文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤治疗的临床共识:双盲 Delphi 小组。

Clinical consensus on treatments for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: double-blinded Delphi panel.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2024;20(23):1645-1656. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2342228. Epub 2024 May 20.


DOI:10.1080/14796694.2024.2342228
PMID:38861282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11485956/
Abstract

Obtain clinical consensus on factors impacting first-line prescribing for transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). A double-blinded, modified Delphi panel was employed. USA-based hematologists/oncologists who treat TIE patients with NDMM were selected as expert panelists. Consensus was reached that patient frailty, performance status, comorbidities, treatment efficacy, and adverse event profile affect first-line prescribing. All panelists agreed it is important to use the most efficacious treatment first; 88% of panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious. Panelists agreed treatment should be continued until progression while benefits outweigh risk. Findings reinforce the importance of using the most efficacious regimen upfront for TIE NDMM, and nearly all panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious treatment.

摘要

就影响新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)移植不合格(TIE)患者一线治疗选择的因素达成临床共识。采用双盲、改良 Delphi 小组法。选择治疗 TIE 合并 NDMM 的美国血液科医生/肿瘤学家作为专家小组成员。专家小组一致认为,患者虚弱、体能状态、合并症、治疗效果和不良事件谱影响一线治疗选择。所有小组成员均同意首先使用最有效的治疗方法非常重要;88%的小组成员认为包含达雷妥尤单抗的方案最有效。小组成员一致认为,只要获益大于风险,就应继续治疗直至疾病进展。研究结果强调了为 TIE NDMM 患者一线使用最有效的方案的重要性,几乎所有小组成员均认为包含达雷妥尤单抗的方案是最有效的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9425/11485956/2b4823284469/IFON_A_2342228_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9425/11485956/c2b6964e5bd6/IFON_A_2342228_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9425/11485956/2b4823284469/IFON_A_2342228_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9425/11485956/c2b6964e5bd6/IFON_A_2342228_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9425/11485956/2b4823284469/IFON_A_2342228_F0002_C.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Clinical consensus on treatments for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: double-blinded Delphi panel.

Future Oncol. 2024

[2]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[3]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[4]
Stem Cell Mobilization Yields with Daratumumab (Dara) and Lenalidomide (Len)-Containing Quadruplet Induction Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): A Real-World Experience at 2 Institutes.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025-8

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Health Technol Assess. 2006-9

[6]
Global Delphi consensus on treatment goals for generalized pustular psoriasis.

Br J Dermatol. 2025-3-18

[7]
Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and followed by daratumumab maintenance or observation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2024-8

[8]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[9]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[10]
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison of Progression-Free Survival with D-Rd and VRd Based on MAIA and SWOG S0777 Individual Patient-Level Data.

Adv Ther. 2024-5

[2]
Expert Consensus on the Incorporation of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Into the Management of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023-11

[3]
Impact of Treatment Sequencing on Overall Survival in Patients with Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.

Oncologist. 2023-5-8

[4]
Immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Front Immunol. 2022

[5]
Network meta-analysis of randomized trials in multiple myeloma: Efficacy and safety in frontline therapy for patients not eligible for transplant.

Hematol Oncol. 2022-12

[6]
Response rates and minimal residual disease outcomes as potential surrogates for progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

PLoS One. 2022

[7]
Treatment Regimens for Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Adv Ther. 2022-5

[8]
Current approaches to management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Am J Hematol. 2022-5

[9]
MRD end point in myeloma: ready for prime time?

Blood. 2022-2-10

[10]
Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: frailty subgroup analysis of MAIA.

Leukemia. 2022-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索