• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[作为循证健康信息目标的知情决策:癌症筛查实例]

[The informed decision as an aim of evidence-based health information: the example of cancer screening].

作者信息

Schröer-Günther Milly, Koch Klaus

机构信息

Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 May;65(5):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03526-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-022-03526-x
PMID:35471606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9064846/
Abstract

In order to enable people to make an informed decision about participating in cancer screening, disadvantages like medical risks have be communicated in addition to advantages. The information in the decision aids should be evidence-based, neutral, balanced, understandable, and adequate in scope. The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) was commissioned by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in 2014 and 2015 to develop decision aids in the form of brochures on participation in mammography, colorectal cancer, and cervical cancer screening, which are now in use.This article describes the development of the decision aids, with a focus on the results of user tests, which were executed by an external provider. Of the testers, 10 to 20% changed their attitude toward taking part in the screening test within the three categories "willing to take part," "undecided," and "not willing to take part" after reading the brochures. This indicates that an informed decision is supported by the materials. The user tests helped to better adapt the decision aids to the information needs of target groups.

摘要

为了使人们能够在充分了解信息的基础上做出是否参与癌症筛查的决定,除了告知参与筛查的益处外,还应说明诸如医疗风险等弊端。决策辅助工具中的信息应以证据为基础,保持中立、平衡,易于理解且范围适当。医疗质量和效率研究所(IQWiG)在2014年和2015年受联邦联合委员会(G-BA)委托,编写了关于乳腺摄影、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查参与情况的宣传册形式的决策辅助工具,这些工具目前正在使用。本文介绍了这些决策辅助工具的开发过程,重点是由外部供应商进行的用户测试结果。在阅读宣传册后,10%至20%的测试者在“愿意参与”“不确定”和“不愿意参与”这三个类别中改变了他们对参与筛查测试的态度。这表明这些材料有助于人们做出充分知情的决定。用户测试有助于使决策辅助工具更好地适应目标群体的信息需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/ff0e8fe314f6/103_2022_3526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/00d1e8b463d3/103_2022_3526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/ee999673ab02/103_2022_3526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/ff0e8fe314f6/103_2022_3526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/00d1e8b463d3/103_2022_3526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/ee999673ab02/103_2022_3526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/9064846/ff0e8fe314f6/103_2022_3526_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[The informed decision as an aim of evidence-based health information: the example of cancer screening].[作为循证健康信息目标的知情决策:癌症筛查实例]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 May;65(5):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03526-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
[Development of Decision Aids for Organized Cervical Carcinoma Screening in Germany].[德国有组织宫颈癌筛查决策辅助工具的开发]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Feb;83(2):128-134. doi: 10.1055/a-1028-7283. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
3
[Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].[德国关于结直肠癌筛查的信息材料是否易懂,还是存在缺陷?不同教育背景用户对健康信息的评价]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014 Mar;57(3):366-79. doi: 10.1007/s00103-013-1908-x.
4
How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.英国网站如何传达宫颈癌筛查信息?内容和定量呈现格式的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e029551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029551.
5
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.决策辅助工具能否改善乳房X光检查筛查中的知情选择?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0210-5.
6
Are women getting relevant information about mammography screening for an informed consent: a critical appraisal of information brochures used for screening invitation in Germany, Italy, Spain and France.女性是否获得了有关乳腺 X 光筛查的相关信息以做出知情同意:对德国、意大利、西班牙和法国用于筛查邀请的信息手册进行批判性评估。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):409-14. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp174. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
7
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
8
Decision-making about mammographic screening: pursuing informed choice.关于乳腺钼靶筛查的决策:追求知情选择。
Climacteric. 2018 Jun;21(3):209-213. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1406912. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
The Barrier to Informed Choice in Cancer Screening: Statistical Illiteracy in Physicians and Patients.癌症筛查中明智选择的障碍:医生和患者的统计知识匮乏
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;210:207-221. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64310-6_13.
10
Uncertain times: A survey of Canadian women's perspectives toward mammography screening.不确定时期:加拿大女性对乳房 X 光筛查看法的调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.结直肠癌筛查项目的预期参与情况与实际参与情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):497-504. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
2
Clarifying values: an updated review.澄清价值观:最新综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S8. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
4
Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.基于证据的风险信息对结直肠癌筛查中“知情选择”的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Jun 2;342:d3193. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3193.
5
Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.共同决策的测量——工具综述
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4.
6
How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map.如何为患者开发基于网络的决策支持干预措施:过程图。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034. Epub 2010 Jun 2.