Suppr超能文献

氢化可的松、抗坏血酸和硫胺素联合治疗脓毒症和感染性休克的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2024;185(10):997-1018. doi: 10.1159/000538959. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

We conducted a database search in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HAT against placebo/standard of care or against hydrocortisone in sepsis/septic shock patients. Outcomes included mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), vasopressor durations, mechanical ventilation durations, change in SOFA at 72 h, and adverse events. RCT results were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs (N = 2,594) were included. At 72 h, HAT reduced SOFA scores from baseline (mean difference [MD] -1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.58 to -0.74, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT also reduced the duration of vasopressor use (MD -18.80 h, 95% CI: -23.67 to -13.93, I2 = 64%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT increased hospital LOS (MD 2.05 days, 95% CI: 0.15-3.95, I2 = 57%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on very low quality of evidence. HAT did not increase incidence of adverse events compared to placebo/SoC.

CONCLUSIONS

HAT appears beneficial in reducing vasopressor use and improving organ function in sepsis/septic shock patients. However, its advantages over hydrocortisone alone remain unclear. Future research should use hydrocortisone comparators and distinguish between sepsis-specific and comorbidity- or care-withdrawal-related mortality.

摘要

简介

本系统评价旨在评估氢化可的松、抗坏血酸和硫胺素(HAT)联合治疗在脓毒症和感染性休克患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和中国知网(CNKI)中进行了数据库检索,以查找比较 HAT 与安慰剂/标准治疗或与氢化可的松治疗脓毒症/感染性休克患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局包括死亡率、重症监护病房/医院住院时间(LOS)、血管加压素持续时间、机械通气持续时间、72 小时 SOFA 变化以及不良事件。RCT 结果采用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。

结果

纳入了 15 项 RCT(N=2594)。在 72 小时时,与安慰剂/SoC 相比,HAT 降低了 SOFA 评分(平均差值[MD]-1.16,95%置信区间[CI]-1.58 至-0.74,I2=0%),基于中等质量证据。与安慰剂/SoC 相比,HAT 还降低了血管加压素使用时间(MD-18.80 小时,95%CI-23.67 至-13.93,I2=64%),基于中等质量证据。与安慰剂/SoC 相比,HAT 增加了医院 LOS(MD 2.05 天,95%CI 0.15-3.95,I2=57%),基于极低质量证据。与安慰剂/SoC 相比,HAT 并未增加不良事件的发生率。

结论

HAT 似乎有利于减少脓毒症/感染性休克患者的血管加压素使用并改善器官功能。然而,与单独使用氢化可的松相比,其优势尚不清楚。未来的研究应使用氢化可的松对照剂,并区分脓毒症特异性和合并症或撤机相关死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4058/11446305/e96cce3d8e6a/iaa-2024-0185-0010-538959_F01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验