• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧唇腭裂患者鼻美学参数评估——一项回顾性研究

Assessment of Nasal Aesthetic Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Anishya Daphane, Nagesh Shweta

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Sep;62(9):1496-1503. doi: 10.1177/10556656241261908. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1177/10556656241261908
PMID:38860313
Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess and compare the deviating nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with a control group. The study also aims to correlate the deviating cephalometric parameters with two aesthetic scoring systems.DesignA retrospective study.SettingDental college and hospital.ParticipantsPre-treatment lateral cephalograms and extra oral photographs of 20 adult patients with repaired UCLP presenting for orthodontic treatment. 20 patients with age and type of malocclusion matched control were selected.Main OutcomeThe nasal cephalometric parameters of patients with UCLP and a control group were compared. The nasolabial region of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) was scored using Asher McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) and Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS). The scoring was done by six different groups assessors to study their perception of the nasolabial region. Correlation between cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic scores was done.ResultsThe study found significant differences in nasal length ( = .003) and depth ( < .001) between UCLP and the non-cleft control group. In the aesthetic assessment, orthodontist gave the least scores, while layman group scored the highest. The CARS nose aesthetic scores showed statistically significant high, negative correlation with the nasal length ( = .01).ConclusionThe cephalometric parameters and the aesthetic indices can be aid the orthodontists in the assessment of nasolabial aesthetics and additionally refer for further definitive rhinoplasty to improve the patient's overall facial aesthetics.

摘要

目的

评估并比较单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者与对照组的鼻骨测量参数偏差。本研究还旨在将测量参数偏差与两种美学评分系统相关联。

设计

一项回顾性研究。

地点

牙科学院及医院。

参与者

20例接受正畸治疗的成年单侧唇腭裂修复患者治疗前的侧位头影测量片和口外照片。选取20例年龄和错颌类型匹配的对照患者。

主要结果

比较单侧唇腭裂患者与对照组的鼻骨测量参数。使用阿舍·麦克达德美学指数(AMAI)和腭裂美学评分量表(CARS)对唇腭裂(CLP)患者的鼻唇区域进行评分。评分由六个不同的评估小组进行,以研究他们对鼻唇区域的看法。对头影测量参数与美学评分之间进行相关性分析。

结果

研究发现,单侧唇腭裂组与非腭裂对照组在鼻长度(P = 0.003)和深度(P < 0.001)上存在显著差异。在美学评估中,正畸医生给出的分数最低,而外行组给出的分数最高。CARS鼻美学评分与鼻长度呈统计学上显著的高度负相关(P = 0.01)。

结论

头影测量参数和美学指数可帮助正畸医生评估鼻唇美学,并另外推荐进一步的确定性鼻整形手术,以改善患者的整体面部美学。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Nasal Aesthetic Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - A Retrospective Study.单侧唇腭裂患者鼻美学参数评估——一项回顾性研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Sep;62(9):1496-1503. doi: 10.1177/10556656241261908. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Nasolabial shape and aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.唇腭裂患者的鼻唇形态与美学:三维面部图像分析
Eur J Orthod. 2025 Jun 12;47(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf051.
3
A Longitudinal Investigation of Nasolabial Changes With and Without Revision Surgery in Patients with Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者行与不行修复手术时鼻唇变化的纵向研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Aug;62(8):1376-1384. doi: 10.1177/10556656241256706. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Indiacran: An Inter-Center Study of Nasolabial Esthetics Outcomes in Patients With Repaired Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Jun 30:10556656251352604. doi: 10.1177/10556656251352604.
5
Comparative evaluation of nasolabial appearance of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by professional, patient and layperson using 2 aesthetic scoring systems: A cross sectional study.两种美学评分系统评估单侧唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观的比较:一项横断面研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Nov;26(4):660-666. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12663. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
6
Outcomes in facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery: a systematic review.唇腭裂手术中面部美学的结果:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Sep;65(9):1233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 May 15.
7
Effectiveness of nasoalveolar molding treatment for babies with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.鼻牙槽塑形治疗对非综合征性完全性单侧唇腭裂婴儿的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.012.
8
Impact of primary palatoplasty on the maxillomandibular sagittal relationship in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一期腭裂修复术对单侧唇腭裂患者上下颌矢状关系的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;44(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
9
Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: A comparison of aesthetics using two scoring systems: A cross-sectional study.单侧唇腭裂患者的鼻唇外观:使用两种评分系统的美学比较:一项横断面研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Feb;26(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12576. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
10
Long-Term Three-Dimensional Morphometric Outcome Study of Nasal Bone in Cleft Patients.腭裂患者鼻骨的长期三维形态测量结果研究
J Craniofac Surg. 2025 May 1;36(3):847-849. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010684. Epub 2024 Sep 26.