Suppr超能文献

单次间歇热暴露,增加更频繁和更短的冷却期,有助于提高训练强度,并产生与连续热暴露相当的生理反应。

Single Session Intermittent Heat Exposure With More Frequent and Shorter Cooling Breaks Facilitates Greater Training Intensity and Elicits Physiological Responses Comparable to Continuous Heat Exposure.

机构信息

Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.

School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jun 11;19(8):798-808. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0501. Print 2024 Aug 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of shorter, more frequent rest breaks with per-cooling as an alternative heat-acclimation session on physiological, perceptual, and self-paced maximal cycling performance, compared with continuous heat exposure.

METHODS

Thirteen participants completed 1 continuous and 3 intermittent-heat-exposure (IHE) maximal self-paced cycling protocols in a random order in heat (36 °C, 80% relative humidity): 1 × 60-minute exercise (CON), 3 × 20-minute exercise with 7.5-minute rest between sets (IHE-20), 4 × 15-minute exercise with 5-minute rest between sets (IHE-15), and 6 × 10-minute exercise with 3-minute rest between sets (IHE-10). Mixed-method per-cooling (crushed-ice ingestion and cooling vest) was applied during rest periods of all IHE protocols.

RESULTS

Total distance completed was greater in IHE-10, IHE-15, and IHE-20 than in CON (+11%, +9%, and +8%, respectively), with no difference observed between IHE protocols. Total time spent above 38.5 °C core temperature was longer in CON compared with IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+62% and +78%, respectively) but similar to IHE-10 (+5%). Furthermore, a longer time above 38.5 °C core temperature occurred in IHE-10 versus IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+54% and +69%, respectively). Sweat loss did not differ between conditions.

CONCLUSION

IHE with per-cooling may be a viable alternative heat-acclimation protocol in situations where training quality takes precedence over thermal stimulus or when both factors hold equal priority.

摘要

目的

研究与连续热暴露相比,作为热适应方案替代的更短、更频繁的休息期间进行冷却对生理、感知和自我调节最大自行车运动表现的影响。

方法

13 名参与者在热环境(36°C,80%相对湿度)中以随机顺序完成了 1 项连续和 3 项间歇性热暴露(IHE)最大自我调节自行车运动方案:1×60 分钟运动(CON),3×20 分钟运动,每组之间休息 7.5 分钟(IHE-20),4×15 分钟运动,每组之间休息 5 分钟(IHE-15),6×10 分钟运动,每组之间休息 3 分钟(IHE-10)。在所有 IHE 方案的休息期间,均采用混合方法进行冷却(碎冰摄入和冷却背心)。

结果

与 CON 相比,IHE-10、IHE-15 和 IHE-20 完成的总距离更大(分别增加了 11%、9%和 8%),而 IHE 方案之间没有差异。与 IHE-15 和 IHE-20 相比,CON 中超过 38.5°C 核心温度的总时间更长(分别增加了 62%和 78%),但与 IHE-10 相似(增加了 5%)。此外,IHE-10 中超过 38.5°C 核心温度的时间也比 IHE-15 和 IHE-20 长(分别增加了 54%和 69%)。在不同条件下,出汗量没有差异。

结论

在训练质量优先于热刺激或这两个因素同等重要的情况下,冷却的 IHE 可能是一种可行的热适应方案替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验