Krulwich T A, Agus R, Schneier M, Guffanti A A
J Bacteriol. 1985 May;162(2):768-72. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.2.768-772.1985.
Cytoplasmic buffering capacities and buffering by whole cells were examined in six bacterial species: Bacillus acidocaldarius, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus alcalophilus, and Bacillus firmus RAB. Acid-base titrations were conducted on whole cells and cells permeabilized with Triton X-100 or n-butanol. In all of the species examined, the buffering capacity of intact cells was generally a significant proportion of the total buffering capacity, but the magnitude of the buffering capacity varied from species to species. Over the entire range of pH values from 4 to 9.5, B. subtilis exhibited a cytoplasmic buffering capacity that was much higher than that of B. stearothermophilus, B. acidocaldarius, or E. coli. The latter three species had comparable cytoplasmic buffering capacities at pH 4 to 9.5, as long as optimal conditions for cell permeabilization were employed. All of the nonalkalophiles exhibited a decrease in cytoplasmic buffering capacity as the external pH increased from pH 5 to 7. At alkaline pH values, the two thermophiles in the study had particularly low cytoplasmic buffering capacities, and the two alkalophilic bacteria had appreciably higher cytoplasmic buffering capacities than any of the other species studied. Cytoplasmic buffering capacities as high as 1,100 nmol of H+ per pH unit per mg of protein were observed in alkalophilic B. firmus RAB. Since previous studies have shown that immediate cytoplasmic alkalinization occurs upon loss of the active mechanisms for pH homeostasis in the alkalophiles, the very high buffering capacities apparently offer no global protection of internal pH. Perhaps, the high buffering capacities reflect protective mechanisms for specific macromolecules or process rather than part of the mechanisms for bulk pH homeostasis.
对六种细菌进行了细胞质缓冲能力和全细胞缓冲能力的检测,这六种细菌分别是嗜酸热芽孢杆菌、嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌、大肠杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、嗜碱芽孢杆菌和坚强芽孢杆菌RAB。对全细胞以及用 Triton X - 100 或正丁醇通透处理的细胞进行了酸碱滴定。在所检测的所有物种中,完整细胞的缓冲能力通常占总缓冲能力的很大一部分,但缓冲能力的大小因物种而异。在 pH 值从 4 到 9.5 的整个范围内,枯草芽孢杆菌的细胞质缓冲能力远高于嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌、嗜酸热芽孢杆菌或大肠杆菌。只要采用细胞通透的最佳条件,后三种物种在 pH 4 到 9.5 时具有相当的细胞质缓冲能力。随着外部 pH 值从 5 增加到 7,所有非嗜碱菌的细胞质缓冲能力均下降。在碱性 pH 值下,研究中的两种嗜热菌的细胞质缓冲能力特别低,而两种嗜碱菌的细胞质缓冲能力明显高于所研究的其他任何物种。在嗜碱的坚强芽孢杆菌RAB中观察到细胞质缓冲能力高达每毫克蛋白质每 pH 单位 1100 nmol H⁺。由于先前的研究表明,嗜碱菌中 pH 稳态的活性机制丧失后会立即发生细胞质碱化,因此非常高的缓冲能力显然并不能全局保护内部 pH。也许,高缓冲能力反映的是对特定大分子或过程的保护机制,而不是整体 pH 稳态机制的一部分。