• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院糖尿病患者的前瞻性评估:一项包含过程评估的整群随机可行性试验,方案V3.1

Proactive review for people with diabetes in hospital: a cluster randomised feasibility trial with process evaluation, protocol V3.1.

作者信息

Lake Andrea K, Bansiya Vishakha, Davenport Katy, Murdoch Jamie, Murphy Helen R, Smith Toby, Clark Allan, Arthur Antony

机构信息

The Wolfson Diabetes & Endocrine Clinic , Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 281, Cambridge, CB20QQ, UK.

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01507-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-024-01507-2
PMID:38863071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11165828/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes inpatient specialist services vary across the country, with limited evidence to guide service delivery. Currently, referrals to diabetes inpatient specialists are usually 'reactive' after diabetes-related events have taken place, which are associated with an increased risk of morbidity/mortality and increased length of hospital stay. We propose that a proactive diabetes review model of care, delivered by diabetes inpatient specialist nurses, may contribute to the prevention of such diabetes-related events and result in a reduction in the risk of harm.

METHOD

We will conduct a cluster randomised feasibility study with process evaluation. The proactive diabetes review model (PDRM) is a complex intervention that focuses on the prevention of potentially modifiable diabetes-related harms. All eligible patients will receive a comprehensive, structured diabetes review that aims to identify and prevent potentially modifiable diabetes-related harms through utilising a standardised review structure. Reviews are undertaken by a diabetes inpatient specialist nurse within one working day of admission. This differs from usual care where patients are often only seen after diabetes-related harms have taken place. The trial duration will be approximately 32 weeks, with intervention delivery throughout. There will be an initial 8-week run-in phase, followed by a 24-week data collection phase. Eight wards will be equally randomised to either PDRM or usual care. Adult patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes admitted to an included ward will be eligible. Data collection will be limited to that typically collected as part of usual care. Data collected will include descriptive data at both the ward and patient level and glucose measures, such as frequency and results of capillary glucose testing, ketonaemia and hypoglycaemic events. The analysis aims to determine the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention and the feasibility of a future definitive trial. Whilst this study is primarily about trial feasibility, the findings of the process evaluation may lead to changes to both trial processes and modifications to the intervention. A qualitative process evaluation will be conducted in parallel to the trial. A minimum of 22 patients, nurses, doctors, and managers will be recruited with methods including direct non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The feasibility of a future definitive trial will be assessed by evaluating recruitment and randomisation processes, staffing resources and quality of available data.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this cluster randomised feasibility trial with a process evaluation is to explore the feasibility of a definitive trial and identify appropriate outcome measures. If a trial is feasible and the effectiveness of PDRM can be evaluated, this could inform the future development of inpatient diabetes services nationally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UK Clinical Research Network, 51,167. ISRCTN, ISRCTN70402110. Registered on 21 February 2022.

摘要

背景

糖尿病住院专科服务在全国范围内各不相同,指导服务提供的证据有限。目前,通常在糖尿病相关事件发生后才将患者转诊至糖尿病住院专科医生处,这些事件与发病/死亡风险增加及住院时间延长有关。我们提出,由糖尿病住院专科护士提供的主动式糖尿病评估护理模式,可能有助于预防此类糖尿病相关事件,并降低伤害风险。

方法

我们将进行一项带有过程评估的整群随机可行性研究。主动式糖尿病评估模式(PDRM)是一项复杂干预措施,侧重于预防潜在可改变的糖尿病相关伤害。所有符合条件的患者都将接受全面、结构化的糖尿病评估,旨在通过使用标准化评估结构来识别和预防潜在可改变的糖尿病相关伤害。评估由糖尿病住院专科护士在患者入院后一个工作日内进行。这与常规护理不同,常规护理中患者通常在糖尿病相关伤害发生后才会得到诊治。试验持续时间约为32周,全程进行干预。将有一个为期8周的初始导入期,随后是一个为期24周的数据收集期。八个病房将被随机分为PDRM组或常规护理组。入住纳入病房且已知患有糖尿病的成年患者将符合条件。数据收集将限于常规护理通常收集的内容。收集的数据将包括病房和患者层面的描述性数据以及血糖测量值,如毛细血管血糖检测的频率和结果、酮血症和低血糖事件。分析旨在确定干预措施的保真度和可接受性以及未来确定性试验的可行性。虽然本研究主要关注试验可行性,但过程评估的结果可能会导致试验流程的改变以及干预措施的调整。将与试验并行进行定性过程评估。将通过直接非参与观察和半结构化访谈等方法,招募至少22名患者、护士、医生和管理人员。未来确定性试验的可行性将通过评估招募和随机化过程、人员资源以及可用数据的质量来评估。

讨论

这项带有过程评估的整群随机可行性试验的目的是探索确定性试验的可行性并确定合适的结局指标。如果试验可行且能评估PDRM的有效性,这可能为全国住院糖尿病服务的未来发展提供参考。

试验注册

英国临床研究网络,51,167。国际标准随机对照试验编号,ISRCTN70402110。于2022年2月21日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c722/11165828/d41c6e70d84a/40814_2024_1507_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c722/11165828/09a71c427e4d/40814_2024_1507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c722/11165828/d41c6e70d84a/40814_2024_1507_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c722/11165828/09a71c427e4d/40814_2024_1507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c722/11165828/d41c6e70d84a/40814_2024_1507_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Proactive review for people with diabetes in hospital: a cluster randomised feasibility trial with process evaluation, protocol V3.1.医院糖尿病患者的前瞻性评估:一项包含过程评估的整群随机可行性试验,方案V3.1
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01507-2.
2
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
7
Self-management toolkit and delivery strategy for end-of-life pain: the mixed-methods feasibility study.自我管理工具包和临终疼痛的传递策略:混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(76):1-292. doi: 10.3310/hta21760.
8
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
9
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
10
Enhanced psychological care in cardiac rehabilitation services for patients with new-onset depression: the CADENCE feasibility study and pilot RCT.心脏康复服务中新发抑郁症患者强化心理护理:CADENCE 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(30):1-220. doi: 10.3310/hta22300.

本文引用的文献

1
The role and challenges of cluster randomised trials for global health.群组随机对照试验在全球卫生中的作用和挑战。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e701-e710. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30541-6.
2
Improving patient experience and safety at transitions of care through the Your Care Needs You (YCNY) intervention: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.通过“您的护理需要您”(YCNY)干预改善护理转接过程中的患者体验和安全:一项整群随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:123. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00655-5. eCollection 2020.
3
The effect of hypoglycaemia during hospital admission on health-related outcomes for people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
住院期间低血糖对糖尿病患者健康相关结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1349-1359. doi: 10.1111/dme.14115. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
4
Early Intervention for Diabetes in Medical and Surgical Inpatients Decreases Hyperglycemia and Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Cluster Randomized Trial.住院患者糖尿病的早期干预可降低高血糖和医院获得性感染:一项整群随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):832-840. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2342. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的可信度
Medsurg Nurs. 2016 Nov;25(6):435-6.
6
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?定性研究数据的主题分析:它有听起来那么简单吗?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
7
Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: new and common ethical challenges.在整群随机临床试验中知情同意:新的和共同的伦理挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Feb;44(2):114-120. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104249. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
Management of hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.住院2型糖尿病患者的管理
J Transl Int Med. 2016 Dec 1;4(4):155-161. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0027. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
9
Impact of the Diabetes Inpatient Care and Education (DICE) project and the DICE Care Pathway on patient outcomes and trainee doctor's knowledge and confidence.糖尿病住院护理与教育(DICE)项目及DICE护理路径对患者预后以及实习医生知识和信心的影响。
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):920-4. doi: 10.1111/dme.12765. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.