Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria -
Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jun;90(6):491-499. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17921-7.
Epidural analgesia (EA) is well-accepted for pain relief during labor. Still, the impact on neonatal short-term outcome is under continuous debate. This study assessed the outcome of neonates in deliveries with and without EA in a nationwide cohort.
We analyzed the National Birth Registry of Austria between 2008 and 2017 of primiparous women with vaginal birth of singleton pregnancies. Neonatal short-term morbidity was assessed by arterial cord pH and base excess (BE). Secondary outcomes were admission to a neonatological intensive care unit, APGAR scores, and perinatal mortality. Propensity score-adjusted regression models were used to investigate the association of EA with short-term neonatal outcome.
Of 247,536 included deliveries, 52 153 received EA (21%). Differences in pH (7.24 vs. 7.25; 97.5% CI -0.0066 to -0.0047) and BE (-5.89±3.2 vs. -6.15±3.2 mmol/L; 97.5% CI 0.32 to 0.40) with EA could be shown. APGAR score at five minutes <7 was more frequent with EA (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.63). Admission to a neonatological intensive care unit occurred more often with EA (4.7% vs. 3.4%) with an OR for EA of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.26). EA was not associated with perinatal mortality (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.25).
EA showed no clinically relevant association with neonatal short-term outcome. Higher rates of NICU admission and APGAR score after five minutes <7 were observed with EA. The overall use of EA in Austria is low, and an investigation of causes may be indicated.
硬膜外镇痛(EA)在分娩过程中被广泛用于缓解疼痛。然而,其对新生儿短期结局的影响仍在持续争论中。本研究通过全国性队列评估了分娩时使用和不使用 EA 的新生儿结局。
我们分析了奥地利国家出生登记处 2008 年至 2017 年期间初产妇阴道分娩的单胎妊娠。通过动脉脐带 pH 值和碱剩余(BE)评估新生儿短期发病率。次要结局为入住新生儿重症监护病房、APGAR 评分和围产儿死亡率。使用倾向评分调整回归模型来研究 EA 与新生儿短期结局的关联。
在纳入的 247536 次分娩中,52153 次接受了 EA(21%)。可以看出,EA 组的 pH 值(7.24 与 7.25;97.5%CI-0.0066 至-0.0047)和 BE(-5.89±3.2 与-6.15±3.2mmol/L;97.5%CI0.32 至 0.40)存在差异。EA 组 5 分钟时 APGAR 评分<7 的情况更为常见(OR1.45;95%CI:1.29 至 1.63)。EA 组入住新生儿重症监护病房的比例更高(4.7%与 3.4%),EA 的 OR 为 1.2(95%CI:1.14 至 1.26)。EA 与围产儿死亡率无关(OR1.33;95%CI:0.79 至 2.25)。
EA 与新生儿短期结局无明显临床相关性。EA 组新生儿入住 NICU 比例和 5 分钟时 APGAR 评分<7 的比例较高。奥地利 EA 的总体使用率较低,可能需要对其原因进行调查。