食管裂孔疝修补术结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul;116(1):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 23.