Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Intra faculty unit "Cognitive Sciences", Faculty of Human Science and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Research Area Services Research and e-Health, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany
Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Intra faculty unit "Cognitive Sciences", Faculty of Human Science and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Research Area Services Research and e-Health, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany.
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;57(16):1049-1057. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106282. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
To estimate the efficacy of exercise on depressive symptoms compared with non-active control groups and to determine the moderating effects of exercise on depression and the presence of publication bias.
Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched without language restrictions from inception to 13 September2022 (PROSPERO registration no CRD42020210651).
Randomised controlled trials including participants aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder or those with depressive symptoms determined by validated screening measures scoring above the threshold value, investigating the effects of an exercise intervention (aerobic and/or resistance exercise) compared with a non-exercising control group.
Forty-one studies, comprising 2264 participants post intervention were included in the meta-analysis demonstrating large effects (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.946, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.71) favouring exercise interventions which corresponds to the number needed to treat (NNT)=2 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.59). Large effects were found in studies with individuals with major depressive disorder (SMD=-0.998, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.61, k=20), supervised exercise interventions (SMD=-1.026, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.77, k=40) and moderate effects when analyses were restricted to low risk of bias studies (SMD=-0.666, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.34, k=12, NNT=2.8 (95% CI 1.94 to 5.22)).
Exercise is efficacious in treating depression and depressive symptoms and should be offered as an evidence-based treatment option focusing on supervised and group exercise with moderate intensity and aerobic exercise regimes. The small sample sizes of many trials and high heterogeneity in methods should be considered when interpreting the results.
评估运动对抑郁症状的疗效,与非活动对照组进行比较,并确定运动对抑郁的调节作用以及是否存在发表偏倚。
系统评价和荟萃分析,包括荟萃回归。
从创建至 2022 年 9 月 13 日,无语言限制地检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、SPORTDiscus、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Web of Science。(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020210651)。
纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上、有重性抑郁障碍诊断或通过评分高于阈值的验证性筛选措施确定有抑郁症状的参与者的随机对照试验,调查运动干预(有氧运动和/或抗阻运动)与非运动对照组相比的效果。
荟萃分析纳入了 41 项研究,共 2264 名干预后参与者,结果显示运动干预效果显著(标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.946,95%置信区间(CI)-1.18 至-0.71),相当于需要治疗的人数(NNT)=2(95%CI 1.68 至 2.59)。在有重性抑郁障碍的个体(SMD=-0.998,95%CI-1.39 至-0.61,k=20)、接受监督的运动干预(SMD=-1.026,95%CI-1.28 至-0.77,k=40)的研究中发现了较大的效果,当分析仅限于低偏倚风险的研究时,效果中等(SMD=-0.666,95%CI-0.99 至-0.34,k=12,NNT=2.8(95%CI 1.94 至 5.22))。
运动对治疗抑郁和抑郁症状是有效的,应作为一种基于证据的治疗选择提供,重点是监督和小组运动,运动强度适中,采用有氧运动方案。在解释结果时,应考虑到许多试验的样本量小且方法异质性高。