• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫内节育器放置术中的疼痛体验:推特主题分析。

Pain experiences during intrauterine device procedures: a thematic analysis of tweets.

机构信息

University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK

Oxfordshire Sexual Health Service, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 15;50(4):271-277. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202011.

DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202011
PMID:38862196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503099/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In June 2021, high-profile testimonials in the media about pain during intrauterine device (IUD) procedures in the UK prompted significant discussion across platforms including Twitter (subsequently renamed X). We examined a sample of Twitter postings (tweets) to gain insight into public perspectives and experiences.

METHODS

We harvested tweets posted or retweeted on 21-22 June 2021 which contained the search terms coil, intrauterine system, IUD or intrauterine. We analysed the dataset thematically and selected illustrative tweets with the authors' consent for publication.

RESULTS

Following deduplication and screening, we included 1431 tweets in our analysis. We identified testimonials with descriptions of varied pain experiences. Twitter users reported that clinicians had not warned them that pain could be severe or explained the options for pain relief. Some raised concerns about pain being minimised or dismissed and linked this to the management of women's pain in medicine more broadly. Twitter users described connecting to an online community with shared experiences as validating and used this as a springboard for collective action.

CONCLUSIONS

While we acknowledge the limitations of our sample, this study highlights important perspectives and accounts relating to pain during IUD procedures. Our findings attest to the need for strategies to improve the patient experience for those opting for IUD as a clinical priority. Further research should explore IUD users' experiences, expectations and wishes around pain management.

摘要

介绍

2021 年 6 月,英国媒体对宫内节育器(IUD)手术过程中疼痛的高调证词在包括 Twitter(后更名为 X)在内的各大平台上引发了激烈讨论。我们对 Twitter 帖子(推文)进行了抽样分析,以深入了解公众的观点和体验。

方法

我们采集了 2021 年 6 月 21 日至 22 日发布或转发的推文,其中包含 coil、intrauterine system、IUD 或 intrauterine 等搜索词。我们对数据集进行了主题分析,并选择了作者同意发表的有代表性的推文。

结果

经过去重和筛选,我们的分析中包含了 1431 条推文。我们发现了一些带有不同疼痛体验描述的证词。Twitter 用户报告说,临床医生没有警告他们疼痛可能很严重,也没有解释缓解疼痛的选择。一些人对疼痛被最小化或忽视表示担忧,并将这与更广泛的女性疼痛管理联系起来。Twitter 用户描述了与具有共同经历的在线社区建立联系,认为这是一种验证,并将其作为集体行动的跳板。

结论

虽然我们承认我们的样本存在局限性,但这项研究强调了与 IUD 手术过程中疼痛相关的重要观点和描述。我们的研究结果证明,需要制定策略来改善那些选择 IUD 作为临床优先事项的患者的体验。进一步的研究应该探讨 IUD 用户在疼痛管理方面的体验、期望和愿望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4681/11503099/f130fe6b6319/bmjsrh-50-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4681/11503099/f130fe6b6319/bmjsrh-50-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4681/11503099/f130fe6b6319/bmjsrh-50-4-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain experiences during intrauterine device procedures: a thematic analysis of tweets.宫内节育器放置术中的疼痛体验:推特主题分析。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 15;50(4):271-277. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202011.
2
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
3
Women's experiences with immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a mixed-methods study.产后即时宫内节育器放置的女性经历:一项混合方法研究。
Contraception. 2018 Mar;97(3):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
Population attitudes toward contraceptive methods over time on a social media platform.社交媒体平台上不同时期人们对避孕方法的态度。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):597.e1-597.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.042. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Comparing methods of long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study of Delaware women's perceptions of intrauterine devices and the implant.长效可逆避孕方法比较:一项关于特拉华州女性对宫内节育器和皮下埋植剂看法的定性研究
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
6
Low-lying or malpositioned intrauterine devices and systems.低位或位置异常的宫内节育器及系统。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Apr;40(2):108-12. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100684. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
7
Will it Hurt? The Intrauterine Device Insertion Experience and Long-Term Acceptability Among Adolescents and Young Women.会疼吗?青少年及年轻女性的宫内节育器放置经历及长期可接受性
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Dec;32(6):615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.探究美国年轻女性采用宫内或口服紧急避孕措施的原因:一项定性研究
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0886-z.
9
Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.长效避孕方法的续用率。左炔诺孕酮皮下埋植剂与宫内节育器的比较研究。
Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):19-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00202-3.
10
Electronic Cigarette Users' Perspective on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study Using Twitter Data.电子烟使用者对 COVID-19 大流行的看法:使用 Twitter 数据的观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 5;7(1):e24859. doi: 10.2196/24859.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Women Feel Unprepared for the Experience of an Intrauterine Device Insertion: Findings From an Australian Study.女性是否对宫内节育器放置经历感到毫无准备:一项澳大利亚研究的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Sep;57(3):368-373. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70023. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Effect of intracervical block on self-reported intrauterine device insertion pain: a single-center prospective survey study.宫颈内阻滞对自我报告的宫内节育器放置疼痛的影响:一项单中心前瞻性调查研究。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Dec 17;38(2):155-158. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2440285. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
FSRH Guideline (March 2023) Intrauterine contraception.英国性健康与生殖健康学会指南(2023年3月)宫内节育器
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Mar;49(Suppl 1):1-142. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-IUC.
2
TikTok, #IUD, and User Experience With Intrauterine Devices Reported on Social Media.TikTok、IUD 和社交媒体上报的宫内节育器用户体验
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):215-217. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005027. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
On the verge between the scientific and the alternative: Swedish women's claims about systemic side effects of the copper intrauterine device.
处于科学与替代之间的边缘:瑞典女性对铜宫内节育器全身副作用的说法。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Feb;32(2):175-189. doi: 10.1177/09636625221107505. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
4
"I never went to see that doctor again": A qualitative study examining Australian women's experiences requesting removal of LARC within 12 months of insertion.“我再也不会去看那位医生了”:一项定性研究,调查澳大利亚女性在放置 LARC 后 12 个月内要求取出的经历。
Contraception. 2022 Jun;110:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
Exploring the experience of IUD self-removal in the United States through posts on internet forums.通过互联网论坛上的帖子探索美国宫内节育器自行取出的经历。
Contraception. 2022 Feb;106:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
6
Mechanisms of injustice: what we (do not) know about racialized disparities in pain.不公正的机制:我们(不)了解的疼痛方面的种族差异
Pain. 2022 Jun 1;163(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002528. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception: A content analysis of YouTube videos.长效可逆避孕措施的自行取出:YouTube 视频的内容分析。
Contraception. 2021 Dec;104(6):654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
The ripples of trauma caused by severe pain during IUD procedures.宫内节育器放置过程中剧痛所引发的创伤涟漪。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 5;374:n1910. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1910.
9
Pain scores at the insertion of the 52 MG levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system among nulligravidas and parous women.在未生育和已生育女性中,52mg 左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育系统插入时的疼痛评分。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Oct;26(5):399-403. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1925882. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Sadness, despair and anger when a patient dies alone from COVID-19: A thematic content analysis of Twitter data from bereaved family members and friends.患者独自死于 COVID-19 时的悲伤、绝望和愤怒:对失去亲人的家属和朋友的 Twitter 数据进行的主题内容分析。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;35(7):1267-1276. doi: 10.1177/02692163211017026. Epub 2021 May 21.