Suppr超能文献

不同根管冲洗液的表面张力及根-牙本质表面接触角的评估

Evaluation of surface tensions and root-dentin surface contact angles of different endodontic irrigation solutions.

作者信息

Buyukozer Ozkan Hatice, Terlemez Arslan, Batibay Ahmet Burcin, Erdogan Hilal, Kont Cobankara Funda

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Konaklı Mah. Mustafa Kemal Blv. No:82 Alanya, Antalya, Türkiye.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04453-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surface tension and contact angle properties, which play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of irrigation solutions in penetrating dentin surfaces and dentin tubules, are highly important for the development of new irrigation solutions and their preferences. The aim of the current study was to compare the surface tension and contact angle properties of different irrigation solutions used in endodontics, both on the dentin surface and within dentin tubules.

METHODS

In this study, the contact angles and surface tensions of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 5% boric acid (BA), 0.02% hypochlorous acid (HOCl), 0.2% chlorine dioxide (ClO), Biopure MTAD, QMix solutions, and distilled water (control group) were measured. Measurements were conducted using a goniometer device (Attension Theta Lite Tensiometer, Biolin Scientific, USA), employing the sessile drop method for contact angle measurements on pre-prepared dentin surfaces, and the pendant drop method for surface tension.

RESULTS

Contact angle measurements revealed no statistically significant differences between the contact angle values of MTAD, ClO, and CHX or between NaOCl, QMix, BA, and HOCl (p > 0.05). However, EDTA exhibited a significantly greater contact angle than did MTAD, ClO, CHX, NaOCl, QMix, BA, and HOCl (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the contact angle of dentin with distilled water was greater than that with all other solutions tested (p < 0.05). Surface tension measurements revealed that the surface tension values of QMix and MTAD were statistically similar (p > 0.05). CHX exhibited lower surface tension than distilled water and HOCl (p < 0.05), and it also had lower surface tension than ClO, NaOCl, and BA (p < 0.05). Additionally, the surface tension of the samples treated with EDTA was greater than that of all other solutions tested (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The direct linear relationship between the surface tension of liquids and contact angles on different surfaces may not always hold true, and these values should be considered independently for each solution on various surfaces. Considering the contact angles and surface tension properties of irrigation solutions with root canal dentin, it can be suggested for clinical use that ClO could be recommended over NaOCl, and similarly, BA could be recommended over EDTA.

摘要

背景

表面张力和接触角特性在确定冲洗液渗透牙本质表面和牙本质小管的有效性方面起着关键作用,对于新型冲洗液的开发及其偏好具有高度重要性。本研究的目的是比较牙髓病学中使用的不同冲洗液在牙本质表面和牙本质小管内的表面张力和接触角特性。

方法

在本研究中,测量了5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、2%氯己定(CHX)、5%硼酸(BA)、0.02%次氯酸(HOCl)、0.2%二氧化氯(ClO)、Biopure MTAD、QMix溶液和蒸馏水(对照组)的接触角和表面张力。使用测角仪装置(美国Biolin Scientific公司的Attension Theta Lite张力仪)进行测量,采用静滴法在预先制备的牙本质表面测量接触角,采用悬滴法测量表面张力。

结果

接触角测量结果显示,MTAD、ClO和CHX的接触角值之间或NaOCl、QMix、BA和HOCl的接触角值之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,EDTA的接触角显著大于MTAD、ClO、CHX、NaOCl、QMix、BA和HOCl(p<0.05)。此外,牙本质与蒸馏水的接触角大于与所有其他测试溶液的接触角(p<0.05)。表面张力测量结果显示,QMix和MTAD的表面张力值在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。CHX的表面张力低于蒸馏水和HOCl(p<0.05),也低于ClO、NaOCl和BA(p<0.05)。此外,用EDTA处理的样品的表面张力大于所有其他测试溶液的表面张力(p<0.05)。

结论

液体表面张力与不同表面接触角之间的直接线性关系可能并不总是成立,对于各种表面上的每种溶液,这些值应独立考虑。考虑到冲洗液与根管牙本质的接触角和表面张力特性,临床应用中可以建议推荐使用ClO而非NaOCl,同样,推荐使用BA而非EDTA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验