Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Oct;36(10):1426-1436. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13272. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
To evaluate the influence of air-abrasion of enamel with three different desensitizing powders on the whitening effect of a bleaching gel containing 40% HO, which was used for in-office tooth bleaching.
Forty human incisors, extracted and prepared, were acquired for this study and subsequently randomized into four groups (n = 10). The control group specimens underwent no pretreatment prior to the bleaching procedure, whereas the remaining three groups underwent air abrasion using distinct desensitizing powders; (a) Sylc, which contains bioglass 45S5; (b) BioMinF, which contains calcium phospho-fluoro-silicate glass; and (c) MI Pearls, which contains nano-hydroxyapatite, 1 h preceding the Opalescence Boost PF 40% bleaching procedure. Color measurements were conducted using a double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer at four distinct time points (prior to bleaching, 24 h, 15 days, and 30 days post-bleaching).
Tooth color change outcomes revealed that there were no statistically significant results with respect to the interaction of the two criteria (treatments and time) (p = 0.990). Additionally, there were no statistically significant results with respect to the main effects of treatments (p = 0.385), while there were statistically significant effects with respect to the time criterion (p = 0.013).
The use of the tested desensitizing powders prior the bleaching procedure did not affect the tooth color change induced by the tested bleaching agent.
Tooth color change and whiteness are not affected by air-abrasion desensitizing treatments when applied prior to in-office bleaching procedures.
评估三种不同脱敏粉对含有 40%HO 的漂白凝胶美白效果的影响,该凝胶用于诊室牙齿漂白。
本研究共采集 40 个人工制备的离体切牙,随机分为四组(n=10)。对照组标本在漂白程序前不进行预处理,而其余三组在漂白程序前 1 小时分别使用不同的脱敏粉进行空气喷砂处理:(a)Sylc,含生物玻璃 45S5;(b)BioMinF,含钙磷氟硅玻璃;(c)MI Pearls,含纳米羟基磷灰石。使用双光束紫外可见分光光度计在四个不同时间点(漂白前、24 小时、15 天和 30 天漂白后)进行颜色测量。
牙齿颜色变化结果表明,两个标准(处理和时间)的相互作用没有统计学意义(p=0.990)。此外,处理的主要效果没有统计学意义(p=0.385),而时间标准有统计学意义(p=0.013)。
在漂白程序前使用测试的脱敏粉不会影响测试的漂白剂引起的牙齿颜色变化。
在诊室漂白程序前应用空气喷砂脱敏处理不会影响牙齿颜色变化和美白效果。