• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 DPP4 抑制剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的新发肝细胞癌风险较低。

Lower Risks of New-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors.

机构信息

1Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

2Diabetes Research Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, PowerHealth Research Institute, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Jun;22(2 D). doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118
PMID:38862004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The association between risk of developing HCC and treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) is currently unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of new-onset HCC in patients treated with SGLT2i versus DPP4i.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with T2DM in Hong Kong receiving either SGLT2i or DPP4i between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patients with concurrent DPP4i and SGLT2i use were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was performed by using the nearest neighbor search. Multivariable Cox regression was applied to identify significant predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 62,699 patients were included (SGLT2i, n=22,154; DPP4i, n=40,545). After matching (n=44,308), 166 patients (0.37%) developed HCC: 36 in the SGLT2i group and 130 in the DPP4i group over 240,269 person-years. Overall, SGLT2i use was associated with lower risks of HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79) compared with DPP4i after adjustments. The association between SGLT2i and HCC development remained significant in patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.41), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80). The results were consistent in different risk models, propensity score approaches, and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of HCC compared with DPP4i use after adjustments, and in the context of cirrhosis, advanced fibrosis, HBV infection, and HCV infection.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)可能是肝细胞癌(HCC)发展的一个风险因素。目前尚不清楚使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP4i)治疗与 HCC 发病风险之间的关系。本研究旨在比较 SGLT2i 与 DPP4i 治疗的患者新发 HCC 的风险。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在香港接受 SGLT2i 或 DPP4i 治疗的 T2DM 患者。排除同时使用 DPP4i 和 SGLT2i 的患者。采用最近邻搜索法进行倾向评分匹配(1:1 比例)。采用多变量 Cox 回归识别显著预测因素。

结果

共纳入 62699 例患者(SGLT2i 组 22154 例,DPP4i 组 40545 例)。匹配后(n=44308),166 例患者(0.37%)发生 HCC:SGLT2i 组 36 例,DPP4i 组 130 例,随访 240269 人年。总体而言,与 DPP4i 相比,SGLT2i 治疗 HCC 风险较低(风险比[HR],0.42;95%CI,0.28-0.79),经调整后差异仍有统计学意义。在肝硬化或晚期纤维化(HR,0.12;95%CI,0.04-0.41)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染(HR,0.32;95%CI,0.17-0.59)或丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染(HR,0.41;95%CI,0.22-0.80)患者中,SGLT2i 与 HCC 发生的相关性仍有统计学意义。在不同风险模型、倾向评分方法和敏感性分析中,结果均一致。

结论

经调整后,与 DPP4i 相比,SGLT2i 治疗 HCC 的风险较低,且在肝硬化、晚期纤维化、HBV 感染和 HCV 感染情况下也是如此。

相似文献

1
Lower Risks of New-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors.与 DPP4 抑制剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的新发肝细胞癌风险较低。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Jun;22(2 D). doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118.
2
Lower risk of gout in sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors in type-2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂相比二肽基肽酶-4(DPP4)抑制剂,痛风风险更低。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1501-1510. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac509.
3
Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for new-onset gastric cancer and gastric diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者新发胃癌和胃部疾病中的疗效比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2024 Sep;27(5):947-970. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01512-7. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor on the Risks of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke and Mortality in Diabetic Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Study in Hong Kong.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂对香港糖尿病患者新发心房颤动、卒中和死亡率风险的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Jun;37(3):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07319-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
New-onset syncope in diabetic patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a Chinese population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗的糖尿病患者新发晕厥:一项基于中国人群的队列研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Feb 23;10(2):103-117. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad086.
6
Comparing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on new-onset depression: a propensity score-matched study in Hong Kong.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂对新发抑郁症的影响:香港一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Jul;60(7):917-927. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02063-6. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
7
Incident heart failure and myocardial infarction in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 vs. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor users.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂使用者中的心力衰竭和心肌梗死事件。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;9(2):1388-1399. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13830. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on new-onset overall cancer in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病新发总体癌症中的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12299-12315. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5927. Epub 2023 May 6.
9
The risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者新发心房颤动的风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Nov 6;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01162-w.
10
Major adverse cardiovascular and limb events in patients with diabetes and concomitant peripheral artery disease treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗合并外周动脉疾病的糖尿病患者的主要不良心血管和肢体事件。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 30;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01118-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative risk of cancer associated with SGLT inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病患者中与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制剂(SGLT抑制剂)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4抑制剂)相关的癌症比较风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Aug 7;17(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01898-z.
2
Comparison of New-Onset Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Exposed to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, or Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists: A Population-Based Cohort Study.2型糖尿病患者中使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂后新发外周动脉疾病的比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e034175. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034175. Epub 2025 May 22.
3
Identification of the shared gene signatures and biological mechanism in type 2 diabetes mellitus and hepatocellular carcinoma.2型糖尿病与肝细胞癌共同基因特征及生物学机制的鉴定
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Mar;11(1):34-44. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2025.148439. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Pathogenic Mechanisms of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)相关肝细胞癌的致病机制
Cells. 2025 Mar 13;14(6):428. doi: 10.3390/cells14060428.
5
Dual Roles of Canagliflozin on Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Growth and Enhanced Growth Suppression in Combination with FK866.卡格列净对胆管癌细胞生长的双重作用以及与FK866联合使用时增强的生长抑制作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 24;26(3):978. doi: 10.3390/ijms26030978.