Wu Yougui
Population Health Science, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Florida, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2025;35(4):624-640. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2358803. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
The accuracy of a screening test is often measured by the area under the receiver characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of a screening test. Two-phase designs have been widely used in diagnostic studies for estimating one single AUC and comparing two AUCs where the screening test results are measured for a large sample (Phase one sample) while the disease status is only verified for a subset of Phase one sample (Phase two sample) by a gold standard. In this paper, we consider the optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing the performance of two ordinal screening tests in classifying disease status. Specifically, we derive an analytical variance formula for the AUC difference estimator and use it to find the optimal sampling probabilities that minimize the variance formula for the AUC difference estimator. According to the proposed optimal two-phase design, the strata with the levels of two tests far apart from each other should be over-sampled while the strata with the levels of two tests close to each other should be under-sampled. Simulation results indicate that two-phase sampling under optimal allocation (OA) achieves a substantial amount of variance reduction, compared with two-phase sampling under proportional allocation (PA). Furthermore, in comparison with a one-phase random sampling, two-phase sampling under OA or PA has a clear advantage in reducing the variance of AUC difference estimator when the variances of the two screening test results in the disease population differ greatly from their counterparts in non-disease population.
筛查试验的准确性通常通过筛查试验的接受者特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量。两阶段设计已广泛应用于诊断研究中,用于估计单个AUC以及比较两个AUC,其中对大量样本(第一阶段样本)测量筛查试验结果,而仅通过金标准对第一阶段样本的一个子集(第二阶段样本)验证疾病状态。在本文中,我们考虑用于比较两种有序筛查试验在疾病状态分类中性能的最优两阶段抽样设计。具体而言,我们推导了AUC差异估计量的解析方差公式,并使用它来找到使AUC差异估计量的方差公式最小化的最优抽样概率。根据所提出的最优两阶段设计,两种试验水平彼此相距较远的层应进行过抽样,而两种试验水平彼此接近的层应进行欠抽样。模拟结果表明,与按比例分配(PA)下的两阶段抽样相比,最优分配(OA)下的两阶段抽样实现了大量的方差减少。此外,与一阶段随机抽样相比,当疾病人群中两种筛查试验结果的方差与非疾病人群中的方差差异很大时,OA或PA下的两阶段抽样在降低AUC差异估计量的方差方面具有明显优势。