• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查项目的预期参与情况与实际参与情况。

Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

作者信息

Dreier Maren, Brinkmann Melanie, Stahmeyer Jona Theodor, Hemmerling Melissa, Krauth Christian, Walter Ulla

机构信息

Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover, Germany; Hannover Medical School. Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover, Germany; AOK Niedersachsen-Statutory Health Insurance of Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):497-504. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087
PMID:38863282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526357/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public generally has a positive view of colorectal cancer screening, but there is still room for improvement in participation rates. The aim of this study was to identify factors that are associated with intended and actual participation.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of a random sample of insurees of the AOK (a statutory health insurance carrier) in the German federal state of Lower Saxony. 50-year-old men and 55-year-old women who were eligible for their first screening colonoscopy received a written questionnaire in June 2020, three weeks after being invited to undergo colorectal cancer screening. For those who intended to do so, we used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine any statistical associations between sociodemographic and medical characteristics and participation rates within 30 months.

RESULTS

82.7% of the respondents (239/298) intended to participate, and 43.3% (129/298) actually did so within 30 months. The participation rates among persons who had already decided to have a stool test or a colonoscopy were 50.7% (36/71) and 55.2% (58/105), respectively; the participation rate among undecided persons was 33.3% (19/57). The strongest association in the regression model was with an already made appointment (OR = 11.1, 95% confidence interval: [3.9; 31.8]). After exclusion of the existingappointment variable from the regression model, living in a smaller town (OR = 2.41 [1.08; 5.35]) and a stated preference for colonoscopy (OR = 2.52; [1.20; 5.27]) were positively associated with participation. Insurees with a parent affected by colorectal cancer participated less frequently, even after adjustment for prior colonoscopies (OR = 0.31 [0.12; 0.80]).

CONCLUSION

The wide gap between intended and actual participation implies that there is potential for improvement in the prevention of colorectal cancer, and that certain groups of people could benefit from targeted support in making their intention to undergo screening a reality. Because of the methodological limitations of this initial investigation, its findings need to be confirmed by further studies.

摘要

背景

公众对结直肠癌筛查总体持积极态度,但参与率仍有提升空间。本研究旨在确定与预期参与和实际参与相关的因素。

方法

我们对德国下萨克森州法定健康保险公司AOK的被保险人随机样本进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。符合首次筛查结肠镜检查条件的50岁男性和55岁女性在2020年6月收到一份书面问卷,这是在被邀请进行结直肠癌筛查三周后。对于那些打算进行筛查的人,我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定社会人口统计学和医学特征与30个月内参与率之间的任何统计关联。

结果

82.7%的受访者(239/298)打算参与,43.3%(129/298)在30个月内实际参与。已经决定进行粪便检测或结肠镜检查的人的参与率分别为50.7%(36/71)和55.2%(58/105);未做决定的人的参与率为33.3%(19/57)。回归模型中最强的关联是与已经预约(比值比=11.1,95%置信区间:[3.9;31.8])。从回归模型中排除现有预约变量后,居住在较小城镇(比值比=2.41[1.08;5.35])和表示倾向于结肠镜检查(比值比=2.52;[1.20;5.27])与参与呈正相关。即使在调整先前的结肠镜检查后,父母患有结直肠癌的被保险人参与频率较低(比值比=0.31[0.12;0.80])。

结论

预期参与和实际参与之间的巨大差距意味着结直肠癌预防方面有改进的潜力,并且某些人群可能会从有针对性地支持其将筛查意愿变为现实中受益。由于这项初步调查的方法学局限性,其结果需要进一步研究加以证实。

相似文献

1
Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.结直肠癌筛查项目的预期参与情况与实际参与情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):497-504. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087.
2
Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).参与结直肠癌筛查的竞争策略:一项随机卫生服务研究(PICCOLINO 研究)。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.049. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Screening for Bowel Cancer: Increasing Participation via Personal Invitation.结直肠癌筛查:通过个人邀请提高参与率。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Feb 10;114(6):87-93. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0087.
4
Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.家族性结直肠癌高危人群的结肠镜筛查邀请。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Oct 26;115(43):715-722. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0715.
5
Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.单份样本与双份粪便免疫化学试验在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中的多次检测:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):622-631. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30176-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
The effect of gender-specific invitation letters on utilization of colorectal cancer screening.特定性别的邀请函对结直肠癌筛查利用率的影响。
Z Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;57(9):1051-1058. doi: 10.1055/a-0958-2874. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
Mental disorders, participation, and trajectories in the Danish colorectal cancer programme: a population-based cohort study.精神障碍、参与度与丹麦结直肠癌项目中的轨迹:基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;10(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00179-7.
8
Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.早期采用多靶点粪便DNA检测进行结直肠癌筛查。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):726-733. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.019.
9
Factors to Improve Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer.提高结直肠癌内镜筛查效果的因素。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):289-293. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00402-2.
10
Colorectal cancer screening: Associations between information provision, attitudes and intended participation.结直肠癌筛查:信息提供、态度和参与意向之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):546-550. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention based on the integrated theory of planned behavior among the average-risk individuals.基于计划行为理论综合模型的普通风险个体结直肠癌筛查意向预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1800. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14191-9.
2
Impact of demographic changes and screening colonoscopy on long-term projection of incident colorectal cancer cases in Germany: A modelling study.人口结构变化和结肠镜筛查对德国结直肠癌发病病例长期预测的影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 30;20:100451. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100451. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
[The informed decision as an aim of evidence-based health information: the example of cancer screening].[作为循证健康信息目标的知情决策:癌症筛查实例]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 May;65(5):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03526-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail-out bowel cancer screening.一种健康行动过程方法,用于开发受邀者认可的干预措施,以增加邮寄结直肠癌筛查。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022 Aug;14(3):776-794. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12346. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
[Completely Different or Quite Similar? The Sociodemographic Structure of the AOK Lower Saxony in Comparison to the General and Working Population in Lower Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany].[截然不同还是极为相似?与下萨克森州及德意志联邦共和国的普通人口和劳动人口相比,下萨克森州AOK的社会人口结构]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Nov;83(S 02):S77-S86. doi: 10.1055/a-1553-3565. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
What Predicts the Physical Activity Intention-Behavior Gap? A Systematic Review.什么因素可以预测身体活动意向-行为差距?系统综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):1-20. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab044.
7
The application of health behavior theories to promote cervical cancer screening uptake.应用健康行为理论促进宫颈癌筛查的接受度。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Nov;38(6):1039-1079. doi: 10.1111/phn.12944. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.德国近端和远端结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率——筛查结肠镜时代的趋势。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Apr 23;118(16):281-287. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0111.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
10
Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT).结直肠癌筛查参与的行为控制:粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)。
Int J Behav Med. 2022 Feb;29(1):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09976-y. Epub 2021 Mar 30.