Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep;29(9):1364-1379. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02559-3. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Evidence regarding chemosensitivity to different therapeutic regimens in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains limited. This study aimed to investigate EOC implementation in daily clinical practice and reveal favorable regimens for EOC among Japanese patients.
We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients newly diagnosed with EOC from 2012 to 2021 at our affiliated institutions. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of conventional paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) vs. dose-dense TC (ddTC) according to the eligibility of GOG262 and JGOG3016 and those with bevacizumab (BEV) vs. without BEV based on GOG218. Further, we evaluated OS and PFS of ddTC and ddTC + BEV to TC + BEV among patients with stage III/IV.
The ddTC group (n = 402) demonstrated longer PFS and OS than the TC group (n = 165) (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs] [95% confidential intervals (CIs)]: 0.69 [0.55-0.88] and 0.67 [0.50-0.90], respectively). The group with BEV (n = 158) demonstrated a longer PFS than those without BEV (n = 296) (0.74 [0.57-0.95]), but not for OS (0.84 [0.60-1.17]). The ddTC and ddTC + BEV groups (n = 259 and 117) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS than the TC + BEV group (n = 75) (1.09 [0.79-1.50] and 0.74 [0.52-1.08] for PFS and 0.89 [0.59-1.34] and 0.73 [0.50-1.05] for OS, respectively).
Our study may indicate ddTC, BEV, and their combination regimen as the promising first-line chemotherapy option among Japanese patients with advanced EOC.
上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)对不同治疗方案的化疗敏感性的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在调查日本患者 EOC 临床实践中的实施情况,并揭示对 EOC 有效的治疗方案。
我们回顾性收集了 2012 年至 2021 年在我院附属机构新诊断为 EOC 的患者的临床数据。根据 GOG262 和 JGOG3016 的入组标准,我们评估了常规紫杉醇加卡铂(TC)与剂量密集型 TC(ddTC)以及有无贝伐珠单抗(BEV)的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS);根据 GOG218,我们评估了 III/IV 期患者中 ddTC 和 ddTC+BEV 与 TC+BEV 的 OS 和 PFS。
ddTC 组(n=402)的 PFS 和 OS 均长于 TC 组(n=165)(调整后的风险比[95%置信区间(CI)]:0.69 [0.55-0.88]和 0.67 [0.50-0.90])。有 BEV(n=158)的患者的 PFS 长于无 BEV(n=296)的患者(0.74 [0.57-0.95]),但 OS 无差异(0.84 [0.60-1.17])。ddTC 组、ddTC+BEV 组(n=259、117)的 PFS 和 OS 与 TC+BEV 组(n=75)相比无统计学差异(PFS:1.09 [0.79-1.50]和 0.74 [0.52-1.08];OS:0.89 [0.59-1.34]和 0.73 [0.50-1.05])。
本研究可能表明 ddTC、BEV 及其联合方案是日本晚期 EOC 患者有前途的一线化疗选择。