Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Gyomoon-dong, Guri-si, Gyunggido, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0240993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240993. eCollection 2020.
Acetabular labral tears cause of pain in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia. To date, no structured grading system has been developed to evaluate labral tears in these patients. The present study describes a new system of grading labral tears in patients with acetabular dysplasia.
The data of 66 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for symptomatic hip dysplasia from March 2014 to February 2018 were reviewed. Labral tears were classified into four groups, based on the occurrence of chondrolabral junction (CLJ) disruption, capsulolabral recess (CLR) disruption, and labral displacement. Labral tears without instability were classified as grade 1 or 2. Partial delamination or blistering of the labrum with minimal fraying at the CLJ was classified as grade 1, whereas labral tears with CLJ disruption were classified as grade 2. Unstable labral tears with CLR disruption followed by CLJ disruption, but without labral displacement, were classified as grade 3, whereas unstable labral tears with CLR and CLJ disruption, but with labral displacement, were classified as grade 4. The radiological and clinical characteristics of patients in each grade were determined including by simple radiographs and MRI/MR arthrography, as were concomitant findings, including rupture of the ligamentum teres, articular cartilage damage, and presence of a paralabral cyst. The surgical options selected for each grade and clinical outcomes, including modified Harris hip scores (mHHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, were evaluated. Spearman's correlation analyses were performed to assess whether labral tear grade correlated with baseline characteristics, the incidence of concomitant injuries, and the severity of osteoarthritis (OA). The Wilcoxon test for paired data was performed to compare treatment results with pain scores.
The study cohort included six men and 53 women of mean ± SD age 39.9 ± 13.0 years (range, 15-66 years). Of the 66 hips, seven (10.6%), 10 (15.2%), 30 (45.5%), and 19 (28.8%) were classified as grades 1-4, respectively. Symptom duration (P = 0.017), preoperative Tönnis OA grade (P < 0.001), cartilage damage (P < 0.001), and the presence of a paralabral cyst (P = 0.001) correlated significantly with baseline tear grade. In all groups, mHHS and WOMAC scores improved after surgical treatment.
Arthroscopic findings of labral tears in patients with hip dysplasia differed from the conventional classification. The classification system proposed in this study will likely be useful for determining the degree of labral tear in patients with hip dysplasia and for predicting treatment outcomes.
髋臼唇撕裂是导致髋关节发育不良患者疼痛的原因。迄今为止,尚无针对此类患者的髋臼唇撕裂的结构化分级系统。本研究描述了一种评估髋臼发育不良患者髋臼唇撕裂的新系统。
回顾了 2014 年 3 月至 2018 年 2 月期间因髋关节发育不良接受髋关节镜检查的 66 例患者的数据。根据软骨盂唇交界处 (CLJ) 中断、关节囊盂唇隐窝 (CLR) 中断和盂唇移位情况,将髋臼唇撕裂分为四组。无不稳定的髋臼唇撕裂分为 1 级或 2 级。CLJ 处仅有轻微分层或水疱形成,且撕裂处仅有轻微磨损的髋臼唇撕裂被分类为 1 级,而 CLJ 处有髋臼唇撕裂的则分类为 2 级。伴有 CLR 中断和 CLJ 中断但无盂唇移位的不稳定髋臼唇撕裂被分类为 3 级,而伴有 CLR 和 CLJ 中断且伴有盂唇移位的不稳定髋臼唇撕裂则分类为 4 级。通过简单的 X 线片和 MRI/MR 关节造影术确定每个等级患者的放射学和临床特征,包括合并症,包括圆韧带撕裂、关节软骨损伤和存在副唇囊肿。评估每个等级选择的手术方案以及临床结果,包括改良 Harris 髋关节评分(mHHS)和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分。采用 Spearman 相关分析评估髋臼唇撕裂分级与基线特征、合并症发生率和骨关节炎(OA)严重程度的相关性。采用配对 Wilcoxon 检验比较治疗前后疼痛评分。
研究队列包括 6 名男性和 53 名女性,平均年龄为 39.9 ± 13.0 岁(范围 15-66 岁)。在 66 个髋关节中,分别有 7 个(10.6%)、10 个(15.2%)、30 个(45.5%)和 19 个(28.8%)被分类为 1-4 级。症状持续时间(P = 0.017)、术前 Tönnis OA 分级(P < 0.001)、软骨损伤(P < 0.001)和副唇囊肿的存在(P = 0.001)与基线撕裂分级显著相关。在所有组中,mHHS 和 WOMAC 评分在手术后均得到改善。
髋关节发育不良患者的髋臼唇撕裂的关节镜表现与传统分类不同。本研究提出的分类系统可能有助于确定髋关节发育不良患者髋臼唇撕裂的程度,并预测治疗结果。