Suppr超能文献

比较腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后恶心呕吐的麻醉策略:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of anaesthesia strategies on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1200 Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China.

Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02577-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative anaesthesia management should be optimised to reduce the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients; however, a single intervention may not effectively reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in such patients. This study assessed the effect of an optimised anaesthetic protocol versus a conventional one on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

A single-centre randomised trial was conducted at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from June 2021 to December 2022. Among 168 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 116 qualified, and 103 completed the study with available data. Patients were categorized into the conventional group (received sevoflurane and standard fluids) and the optimised group (underwent propofol-based anaesthesia and was administered goal-directed fluids). The primary endpoints were postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence and severity within 24 h.

RESULTS

Postoperative nausea and vomiting assessment at 0-3 h post-surgery revealed no significant differences between groups. However, at 3-24 h, the optimised anaesthetic protocol group showed lower postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence and severity than those of the conventional group (P = 0.005). In the conventional group, 20 (37.04%) patients experienced moderate-to-severe postoperative nausea and vomiting, compared to six (12.25%) patients in the optimised group (odds ratio = 0.237; 95% CI = 0.086, 0.656; P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in antiemetic treatment, moderate-to-severe pain incidence, anaesthesia recovery, post-anaesthetic care unit stay, or postoperative duration between the groups. While the total intra-operative infusion volumes were comparable, the optimised group had a significantly higher colloidal infusion volume (500 mL vs. 0 mL, P = 0.014) than that of the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting 3-24 h postoperatively in patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were significantly lower with propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia and goal-directed fluid therapy than with sevoflurane anaesthesia and traditional fluid management. Total intravenous anaesthesia is an effective multimodal antiemetic strategy for bariatric surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC- 2,100,046,534, registration date: 21 May 2021).

摘要

背景

术中麻醉管理应优化以降低高危患者术后恶心和呕吐的发生;然而,单一干预措施可能无法有效降低此类患者的术后恶心和呕吐。本研究评估了优化麻醉方案与常规麻醉方案对接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者术后恶心和呕吐的影响。

方法

本研究为 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月在北京大学深圳医院进行的单中心随机试验。在 168 例接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的患者中,116 例合格,103 例完成了研究并提供了可用数据。患者分为常规组(接受七氟醚和标准液体)和优化组(接受依托咪酯基础麻醉并给予目标导向液体)。主要终点是术后 24 小时内恶心和呕吐的发生率和严重程度。

结果

术后 0-3 小时恶心和呕吐评估显示两组间无显著差异。然而,在 3-24 小时时,优化麻醉方案组的术后恶心和呕吐发生率和严重程度低于常规组(P=0.005)。在常规组中,20 例(37.04%)患者出现中重度术后恶心和呕吐,而优化组中仅 6 例(12.25%)患者出现(比值比=0.237;95%CI=0.086,0.656;P=0.006)。两组间在止吐治疗、中重度疼痛发生率、麻醉恢复、麻醉后监护病房停留时间或术后时间方面无显著差异。虽然总术中输液量相似,但优化组胶体输液量明显更高(500ml 比 0ml,P=0.014)。

结论

与七氟醚麻醉和传统液体管理相比,接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的患者术后 3-24 小时恶心和呕吐的发生率和严重程度显著降低,采用依托咪酯全静脉麻醉和目标导向液体治疗。全静脉麻醉是肥胖手术的一种有效的多模式止吐策略。

试验注册

本试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR-TRC-2100046534,注册日期:2021 年 5 月 21 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d7/11170773/ed0e2f284304/12871_2024_2577_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验