• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解患者及其重要他人对启动痴呆诊断轨迹的偏好:综合评价。

Understanding patients' and significant others' preferences on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia: An integrative review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):862-875. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084505. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2022.2084505
PMID:35763442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10166060/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the preferences of people with memory complaints (PwMC) and their significant others regarding starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase. Selection of abstracts and papers was performed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Result sections of the selected papers were thematically synthesized.

RESULTS

From 2497 citations, seven qualitative studies and two mixed methods studies published between 2010 and 2020 were included. Overall quality of the studies was high to moderate. A thematic synthesis showed that preferences for starting a diagnostic trajectory arose from the feeling of needing to do something about the symptoms, beliefs on the necessity and expected outcomes of starting a diagnostic trajectory. These views were influenced by normalization or validation of symptoms, the support or wishes of the social network, interactions with health care professionals, the health status of the PwMC, and societal factors such as stigma and socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION

A variety of considerations with regard to decision-making on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia were identified. This emphasizes the need to explore individual preferences to facilitate a timely dementia diagnosis.

摘要

目的

探索有记忆主诉的人(PwMC)及其重要他人对启动痴呆诊断轨迹的偏好。

方法

在 PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Embase 中进行了系统文献检索。两名研究人员独立进行了摘要和论文的选择。使用混合方法评估工具评估了方法学质量。对选定论文的结果部分进行了主题综合。

结果

从 2497 条引文中,纳入了 2010 年至 2020 年期间发表的 7 项定性研究和 2 项混合方法研究。研究的总体质量较高至中等。主题综合表明,启动诊断轨迹的偏好源于对症状采取行动的需求感、对启动诊断轨迹的必要性和预期结果的信念。这些观点受到症状的正常化或验证、社交网络的支持或愿望、与医疗保健专业人员的互动、PwMC 的健康状况以及污名化和社会经济地位等社会因素的影响。

结论

确定了与启动痴呆诊断轨迹的决策相关的多种考虑因素。这强调了需要探索个体偏好以促进及时的痴呆诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6103/10166060/34c2f80a32a2/CAMH_A_2084505_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6103/10166060/bb45e8e89fa2/CAMH_A_2084505_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6103/10166060/34c2f80a32a2/CAMH_A_2084505_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6103/10166060/bb45e8e89fa2/CAMH_A_2084505_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6103/10166060/34c2f80a32a2/CAMH_A_2084505_F0002_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding patients' and significant others' preferences on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia: An integrative review.理解患者及其重要他人对启动痴呆诊断轨迹的偏好:综合评价。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):862-875. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084505. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
8
9
Regional cerebral blood flow single photon emission computed tomography for detection of Frontotemporal dementia in people with suspected dementia.用于检测疑似痴呆患者额颞叶痴呆的局部脑血流单光子发射计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD010896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010896.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of meaningful occupation interventions for people living with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review.针对居住在老年护理机构中的痴呆症患者的有意义职业干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Dec;14(12):163-225. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003230.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to Diagnosis in Dementia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.痴呆症的诊断时间:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;40(7):e70129. doi: 10.1002/gps.70129.
2
From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes.从认知能力下降的怀疑到痴呆症诊断:对医疗保健专业人员的考量与态度的系统评价
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf176.
3
Biomarker-Driven Diagnosis in Neurocognitive Disorders: A Clinician's Perspective on the Risks of Reductionism.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial.实施针对有记忆主诉的患者及其全科医生的诊断决策辅助工具:一项前后试点试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e049322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322.
2
2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2021 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Mar;17(3):327-406. doi: 10.1002/alz.12328. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Attitudes towards prediction and early diagnosis of late-onset dementia: a comparison of tested persons and family caregivers.
神经认知障碍中基于生物标志物的诊断:临床医生对还原论风险的看法
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;15(3):e200481. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200481. Epub 2025 May 2.
4
Persons With Cognitive Impairment and Care Partner Motivations and Experiences of Undergoing an Amyloid Scan: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.认知障碍患者及其照顾者接受淀粉样蛋白扫描的动机和体验:系统评价定性研究。
Gerontologist. 2024 Aug 1;64(8). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae075.
5
The expectations and experiences of patients regarding the diagnostic workup at a specialized memory clinic: An interview study.患者对专科记忆门诊诊断检查的期望和体验:一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14021. doi: 10.1111/hex.14021.
6
Why to test for dementia: perspectives of patients, significant others and general practitioners.为什么要进行痴呆症检测:患者、重要他人和全科医生的观点。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jan 2;53(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad251.
7
The memory clinic and psychosocial intervention: Translating past promise into current practices.记忆诊所与心理社会干预:将过去的承诺转化为当前的实践。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 4;4:1052244. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1052244. eCollection 2023.
对迟发性痴呆的预测和早期诊断的态度:测试者和家庭照顾者的比较。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 May;25(5):832-843. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1727851. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Persistent barriers and facilitators to seeking help for a dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of 30 years of the perspectives of carers and people with dementia.痴呆症诊断寻求帮助的持续障碍与促进因素:对30年来护理人员和痴呆症患者观点的系统综述
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 May;32(5):611-634. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219002229. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project.诊断检查期间的医患沟通:ABIDE项目。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Jul 29;11:520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Relational experiences of people seeking help and assessment for subjective cognitive concern and memory loss.寻求帮助和评估主观认知问题和记忆丧失的人的关系体验。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1356-1364. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1592111. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Caregivers' Experience of Decision-Making regarding Diagnostic Assessment following Cognitive Screening of Older Adults.照顾者在对老年人进行认知筛查后进行诊断评估决策时的经历。
J Aging Res. 2018 Dec 2;2018:8352816. doi: 10.1155/2018/8352816. eCollection 2018.
8
Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol.成人阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的患者参与、治疗偏好与共同决策:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267.
9
What is a 'timely' diagnosis? Exploring the preferences of Australian health service consumers regarding when a diagnosis of dementia should be disclosed.什么是“及时”诊断?探究澳大利亚医疗服务消费者对于何时应披露痴呆症诊断的偏好。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3409-y.
10
Primary Care Physicians' Perceived Barriers to Optimal Dementia Care: A Systematic Review.初级保健医生对优化痴呆症护理的认知障碍:系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2019 Nov 16;59(6):e697-e708. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny067.