• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习模型评估影响医疗保健费用的风险因素:基于运动的 12 个月心脏康复。

Machine learning models for assessing risk factors affecting health care costs: 12-month exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.

机构信息

Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 May 28;12:1378349. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378349. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378349
PMID:38864016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11165052/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) has proven to be effective and cost-effective dominant treatment option in health care. However, the contribution of well-known risk factors for prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) to predict health care costs is not well recognized. Since machine learning (ML) applications are rapidly giving new opportunities to assist health care professionals' work, we used selected ML tools to assess the predictive value of defined risk factors for health care costs during 12-month ECR in patients with CAD.

METHODS

The data for analysis was available from a total of 71 patients referred to Oulu University Hospital, Finland, due to an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event (75% men, age 61 ± 12 years, BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m2, ejection fraction 62 ± 8, 89% have beta-blocker medication). Risk factors were assessed at the hospital immediately after the cardiac event, and health care costs for all reasons were collected from patient registers over a year. ECR was programmed in accordance with international guidelines. Risk analysis algorithms (cross-decomposition algorithms) were employed to rank risk factors based on variances in their effects. Regression analysis was used to determine the accounting value of risk factors by entering first the risk factor with the highest degree of explanation into the model. After that, the next most potent risk factor explaining costs was added to the model one by one (13 forecast models in total).

RESULTS

The ECR group used health care services during the year at an average of 1,624 ± 2,139€ per patient. Diabetes exhibited the strongest correlation with health care expenses ( = 0.406), accounting for 16% of the total costs ( < 0.001). When the next two ranked markers (body mass index;  = 0.171 and systolic blood pressure;  = - 0.162, respectively) were added to the model, the predictive value was 18% for the costs ( = 0.004). The depression scale had the weakest independent explanation rate of all 13 risk factors (explanation value 0.1%,  = 0.029,  = 0.811).

DISCUSSION

Presence of diabetes is the primary reason forecasting health care costs in 12-month ECR intervention among ACS patients. The ML tools may help decision-making when planning the optimal allocation of health care resources.

摘要

简介

基于运动的心脏康复(ECR)已被证明是有效的、具有成本效益的冠心病(CAD)主要治疗选择。然而,众所周知的 CAD 预后风险因素对预测医疗保健成本的贡献尚未得到充分认识。由于机器学习(ML)应用程序正在迅速为协助医疗保健专业人员的工作提供新的机会,因此我们使用选定的 ML 工具来评估在 CAD 患者的 12 个月 ECR 期间,定义的风险因素对医疗保健成本的预测价值。

方法

分析的数据来自芬兰奥卢大学医院因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)事件而转诊的总共 71 名患者(75%为男性,年龄 61 ± 12 岁,BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m2,射血分数 62 ± 8,89%服用β受体阻滞剂)。在心脏事件后立即在医院评估风险因素,并在一年中从患者登记处收集所有原因的医疗保健费用。ECR 根据国际指南进行编程。使用交叉分解算法对风险因素进行排名,根据其影响的差异对风险因素进行排名。回归分析用于通过首先将具有最高解释程度的风险因素输入模型来确定风险因素的核算价值。之后,一个接一个地将下一个最有力的解释成本的风险因素添加到模型中(总共 13 个预测模型)。

结果

ECR 组患者在一年内平均每人使用医疗保健服务 1624 ± 2139 欧元。糖尿病与医疗费用相关性最强(= 0.406),占总费用的 16%(< 0.001)。当添加到模型中的下两个排名标记(体重指数;= 0.171 和收缩压;= - 0.162,分别)时,成本的预测值为 18%(= 0.004)。抑郁量表是所有 13 个风险因素中独立解释率最低的(解释率为 0.1%,= 0.029,= 0.811)。

讨论

在 ACS 患者的 12 个月 ECR 干预中,糖尿病的存在是预测医疗保健成本的主要原因。ML 工具在规划最佳医疗保健资源分配时可能有助于决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7a/11165052/60bb35e59932/fpubh-12-1378349-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7a/11165052/3fa9f8cd107f/fpubh-12-1378349-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7a/11165052/60bb35e59932/fpubh-12-1378349-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7a/11165052/3fa9f8cd107f/fpubh-12-1378349-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7a/11165052/60bb35e59932/fpubh-12-1378349-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning models for assessing risk factors affecting health care costs: 12-month exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.机器学习模型评估影响医疗保健费用的风险因素:基于运动的 12 个月心脏康复。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 28;12:1378349. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378349. eCollection 2024.
2
Economic evaluation of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome.近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者运动心脏康复的经济学评估
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Nov;27(11):1395-1403. doi: 10.1111/sms.12738. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study.机器学习模型预测近期急性冠脉综合征患者的医疗费用:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023 May 13;4(4):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Cardiac Telerehabilitation With Relapse Prevention for the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in the Netherlands.荷兰的冠心病患者心脏远程康复加复发预防的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2136652. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36652.
5
Effects of cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease using a personalised patient-centred web application: protocol for the SmartCare-CAD randomised controlled trial.使用个性化的以患者为中心的网络应用程序对冠心病患者进行心脏远程康复的效果:SmartCare-CAD随机对照试验方案
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0477-6.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Chilean Patients Surviving Acute Coronary Syndrome.基于运动的心脏康复在智利急性冠状动脉综合征存活患者中的成本效益。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 May;39(3):168-174. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000356.
7
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to conventional, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: Results of the FIT@Home study.与传统的基于中心的心脏康复相比,家庭心脏康复的临床效果和成本效益:FIT@Home研究结果
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(12):1260-1273. doi: 10.1177/2047487317710803. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on non-culprit mild coronary plaques in the culprit coronary artery of patients with acute coronary syndrome.基于运动的心脏康复对急性冠状动脉综合征患者罪犯冠状动脉中非罪犯轻度冠状动脉斑块的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Jun;31(6):846-54. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
CHA2DS2-VASc score and exercise capacity of patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation programs.参与心脏康复项目的冠心病患者的CHA2DS2-VASc评分与运动能力
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Dec;28(8):697-701. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000550.
10
The impact of drop-out in cardiac rehabilitation on outcome among coronary artery disease patients.心脏康复中脱落对冠心病患者结局的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Sep;24(14):1490-1497. doi: 10.1177/2047487317724574. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2022.2022 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(1):26-43. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0085.
2
[Management of cardiovascular diseases in patients with diabetes : ESC guidelines 2023].[糖尿病患者心血管疾病的管理:2023年欧洲心脏病学会指南]
Herz. 2024 Feb;49(1):15-18. doi: 10.1007/s00059-023-05218-x. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study.机器学习模型预测近期急性冠脉综合征患者的医疗费用:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023 May 13;4(4):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2023 年 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA 慢性冠状动脉疾病患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 29;148(9):e9-e119. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
5
Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for improving depression, anxiety and distress: an overview of systematic reviews.体力活动干预对改善抑郁、焦虑和困扰的有效性:系统评价综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;57(18):1203-1209. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106195. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复:荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Feb 7;44(6):452-469. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac747.
7
Exercise as medicine for depressive symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.运动作为治疗抑郁症状的药物?系统评价和荟萃分析及荟萃回归。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;57(16):1049-1057. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106282. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
8
Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease.人工智能在心血管疾病预测模型中的应用评价。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 14;43(31):2921-2930. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac238.
9
Exercise/Physical Activity in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Statement from the American College of Sports Medicine.《美国运动医学学会关于 2 型糖尿病患者运动/体力活动的共识声明》
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Feb 1;54(2):353-368. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002800.
10
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.