• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高结直肠癌内镜筛查效果的因素。

Factors to Improve Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgeons with Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kazakh-Russian Medical University, 050004, 71 Torekul Str., Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.

Department of General Surgery, Kazakh-Russian Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):289-293. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00402-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12029-020-00402-2
PMID:32303997
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is one of the most sprayed cancers; the gold standard of diagnostic is a colonoscopy. The quality of this examination is depended on many factors, which includes doctors' experience.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to establish the main factors affecting the completeness of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Endoscopists were questioned; descriptive statistics methods and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The main factors that influence the quality of screening colonoscopy were identified: experience in colonoscopy, theoretical training, participation in the screening program, and number of annual colonoscopies. The calculated odds ratio for the selected dependent variable is calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The experience for more than 5 years (p = 0.017) and at least 200 colonoscopies per year (p = 0.004) are the main factors that allow to perform complete colonoscopy in 90% or more of cases.

摘要

简介

结直肠癌是最常见的癌症之一;诊断的金标准是结肠镜检查。检查的质量取决于许多因素,包括医生的经验。

目的

本研究旨在确定影响结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查完整性的主要因素。

材料与方法

对内镜医生进行询问;采用描述性统计方法和逻辑回归。

结果与讨论

确定了影响筛查结肠镜检查质量的主要因素:结肠镜检查经验、理论培训、参与筛查计划以及每年结肠镜检查的数量。计算了选定因变量的计算比值比。

结论

超过 5 年的经验(p=0.017)和每年至少 200 次结肠镜检查(p=0.004)是能够使 90%或更多病例完成结肠镜检查的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Factors to Improve Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer.提高结直肠癌内镜筛查效果的因素。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):289-293. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00402-2.
2
Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.影响结肠镜检查质量的内镜医师特征。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):241-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
3
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Quality metrics of screening colonoscopies performed by PAs.执业助理医师进行的结肠镜筛查的质量指标。
JAAPA. 2020 Apr;33(4):43-48. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000657192.96190.ab.
5
The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.预测腺瘤检出率的转换因子因结肠镜检查适应证和患者性别而异。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul;29(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558.
6
Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.内镜医师工作量与结肠镜检查后间期癌症的关系:来自韩国国家结直肠癌筛查计划的结果。
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;56(4):1164-1170. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.009. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.腺瘤检出率随内镜医师工作量中操作时间的增加而下降。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug-Sep;29(6):304-8. doi: 10.1155/2015/789038. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing.内镜医师在结直肠肿瘤检出率方面的差异及其对基于粪便潜血试验后结肠镜检查的区域性筛查计划的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.032. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured.联邦无保险人群结直肠癌筛查项目中的筛查质量差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 30;16:E67. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180452.
10
Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).参与结直肠癌筛查的竞争策略:一项随机卫生服务研究(PICCOLINO 研究)。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.049. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the current state of anxiety and its related factors in Chinese patients undergoing colonoscopy? A cross-sectional study.接受结肠镜检查的中国患者的焦虑现状及其相关因素是什么?一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 27;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02463-z.
2
Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.不同结肠段腺瘤检出率与各自退镜时间的关系:一项回顾性单中心研究
JGH Open. 2025 Jan 8;9(1):e70095. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70095. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of over-the-scope-clip system for the treatment of acute upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经内镜套扎器系统治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1144-4.
2
Adverse events associated with colonoscopy; an examination of online concerns.与结肠镜检查相关的不良事件;对网络关注问题的审视
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1127-5.
3
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
4
Oral diseases: a global public health challenge.口腔疾病:全球公共健康挑战。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.
5
The effects of inpatient music therapy on self-reported symptoms at an academic cancer center: a preliminary report.住院音乐疗法对学术癌症中心患者自述症状的影响:初步报告。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4207-4212. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04713-4. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Downregulation of serum metabolite GTA-446 as a novel potential marker for early detection of colorectal cancer.血清代谢物GTA-446的下调作为早期检测结直肠癌的一种新型潜在标志物。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):227-232. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.163. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
An evaluation of a public health practitioner registration programme: lessons learned for workforce development.一项公共卫生从业者注册计划的评估:劳动力发展的经验教训。
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Sep;134(5):259-67. doi: 10.1177/1757913914544883.
8
Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).结肠镜筛查质量:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明
Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):957-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325686. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.美国 2011 年癌症筛查:对当前美国癌症协会指南的回顾以及癌症筛查中的问题。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):8-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.20096. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
10
Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations.美国初级保健医生对粪便潜血检测的看法及做法:严重偏离循证医学建议
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):833-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1328-7. Epub 2010 Apr 10.