Suppr超能文献

住院老年患者药物减量干预后的急诊科就诊和再次住院情况。

Emergency department visits and hospital readmissions after a deprescribing intervention among hospitalized older adults.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2038-2047. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18945. Epub 2024 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing is the planned/supervised method of dose reduction or cessation of medications that might be harmful, or no longer be beneficial. Though benefits of deprescribing are debatable in improving clinical outcomes, it has been associated with decreased number of potentially inappropriate medications, which may potentially reduce the risk of adverse events among hospitalized older adults. With unclear evidence for deprescribing in this population, this study aimed to examine time-to-first unplanned healthcare utilization, which included 90-day emergency department (ED) visits or hospital readmission and associated predictors, during a deprescribing intervention.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of a clinical trial (Shed-MEDS NCT02979353) was performed. Cox regression was used to compare the time-to-first 90-day ED visit/readmission/death from hospital discharge for the intervention and control groups. Additionally, we performed exploratory analysis of predictors (comorbidities, functional health status, drug burden index (DBI), hospital length of stay, health literacy, food insecurity, and financial burden) associated with the time-to-first 90-day ED visit/readmission/death.

RESULTS

The hazard of first 90-day ED visits/readmissions/death was 15% lower in the intervention versus the control group (95% CI: 0.61-1.19, p = 0.352, respectively); however, this difference was not statistically significant. For every additional number of comorbidities (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.21) and each additional day of hospital length of stay (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were significantly associated with a higher hazard of 90-day ED visit/readmission/death in the intervention group; whereas for each unit of increase in pre-hospital DBI score (HR: 1.08 and HR 1.16, respectively) was significantly associated with a higher hazard of 90-day ED visit/readmission/death in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention and control groups had comparable time-to-first 90-day ED visit/readmission/death during a deprescribing intervention. This finding suggests that deprescribing did not result in a higher risk of ED visit/readmission/death during the 90-day period following hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

减药是一种有计划的、受监督的药物剂量减少或停药方法,适用于那些可能有害或不再有益的药物。虽然减药在改善临床结局方面的益处存在争议,但它与减少潜在不适当药物的数量有关,这可能降低住院老年患者发生不良事件的风险。由于在这一人群中减药的证据尚不明确,本研究旨在探讨在减药干预期间,首次无计划的医疗保健利用(包括 90 天内急诊就诊或再次住院)的时间,并分析相关预测因素。

方法

对一项临床试验(Shed-MEDS NCT02979353)进行二次数据分析。采用 Cox 回归比较干预组和对照组患者从出院到首次 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的时间。此外,我们还对与首次 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡相关的预测因素(合并症、功能健康状况、药物负担指数(DBI)、住院时间、健康素养、食物不安全和经济负担)进行了探索性分析。

结果

干预组首次 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的风险比对照组低 15%(95%CI:0.61-1.19,p=0.352),但差异无统计学意义。每增加一种合并症(危险比(HR):1.12,95%CI:1.04-1.21)和住院时间增加一天(HR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07)与干预组 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的风险显著增加相关;而干预组住院前 DBI 评分每增加一个单位(HR:1.08 和 HR 1.16)与 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的风险显著增加相关。

结论

在减药干预期间,干预组和对照组患者首次 90 天内急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的时间无显著差异。这一发现表明,在出院后 90 天内,减药并未增加急诊就诊/再次住院/死亡的风险。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Deprescribing trials: A focus on adverse drug withdrawal events.减药试验:关注药物撤药不良事件。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2738-2741. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17883. Epub 2022 May 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验