Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
VA Advanced Imaging Research Center, San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gerontologist. 2024 Aug 1;64(8). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae075.
Amyloid positron emission tomography scans can enhance the accuracy of dementia diagnoses. However, the perspectives and experiences of people with cognitive impairment and their care partners undergoing an amyloid scan are less well understood. Therefore, this review aimed to identify and summarize qualitative studies exploring patient and care partner experiences of undergoing an amyloid scan.
We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and PsychInfo in March 2024. Articles were screened for inclusion by 2 reviewers and critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Qualitative Studies. Data from the included studies were synthesized using thematic synthesis.
We identified 10 papers from 6 studies. We identified 4 themes: (1) motivations for undergoing an amyloid scan, (2) experiences of receiving the result, (3) emotional responses to the result, and (4) actions in light of the scan result. Participants reported undergoing the scan to determine the cause of cognitive impairment. They described the information gained from the scan as helpful but struggled to recall the correct terminology or implications of the scan. Emotional responses to the scan varied depending on the scan result. In light of the scan result, the most common action was making advanced plans; however, this was mainly discussed among participants with elevated amyloid.
Amyloid scans can provide useful and actionable information. However, learning the scan result could be distressing. Future research is needed to balance the potential benefits and harms of amyloid scans.
淀粉样 PET 扫描可以提高痴呆症诊断的准确性。然而,认知障碍患者及其护理伙伴在接受淀粉样扫描时的观点和体验却知之甚少。因此,本综述旨在确定并总结探索患者和护理伙伴接受淀粉样扫描体验的定性研究。
我们于 2024 年 3 月在 Embase、MEDLINE 和 PsychInfo 上进行了搜索。由两名评审员筛选文章是否符合纳入标准,并使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所定性研究批判性评估工具对其进行批判性评估。使用主题合成对纳入研究的数据进行综合。
我们从 6 项研究中确定了 10 篇论文。我们确定了 4 个主题:(1)接受淀粉样扫描的动机,(2)接受结果的经验,(3)对结果的情绪反应,(4)根据扫描结果采取的行动。参与者报告说接受扫描是为了确定认知障碍的原因。他们描述了从扫描中获得的信息很有帮助,但很难回忆起扫描的正确术语或含义。对扫描的情绪反应取决于扫描结果。根据扫描结果,最常见的行动是制定高级计划;然而,这主要是在有淀粉样蛋白升高的参与者中讨论的。
淀粉样扫描可以提供有用且可采取行动的信息。然而,了解扫描结果可能会带来困扰。未来的研究需要平衡淀粉样扫描的潜在益处和危害。