• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强基于工作场所评估的需求评估:一项扎根理论研究。

A needs assessment for enhancing workplace-based assessment: a grounded theory study.

机构信息

Academic Centre for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05636-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05636-3
PMID:38872142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177355/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Workplace-based assessment (WBA) has been vigorously criticized for not fulfilling its educational purpose by medical educators. A comprehensive exploration of stakeholders' needs regarding WBA is essential to optimize its implementation in clinical practice.

METHOD

Three homogeneous focus groups were conducted with three groups of stakeholders: General Practitioner (GP) trainees, GP trainers, and GP tutors. Due to COVID-19 measures, we opted for an online asynchronous form to enable participation. An constructivist grounded theory approach was used to employ this study and allow the identification of stakeholders' needs for using WBA.

RESULTS

Three core needs for WBA were identified in the analysis. Within GP Training, stakeholders found WBA essential, primarily, for establishing learning goals, secondarily, for assessment purposes, and, lastly, for providing or receiving feedback.

CONCLUSION

All stakeholders perceive WBA as valuable when it fosters learning. The identified needs were notably influenced by agency, trust, availability, and mutual understanding. These were facilitating factors influencing needs for WBA. Embracing these insights can significantly illuminate the landscape of workplace learning culture for clinical educators and guide a successful implementation of WBA.

摘要

目的

工作场所评估(WBA)一直受到医学教育者的强烈批评,因为它没有达到其教育目的。全面了解利益相关者对 WBA 的需求对于优化其在临床实践中的实施至关重要。

方法

我们对三组利益相关者进行了三次同质的焦点小组讨论:普通科医生(GP)培训生、GP 培训师和 GP 导师。由于 COVID-19 措施,我们选择了在线异步形式以允许参与。采用建构主义扎根理论方法进行本研究,以确定利益相关者对使用 WBA 的需求。

结果

在分析中确定了 WBA 的三个核心需求。在 GP 培训中,利益相关者发现 WBA 对于设定学习目标至关重要,其次是评估目的,最后是提供或接收反馈。

结论

当 WBA 促进学习时,所有利益相关者都认为它很有价值。所确定的需求主要受到机构、信任、可用性和相互理解的影响。这些是影响 WBA 需求的促进因素。了解这些见解可以显著阐明临床教育者的工作场所学习文化,并指导 WBA 的成功实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebcd/11177355/2a997dada4d3/12909_2024_5636_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebcd/11177355/2a997dada4d3/12909_2024_5636_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebcd/11177355/2a997dada4d3/12909_2024_5636_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A needs assessment for enhancing workplace-based assessment: a grounded theory study.增强基于工作场所评估的需求评估:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05636-3.
2
Educational Impact Drives Feasibility of Implementing Daily Assessment in the Workplace.教育影响推动了在工作场所实施日常评估的可行性。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):389-398. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1729162. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
'Playing the game': How do surgical trainees seek feedback using workplace-based assessment?“参与游戏”:外科实习医生如何利用基于工作场所的评估来寻求反馈?
Med Educ. 2017 Sep;51(9):953-962. doi: 10.1111/medu.13380.
4
Myths and legends in workplace-based assessment; it's all about perspective?工作场所评估中的神话和传说;这都是视角问题吗?
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Mar;31(2):74-80. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1712664. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on workplace-based performance assessment: towards a better understanding of assessor behaviour.利益相关者对基于工作场所的绩效评估的看法:旨在更好地理解评估者的行为。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1213-1243. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9760-7. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study.教师如何体验基于工作场所的评估评分员培训:一项定性研究。
Med Educ. 2015 Jul;49(7):692-708. doi: 10.1111/medu.12733.
7
Beyond Checking Boxes: Exploring Tensions With Use of a Workplace-Based Assessment Tool for Formative Assessment in Clerkships.超越勾选:探索在实习中使用基于工作场所的评估工具进行形成性评估时的紧张关系。
Acad Med. 2022 Oct 1;97(10):1511-1520. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004774. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Implementation and Use of Workplace-Based Assessment in Clinical Learning Environments: A Scoping Review.临床学习环境中基于工作场所评估的实施和使用:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11S):S164-S174. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004366.
9
Implementation and Impact of an Adapted Digital Perioperative Competency-Building Tool to Enhance Teaching, Learning And Feedback in Postgraduate Competency-Based Medical Education.适应数字化围手术期能力建设工具的实施和影响,以加强研究生以能力为基础的医学教育中的教学、学习和反馈。
J Surg Educ. 2024 May;81(5):722-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
10
Fostering teaching-learning through workplace based assessment in postgraduate chemical pathology residency program using virtual learning environment.在研究生临床化学病理学住院医师培训项目中,利用虚拟学习环境通过基于工作场所的评估促进教学相长。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02299-8.

引用本文的文献

1
China's national continuing medical education program for general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey (2016-2023).中国全科医生国家继续医学教育项目:一项横断面调查(2016 - 2023年)
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06682-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing faculty development: lessons learnt from a qualitative interpretivist study exploring students' expectations and experiences of clinical teaching.设计教师发展:从一项定性解释主义研究中汲取的经验教训,该研究探讨了学生对临床教学的期望和体验。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1480-7.
2
2018 Consensus framework for good assessment.2018 年良好评估共识框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Implementing competency-based medical education: What changes in curricular structure and processes are needed?
实施以能力为基础的医学教育:课程结构和流程需要哪些改变?
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):594-598. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315077.
4
Trust and risk: a model for medical education.信任与风险:医学教育模式
Med Educ. 2017 Sep;51(9):892-902. doi: 10.1111/medu.13339. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Is the learning value of workplace-based assessment being realised? A qualitative study of trainer and trainee perceptions and experiences.基于工作场所的评估的学习价值是否正在得到实现?一项关于培训师和学员看法与经历的定性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Mar;93(1097):138-142. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133917. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
Video training with peer feedback in real-time consultation: acceptability and feasibility in a general-practice setting.实时会诊中伴有同伴反馈的视频培训:在全科医疗环境中的可接受性和可行性。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Aug;92(1090):431-5. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133633. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
7
Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings.基于工作场所的评估:对用户认知及解决已发现不足的策略的综述
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 May;21(2):455-73. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0. Epub 2015 May 24.
8
Advantages of asynchronous online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups as perceived by child, adolescent and adult participants: a survey study.儿童、青少年和成人参与者所感知的异步在线焦点小组和面对面焦点小组的优势:一项调查研究
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Oct 24;7:756. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-756.
9
The use of triangulation in qualitative research.三角互证法在定性研究中的应用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
10
Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91.医学教育研究中焦点小组的运用:医学教育促进与研究协会指南第91号
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165. Epub 2014 Jul 29.