Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 11;25(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02458-6.
The Ethiopian Primary Healthcare Clinical Guidelines (EPHCG) seek to improve quality of primary health care, while also expanding access to care for people with Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health Conditions (NCDs/MHCs). The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers to implementation of the EPHCG with a particular focus on NCDs/MHCs.
A mixed-methods convergent-parallel design was employed after EPHCG implementation in 18 health facilities in southern Ethiopia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 primary healthcare clinicians and one healthcare administrator. Organisational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) questionnaire was self-completed by 124 health workers and analysed using Kruskal Wallis ranked test to investigate median score differences. Qualitative data were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) were employed to select implementation strategies to address barriers.
Four domains were identified: EPHCG training and implementation, awareness and meeting patient needs (demand side), resource constraints/barriers (supply side) and care pathway bottlenecks. The innovative facility-based training to implement EPHCG had a mixed response, especially in busy facilities where teams reported struggling to find protected time to meet. Key barriers to implementation of EPHCG were non-availability of resources (CFIR inner setting), such as laboratory reagents and medications that undermined efforts to follow guideline-based care, the way care was structured and lack of familiarity with providing care for people with NCDs-MHCs. Substantial barriers arose because of socio-economic problems that were interlinked with health but not addressable within the health system (CFIR outer setting). Other factors influencing effective implementation of EPHCG (TDF) included low population awareness about NCDs/MHCs and unaffordable diagnostic and treatment services (TDF). Implementation strategies were identified. ORIC findings indicated high scores of organisational readiness to implement the desired change with likely social desirability bias.
Although perceived as necessary, practical implementation of EPHCG was constrained by challenges across domains of internal/external determinants. This was especially marked in relation to expansion of care responsibilities to include NCDs/MHCs. Attention to social determinants of health outcomes, community engagement and awareness-raising are needed to maximize population impact.
埃塞俄比亚基本医疗临床指南(EPHCG)旨在提高初级卫生保健的质量,同时扩大对患有非传染性疾病和精神健康状况(NCDs/MHCs)人群的医疗服务覆盖范围。本研究旨在确定实施 EPHCG 的障碍和促进因素,特别是针对 NCDs/MHCs。
在埃塞俄比亚南部的 18 个卫生机构实施 EPHCG 后,采用了混合方法的收敛平行设计。对 10 名初级保健临床医生和 1 名医疗保健管理人员进行了半结构化访谈。124 名卫生工作者自行完成了组织准备实施变革(ORIC)问卷,并使用 Kruskal Wallis 等级检验进行分析,以调查中位数得分差异。定性数据被映射到实施科学综合框架(CFIR)和理论领域框架(TDF)。实施变革专家建议(ERIC)被用来选择实施策略来解决障碍。
确定了四个领域:EPHCG 培训和实施、意识和满足患者需求(需求方)、资源限制/障碍(供应方)和护理途径瓶颈。以设施为基础的创新培训来实施 EPHCG 的效果参差不齐,特别是在繁忙的设施中,团队报告难以找到受保护的时间来满足需求。实施 EPHCG 的主要障碍是非资源的可用性(CFIR 内部环境),例如实验室试剂和药物,这破坏了遵循基于指南的护理的努力,护理结构方式和缺乏为 NCDs-MHCs 患者提供护理的熟悉度。由于与健康相关但无法在卫生系统内解决的社会经济问题,出现了大量的障碍(CFIR 外部环境)。影响 EPHCG 有效实施的其他因素(TDF)包括对 NCDs/MHCs 的认识低和诊断和治疗服务负担不起(TDF)。确定了实施策略。ORIC 结果表明,组织有很高的准备水平来实施所需的变革,可能存在社会期望偏差。
尽管被认为是必要的,但 EPHCG 的实际实施受到内部/外部决定因素领域的挑战的限制。这在扩大护理责任以包括 NCDs/MHCs 方面尤为明显。需要关注卫生结果的社会决定因素、社区参与和提高认识,以最大限度地提高人口影响。