Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jun 11;19(8):798-808. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0501. Print 2024 Aug 1.
To investigate the influence of shorter, more frequent rest breaks with per-cooling as an alternative heat-acclimation session on physiological, perceptual, and self-paced maximal cycling performance, compared with continuous heat exposure.
Thirteen participants completed 1 continuous and 3 intermittent-heat-exposure (IHE) maximal self-paced cycling protocols in a random order in heat (36 °C, 80% relative humidity): 1 × 60-minute exercise (CON), 3 × 20-minute exercise with 7.5-minute rest between sets (IHE-20), 4 × 15-minute exercise with 5-minute rest between sets (IHE-15), and 6 × 10-minute exercise with 3-minute rest between sets (IHE-10). Mixed-method per-cooling (crushed-ice ingestion and cooling vest) was applied during rest periods of all IHE protocols.
Total distance completed was greater in IHE-10, IHE-15, and IHE-20 than in CON (+11%, +9%, and +8%, respectively), with no difference observed between IHE protocols. Total time spent above 38.5 °C core temperature was longer in CON compared with IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+62% and +78%, respectively) but similar to IHE-10 (+5%). Furthermore, a longer time above 38.5 °C core temperature occurred in IHE-10 versus IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+54% and +69%, respectively). Sweat loss did not differ between conditions.
IHE with per-cooling may be a viable alternative heat-acclimation protocol in situations where training quality takes precedence over thermal stimulus or when both factors hold equal priority.
研究与连续热暴露相比,作为热适应方案替代的更短、更频繁的休息期间进行冷却对生理、感知和自我调节最大自行车运动表现的影响。
13 名参与者在热环境(36°C,80%相对湿度)中以随机顺序完成了 1 项连续和 3 项间歇性热暴露(IHE)最大自我调节自行车运动方案:1×60 分钟运动(CON),3×20 分钟运动,每组之间休息 7.5 分钟(IHE-20),4×15 分钟运动,每组之间休息 5 分钟(IHE-15),6×10 分钟运动,每组之间休息 3 分钟(IHE-10)。在所有 IHE 方案的休息期间,均采用混合方法进行冷却(碎冰摄入和冷却背心)。
与 CON 相比,IHE-10、IHE-15 和 IHE-20 完成的总距离更大(分别增加了 11%、9%和 8%),而 IHE 方案之间没有差异。与 IHE-15 和 IHE-20 相比,CON 中超过 38.5°C 核心温度的总时间更长(分别增加了 62%和 78%),但与 IHE-10 相似(增加了 5%)。此外,IHE-10 中超过 38.5°C 核心温度的时间也比 IHE-15 和 IHE-20 长(分别增加了 54%和 69%)。在不同条件下,出汗量没有差异。
在训练质量优先于热刺激或这两个因素同等重要的情况下,冷却的 IHE 可能是一种可行的热适应方案替代方案。