• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in Patients With Lichen Planopilaris.患有毛囊性扁平苔藓患者的流行情况和治疗模式。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Aug 1;160(8):865-868. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445.
2
A case series of 46 patients with lichen planopilaris: Demographics, clinical evaluation, and treatment experience.46例扁平苔藓样毛发角化病患者的病例系列:人口统计学、临床评估及治疗经验
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Jun;26(3):275-9. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2014.933165. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
3
Prevalence and treatment patterns of lichen planus.扁平苔藓的患病率及治疗模式
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):717-723. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.081. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Secukinumab in adult patients with lichen planus: efficacy and safety results from the randomized placebo-controlled proof-of-concept PRELUDE study.司库奇尤单抗治疗成人扁平苔藓:随机安慰剂对照概念验证性PRELUDE研究的疗效和安全性结果
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Oct 17;191(5):680-690. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae181.
5
Tofacitinib for the treatment of lichen planopilaris: A case series.托法替尼治疗扁平苔藓样毛囊炎:病例系列。
Dermatol Ther. 2018 Nov;31(6):e12656. doi: 10.1111/dth.12656. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
Lichen planopilaris in a Latin American (Chilean) population: demographics, clinical profile and treatment experience.拉丁美洲(智利)人群中的扁平苔藓样毛发角化病:人口统计学、临床特征及治疗经验
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017 Oct;42(7):755-759. doi: 10.1111/ced.13203. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Frontal fibrosing alopecia demographics: a survey of 29 patients.额部纤维性秃发的人口统计学特征:29例患者的调查
Cutis. 2019 Feb;103(2):E16-E22.
8
The role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of lichen planopilaris: A retrospective case series and review.羟氯喹在扁平苔藓样毛发角化病治疗中的作用:一项回顾性病例系列研究及文献综述
Dermatol Ther. 2017 May;30(3). doi: 10.1111/dth.12463. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
9
Lichen Planopilaris in Women: A Retrospective Review of 232 Women Seen at Mayo Clinic From 1992 to 2016.女性毛囊性扁平苔藓:梅奥诊所 1992 年至 2016 年间就诊的 232 例女性回顾性研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Aug;95(8):1684-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.02.028.
10
Incidence estimates for lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia in a New York City health care system.在纽约市医疗体系中,估计患有扁平苔藓样瘢痕性脱发和额部纤维性脱发的发生率。
Dermatol Online J. 2021 Aug 15;27(8). doi: 10.5070/D327854687.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-cell sequencing combined with spatial transcriptomics reveals the characteristics of follicle-targeted inflammation patterns in primary cicatricial alopecia.单细胞测序结合空间转录组学揭示原发性瘢痕性脱发中毛囊靶向炎症模式的特征。
Cell Biosci. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13578-025-01447-1.
2
Safety of Alopecia Treatments in Patients with Breast Cancer and High-Risk Women: A Review.乳腺癌患者及高危女性脱发治疗的安全性:综述
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00961-9.
3
The 100 Most-Cited Publications in Lichen Planopilaris: A Bibliometric Analysis.扁平苔藓样毛发角化病领域被引用次数最多的100篇出版物:一项文献计量分析。
Skin Appendage Disord. 2025 Jun;11(3):245-254. doi: 10.1159/000542898. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

患有毛囊性扁平苔藓患者的流行情况和治疗模式。

Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in Patients With Lichen Planopilaris.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York.

Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Aug 1;160(8):865-868. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445
PMID:38865116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170449/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a form of scarring alopecia associated with progressive, permanent hair loss. Symptoms range from burning pain to itching, also carrying substantial psychological morbidity. Yet, disease characteristics, pathophysiology, and effective treatment data are limited, making treatment a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and dermatologist-prescribed treatment patterns of LPP among US adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used the Explorys database. The prevalence analysis used a 15% random sample and identified US adults with LPP diagnoses between 2017 and 2019. The LPP treatment analysis included all patients with LPP diagnoses between 2016 and 2020 and a dermatologist encounter in the first year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to April 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes of the prevalence analysis were the crude and standardized prevalence estimates of US adults with LPP across age, sex, and racial groups. The main outcomes of the treatment analysis were the frequency of LPP treatments within 1 year of diagnosis, and the number of patients who continued treatment beyond 1 year, switched treatments, and combined treatments.

RESULTS

Among 1 466 832 eligible patients analyzed for prevalence, 241 patients had an LPP diagnosis (222 [92.1%] female; median [IQR] age, 64 [54-73] years). Standardized overall prevalence was 13.4 per 100 000 (95% CI, 11.7-15.1). In the treatment analysis, 991 patients had an LPP diagnosis (907 [91.5%] female; median (IQR) age, 60 [47-69] years). Most received at least 1 type of medication (635 [64.1%]), most frequently intralesional corticosteroids (370 [37.3%]) and topical corticosteroids (342 [34.5%]), followed by doxycycline (104 [10.5%]) and hydroxychloroquine (72 [7.3%]). Treatment continued beyond 1 year in 71 of 200 patients (35.5%) prescribed intralesional corticosteroids and 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine. Treatment switching at 1 year occurred in 32 of 254 patients (12.6%) first prescribed an intralesional corticosteroid and in 44 of 194 (22.7%) first prescribed a topical corticosteroid. Combinations of 2 or 3 treatment types were given to 137 (13.8%) and 74 (7.5%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study reported prevalence and treatment patterns for US adults with LPP in a representative sample. Most patients with LPP received treatment, and many received multiple treatment types and switched treatments, suggesting further research into medication selection offers clinical benefit.

摘要

重要性

扁平苔藓性瘢痕性脱发 (LPP) 是一种与进行性、永久性脱发相关的瘢痕性脱发。症状范围从灼痛到瘙痒不等,还伴有严重的心理发病。然而,疾病特征、病理生理学和有效治疗数据有限,使治疗成为一个挑战。

目的

描述美国成年人中 LPP 的患病率和皮肤科医生开具的治疗模式。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项使用 Explorys 数据库的横断面研究。患病率分析使用了 15%的随机样本,并确定了 2017 年至 2019 年间患有 LPP 诊断的美国成年人。LPP 治疗分析包括 2016 年至 2020 年间所有患有 LPP 诊断的患者,以及诊断后第一年的皮肤科医生就诊。数据于 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月进行分析。

主要结果和措施

患病率分析的主要结果是 LPP 患者在年龄、性别和种族群体中的粗患病率和标准化患病率估计。治疗分析的主要结果是诊断后 1 年内 LPP 治疗的频率,以及继续治疗超过 1 年、更换治疗、联合治疗的患者数量。

结果

在分析的 1466832 名符合条件的患者中,有 241 名患者患有 LPP 诊断(222 名 [92.1%] 为女性;中位 [IQR] 年龄为 64 [54-73] 岁)。总体标准化患病率为每 10 万人 13.4 例(95%CI,11.7-15.1)。在治疗分析中,有 991 名患者患有 LPP 诊断(907 名 [91.5%] 为女性;中位 [IQR] 年龄为 60 [47-69] 岁)。大多数患者至少接受了 1 种药物治疗(635 名 [64.1%]),最常接受的是皮损内皮质类固醇(370 名 [37.3%])和外用皮质类固醇(342 名 [34.5%]),其次是多西环素(104 名 [10.5%])和羟氯喹(72 名 [7.3%])。在 200 名接受皮损内皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,有 71 名(35.5%)和 29 名接受羟氯喹治疗的患者(24.1%)继续治疗超过 1 年。在首次接受皮损内皮质类固醇治疗的 254 名患者中有 32 名(12.6%)和首次接受外用皮质类固醇治疗的 194 名患者中有 44 名(22.7%)发生了治疗转换。137 名(13.8%)和 74 名(7.5%)患者分别接受了 2 种或 3 种治疗类型的联合治疗。

结论和相关性

这项横断面研究报告了代表性样本中美国成年人 LPP 的患病率和治疗模式。大多数患有 LPP 的患者接受了治疗,许多患者接受了多种治疗类型并更换了治疗方法,这表明进一步研究药物选择可以带来临床益处。