Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e701-e710. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30541-6.
Evaluating whether an intervention works when trialled in groups of individuals can pose complex challenges for clinical research. Cluster randomised controlled trials involve the random allocation of groups or clusters of individuals to receive an intervention, and they are commonly used in global health research. In this paper, we describe the potential reasons for the increasing popularity of cluster trials in low-income and middle-income countries. We also draw on key areas of global health research for an assessment of common trial planning practices, and we address their methodological shortcomings and pitfalls. Lastly, we discuss alternative approaches for population-level intervention trials that could be useful for research undertaken in low-income and middle-income countries for situations in which the use of cluster randomisation might not be appropriate.
评估干预措施在个体群体试验中的效果可能会给临床研究带来复杂的挑战。整群随机对照试验涉及将个体的群体或群组随机分配接受干预措施,它们在全球健康研究中被广泛使用。在本文中,我们描述了在低收入和中等收入国家中,整群试验日益普及的潜在原因。我们还借鉴了全球健康研究的重点领域,对常见的试验规划实践进行了评估,并探讨了它们在方法学上的缺点和陷阱。最后,我们讨论了在低收入和中等收入国家进行人群干预试验的替代方法,这些方法可能对不适合使用整群随机分组的情况有用。