Suppr超能文献

加速康复直肠切除术后提前出院并不会增加急诊就诊率和再入院率:单中心分析。

Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Center for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4251-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.

摘要

背景

在加速康复路径中,结肠切除术的当日出院已被证明是可行的。但直肠切除术患者多早出院才安全还不清楚。本研究旨在确定直肠切除术后≤3 天出院的患者是否与急诊就诊和再入院率的增加相关。

方法

回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 15 日期间在一家单机构的前瞻性维护的结直肠外科数据库中接受加速康复低位前切除术、腹会阴切除术和直肠结肠切除术的患者。术后第 4-7 天和出院后第 30 天安排门诊就诊,造口患者每 1-2 周就诊一次,直到不再需要就诊。使用逻辑回归模型分析术后第 1-3 天、第 4-5 天和第≥6 天出院与急诊就诊和再入院发生率的关系。

结果

共有 118 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 76 名患者有造口。中位术后住院时间为 5[IQR 6.5]天。平均年龄为 58.6 岁;59.3%为 ASA-3 级;69.5%采用微创外科方法。不同出院日组之间急诊就诊率无显著差异(p=0.096)。没有患者当天出院,无造口的患者有 1 人在术后第 1 天出院,10 人(2 人有造口)在术后第 2 天出院,24 人(13 人有造口)在术后第 3 天出院。术后第 1-3 天组的急诊就诊率最低(14.3%),但与其他出院组无显著差异(p=0.166)。该组的再入院率也最低(11.4%),与其他出院组也无显著差异(p=0.261),逻辑回归也证实了这一点。术后第 1-3 天组的并发症发生率最低(p<0.001)。

结论

加速康复部分或完全直肠切除术后的早期出院与急诊就诊和再入院率的增加无关。后续研究应确定允许安全提前出院的出院后资源,这些资源可能是标准化和可推广的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验