Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jul;52(9):2295-2305. doi: 10.1177/03635465241255950. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Despite focus on surgical preservation of the chondrolabral junction (CLJ), the transition zone between the acetabular cartilage and labrum, the association between severity of CLJ breakdown and functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy remains unexplored.
To assess the influence of CLJ breakdown on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a 24-month follow-up after hip arthroscopy for symptomatic labral tears.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify patients ≥18 years of age with a minimum 24-month follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. The Beck classification of transition zone cartilage was used to grade CLJ damage; patients with grades 0 to 2 were stratified into the mild CLJ damage cohort, and those with grades 3 and 4 were stratified into the severe CLJ damage cohort. PROMs were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter postoperatively. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare PROMs. Rates of achieving clinically meaningful thresholds and subsequent surgery rates were also compared.
In total, 198 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 3.54 ± 1.26 years. A total of 95 patients with severe CLJ damage (mean age, 34.9 ± 10.5 years) were compared with 103 patients with mild CLJ damage (mean age, 38.2 ± 11.9 years). Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog score for pain were inferior in the severe CLJ group at enrollment and all follow-up time points (≤ .05). However, patients with severe CLJ breakdown exhibited greater improvements in HOS-ADL and NAHS at the 24-month follow-up and achieved clinically meaningful thresholds at equivalent rates to patients with mild CLJ breakdown. Subsequent surgery rates were 6.8% and 12.6% in patients with mild versus severe CLJ damage, respectively ( = .250).
Severe CLJ breakdown is associated with increased pain and decreased functional level preoperatively and up to 24 months after hip arthroscopy. Despite this, patients with severe CLJ breakdown experienced greater improvements in functional outcomes at a 24-month follow-up and achieved clinical thresholds at similar rates to patients with mild CLJ damage. Thus, while worse baseline pain and functional levels may indicate severe CLJ breakdown, these patients still benefit substantially from hip arthroscopy.
尽管人们关注的焦点是手术保留髋关节盂唇关节(CLJ),即髋臼软骨和盂唇之间的过渡区,但 CLJ 破裂的严重程度与髋关节镜检查后的功能结果之间的关系仍未得到探索。
评估髋关节镜检查治疗髋关节撞击综合征相关的髋臼唇撕裂后 24 个月时 CLJ 破裂对患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)的影响。
队列研究;证据水平,3 级。
对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析,以确定由同一位外科医生进行髋关节镜检查的至少有 24 个月随访的年龄≥18 岁的患者,这些患者因髋关节撞击综合征而接受髋关节镜检查治疗有症状的髋臼唇撕裂。采用 Beck 分级法对过渡区软骨进行 CLJ 损伤分级;将 CLJ 损伤分级为 0 至 2 级的患者分为轻度 CLJ 损伤组,将 CLJ 损伤分级为 3 级和 4 级的患者分为重度 CLJ 损伤组。在基线和术后 3、6、12 个月以及此后每年收集 PROMs。采用线性混合效应模型比较 PROMs。还比较了达到临床有意义阈值的比例和随后手术的比例。
共纳入 198 例符合条件的患者,平均随访 3.54±1.26 年。将 95 例重度 CLJ 损伤患者(平均年龄 34.9±10.5 岁)与 103 例轻度 CLJ 损伤患者(平均年龄 38.2±11.9 岁)进行比较。在登记和所有随访时间点(≤.05),重度 CLJ 组的髋关节功能评分-日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)和疼痛视觉模拟评分均较低。然而,重度 CLJ 破裂组在 24 个月随访时 HOS-ADL 和 NAHS 改善更明显,达到临床有意义阈值的比例与轻度 CLJ 破裂组相当。轻度和重度 CLJ 损伤患者的后续手术率分别为 6.8%和 12.6%( =.250)。
重度 CLJ 破裂与髋关节镜检查前和术后 24 个月的疼痛增加和功能水平降低有关。尽管如此,重度 CLJ 破裂患者在 24 个月随访时的功能结局改善更明显,达到临床阈值的比例与轻度 CLJ 损伤患者相当。因此,尽管基线疼痛和功能水平较差可能提示重度 CLJ 破裂,但这些患者仍能从髋关节镜检查中获益。