• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后测试个体的听力后遗症评估。

Assessment of hearing sequelae in individuals tested post-trauma.

机构信息

Council of Forensic Medicine, Gümüşhane Forensic Medicine Branch Office, Gümüşhane-Türkiye.

Council of Forensic Medicine 2nd Specialization Board İstanbul, İstanbul-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):444-454. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.63099.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2024.63099
PMID:38863291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11230046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over 5% of the global population (430 million people) require rehabilitation for hearing loss. Individuals with hearing impairments face significant challenges in business, daily life, and social participation. Hearing loss (HL) and other permanent physical and sensory disabilities escalate dramatically in cases with brain damage and temporal bone trauma associated with head injuries. This study aims to identify the significant risk factors for hearing loss following head trauma, utilizing current data, and discuss the findings in the context of the literature. This could contribute to the development of standard approaches for assessing such cases.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed files and reports from individuals assessed for hearing loss at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine. The study included cases that applied at least 12 months post-trauma, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, after their recovery process was completed. Sociodemographic data, types of temporal bone fractures, initial otoscopic examination findings, presence or absence of intracranial injury, type of hearing loss, and audiometry test results for air and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages were evaluated. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).

RESULTS

Out of 244 cases, 177 (72.5%) were male and 67 (27.5%) were female. It was observed that the majority of trauma cases occurred in the 19-40 age group (49.2%; n=120). In the initial otoscopic examinations post-trauma, otorrhagia/otorrhea was the most common finding, both as an isolated symptom (n=59, 24.2%) and when accompanied by other symptoms. No temporal bone fractures were detected in 43 cases (17.6%). Longitudinal fractures were found in 141 cases (57.8%), transverse fractures in 48 (19.7%), and mixed-type fractures in 12 (4.9%). The statistical difference in air conduction and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages between groups with and without intracranial injury was significant (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Post-traumatic examinations should employ a multidisciplinary approach, adhering to standard medical improvement and assessment timelines. It is essential to verify whether each patient's medical improvement process has reached its maximum potential. We believe that adhering to these recommendations and utilizing standardized classifications for hearing loss will prevent the loss of rights.

摘要

背景

全球超过 5%的人口(4.3 亿人)需要进行听力损失康复治疗。听力受损的个体在商业、日常生活和社会参与方面面临重大挑战。听力损失(HL)和其他永久性的身体和感官残疾在与头部损伤相关的脑损伤和颞骨创伤的情况下会急剧增加。本研究旨在利用现有数据确定头部创伤后听力损失的显著风险因素,并结合文献讨论研究结果。这有助于制定评估此类病例的标准方法。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,对在宰牲节大学医学院法医学系评估听力损失的个人的档案和报告进行了审查。该研究包括在创伤后至少 12 个月(2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日)申请的病例,且在康复过程完成后。评估了社会人口统计学数据、颞骨骨折类型、初始耳镜检查结果、是否存在颅内损伤、听力损失类型以及空气和骨导纯音阈值平均的听力图检查结果。使用 SPSS 26.0(社会科学统计软件包)进行数据分析。

结果

在 244 例中,177 例(72.5%)为男性,67 例(27.5%)为女性。观察到大多数创伤病例发生在 19-40 岁年龄组(49.2%;n=120)。在创伤后的初始耳镜检查中,耳漏/耳溢是最常见的发现,既可以是孤立的症状(n=59,24.2%),也可以与其他症状一起出现。在 43 例(17.6%)中未发现颞骨骨折。在 141 例(57.8%)中发现纵向骨折,在 48 例(19.7%)中发现横向骨折,在 12 例(4.9%)中发现混合类型骨折。有颅内损伤组和无颅内损伤组的气导和骨导纯音阈值平均值的统计学差异有显著意义(p<0.001)。

结论

创伤后检查应采用多学科方法,遵循标准的医疗改善和评估时间线。必须验证每位患者的医疗改善过程是否已达到最大潜力。我们相信,遵循这些建议并对听力损失使用标准化分类将防止权利丧失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e37/11230046/7a34a2515a06/TJTES-30-444-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e37/11230046/e0301ce0be5c/TJTES-30-444-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e37/11230046/7a34a2515a06/TJTES-30-444-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e37/11230046/e0301ce0be5c/TJTES-30-444-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e37/11230046/7a34a2515a06/TJTES-30-444-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of hearing sequelae in individuals tested post-trauma.创伤后测试个体的听力后遗症评估。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):444-454. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.63099.
2
The Rates and Clinical Characteristics of Pneumolabyrinth in Temporal Bone Fracture.颞骨骨折中气迷路的发生率及临床特征
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):1048-53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000662.
3
Evaluation of Patients with Post-Traumatic Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Review of 506 Cases.创伤后听力损失患者的评估:506 例回顾性研究。
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 May;17(3):239-244. doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.9089.
4
Hearing loss in minor head injury.
Arch Otolaryngol. 1982 Aug;108(8):474-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1982.00790560012004.
5
Audiometric Outcomes in Pediatric Temporal Bone Trauma.小儿颞骨创伤的听力测定结果
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;154(1):175-80. doi: 10.1177/0194599815609114. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
6
Hearing outcomes following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛后的听力结果。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;114(6):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
7
Outcomes for conservative management of traumatic conductive hearing loss.创伤性传导性听力损失保守治疗的效果。
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Apr;29(3):344-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181690792.
8
Cost effective use of audiograms after pediatric temporal bone fractures.儿童颞骨骨折后听力图的成本效益利用
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;79(11):1926-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
9
Pediatric temporal bone fractures.小儿颞骨骨折
Laryngoscope. 1998 Jun;108(6):816-21. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199806000-00008.
10
Hearing loss in pediatric temporal bone fractures: Evaluating two radiographic classification systems as prognosticators.儿童颞骨骨折中的听力损失:评估两种放射学分类系统作为预后指标。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;109:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Patients with Post-Traumatic Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Review of 506 Cases.创伤后听力损失患者的评估:506 例回顾性研究。
J Int Adv Otol. 2021 May;17(3):239-244. doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.9089.
2
Our Experience on Temporal Bone Fractures: Retrospective Analysis of 141 Cases.我们关于颞骨骨折的经验:141例回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 8;10(2):201. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020201.
3
Hearing loss grades and the .听力损失等级与…… (原文不完整,翻译至此)
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Oct 1;97(10):725-728. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.230367. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Imaging of post-traumatic hearing loss.
Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar-Apr;60(2):119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Increased long-term risk of hearing loss in patients with traumatic brain injury: A nationwide population-based study.创伤性脑损伤患者听力损失的长期风险增加:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Nov;127(11):2627-2635. doi: 10.1002/lary.26567. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
Post traumatic deafness: a pictorial review of CT and MRI findings.创伤后耳聋:CT与MRI表现的影像综述
Insights Imaging. 2016 Jun;7(3):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0490-9. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
7
Bilateral temporal bone fractures associated with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss.双侧颞骨骨折伴双侧重度感音神经性听力损失。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 May;92(1087):302-3. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133862. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Trauma patterns, symptoms, and complications associated with external auditory canal fractures.与外耳道骨折相关的创伤模式、症状及并发症。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):1579-82. doi: 10.1002/lary.25246. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Temporal bone fractures: evaluation of 77 patients and a management algorithm.颞骨骨折:77例患者的评估及处理流程
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012 Sep;18(5):424-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.98957.
10
Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries.全球和区域听力障碍流行率:29 个国家 42 项研究的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):146-52. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr176. Epub 2011 Dec 24.