Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):255. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02974-0.
Differences in clinical manifestations and biological underpinnings between Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) onset during adolescence and adulthood have been posited in previous studies, implying an influential role of age of onset (AOO) in the clinical subtyping and therapeutic approaches to MDD. However, direct comparisons between the two cohorts and their age-matched controls have been lacking in extant investigations. In this investigation, 156 volunteers participated, comprising 46 adolescents with MDD (adolescent-onset group), 35 adults with MDD (adult-onset group), 19 healthy adolescents, and 56 healthy adults. Resting-state functional MRI scans were undergone by all participants. Large-scale network analyses were applied. Subsequently, a 2 × 2 ANOVA was employed to analyze the main effects of diagnosis, age, and their interaction effect on functional connectivity (FC). Furthermore, regression analysis was employed to scrutinize the association between anomalous FC and HAMD sub-scores. Increased FC in visual network (VN), limbic network (LN), VN-dorsal attention network (DAN), VN-LN, and LN-Default Mode (DMN) was found in both adolescent-onset and adult-onset MDD; however, the increased FC in DAN and LN were only found in adult-onset MDD and the decreased FC in DAN was only found in adolescent-onset MDD. Additionally, the relationship between HAMD factor 1 anxiety somatization and altered FC of DAN, VN, and VN-DAN was moderated by AOO. In conclusion, shared and distinctive large-scale network alterations in adolescent-onset and adult-onset MDD patients were suggested by our findings, providing valuable contributions towards refining clinical subtyping and treatment approaches for MDD.
先前的研究提出,青少年期和成年期首发的重度抑郁症(MDD)在临床表现和生物学基础方面存在差异,这意味着发病年龄(AOO)对 MDD 的临床亚型和治疗方法有重要影响。然而,现有研究中缺乏对这两个队列及其年龄匹配对照者的直接比较。在这项研究中,共有 156 名志愿者参与,包括 46 名青少年期首发 MDD 患者(青少年组)、35 名成年期首发 MDD 患者(成年组)、19 名健康青少年和 56 名健康成年人。所有参与者都接受了静息态功能磁共振扫描。应用了大规模网络分析。随后,采用 2×2 ANOVA 分析诊断、年龄及其相互作用对功能连接(FC)的主要影响。此外,还采用回归分析来研究异常 FC 与 HAMD 子量表评分之间的关系。在青少年和成年首发 MDD 患者中均发现视觉网络(VN)、边缘网络(LN)、VN-背侧注意网络(DAN)、VN-LN 和 LN-默认模式网络(DMN)的 FC 增加;然而,DAN 和 LN 的 FC 增加仅在成年首发 MDD 患者中发现,DAN 的 FC 减少仅在青少年首发 MDD 患者中发现。此外,HAMD 因子 1 焦虑躯体化与 DAN、VN 和 VN-DAN 异常 FC 的关系受到 AOO 的调节。总之,我们的研究结果提示青少年和成年首发 MDD 患者存在共享和独特的大规模网络改变,为完善 MDD 的临床亚型和治疗方法提供了有价值的贡献。