García-Castillo María, Hernández-García Marta, Correa Adriana, Coppi Marco, Griener Thomas, Fritsche Thomas, Pitart Cristina, Sampaio Jorge, Seifert Harald, Wake Karen, Wootton Mandy, Vila Jordi, Cantón Rafael
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Jun 13;6(3):dlae088. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae088. eCollection 2024 Jun.
We performed a multicentre study (2020-2022) to compare the activity of ozenoxacin and comparator agents against and clinical isolates from skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI).
A total of 1725 isolates (1454 and 271 ) were collected in 10 centres from eight countries between January 2020 and December 2022. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined (microdilution-SENSITITRE). Results were interpreted following European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2023 (clinical breakpoints, ECOFF) and CLSI criteria.
Ozenoxacin exhibited high activity against (MIC = 0.002/0.12 mg/L) and (MIC = 0.015/0.03 mg/L), inhibiting 99% of the isolates at MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L and at MIC ≤ 0.06, respectively. The most active comparators against were retapamulin (MIC = 0.12 mg/L), fusidic acid (MIC = 0.25 mg/L) and mupirocin (MIC = 0.5 mg/L); and against were retapamulin (MIC = 0.03 mg/L), clindamycin (MIC = 0.12 mg/L) and mupirocin (MIC = 0.25 mg/L). Ciprofloxacin and methicillin resistant rates for were 31.3% (455/1454) and 41% (598/1454), respectively. Additionally, 62% (373/598) of the MRSA were also ciprofloxacin non-susceptible, whereas only 10% (23/271) of the MSSA were ciprofloxacin resistant. Ozenoxacin was more active against ciprofloxacin-susceptible than against ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates, and showed a slightly higher MIC in MRSA isolates than in MSSA. However, ozenoxacin activity was comparable in both ciprofloxacin-resistant MSSA and MRSA subsets. On the other hand, ozenoxacin had similar activity in ciprofloxacin-susceptible and resistant isolates.
Ozenoxacin is a potent antimicrobial agent of topic use against Gram-positive bacteria causing SSTI, including MRSA isolates non-susceptible to ciprofloxacin.
我们开展了一项多中心研究(2020 - 2022年),以比较奥扎沙星与对照药物对皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌和酿脓链球菌的活性。
2020年1月至2022年12月期间,在来自八个国家的10个中心共收集了1725株分离菌(1454株金黄色葡萄球菌和271株酿脓链球菌)。采用微量稀释法(SENSITITRE)进行抗菌药敏试验。结果依据欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)2023年标准(临床断点值、ECOFF)和美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)标准进行解读。
奥扎沙星对金黄色葡萄球菌(MIC = 0.002/0.12 mg/L)和酿脓链球菌(MIC = 0.015/0.03 mg/L)表现出高活性,在MIC≤0.5 mg/L时分别抑制了99%的分离菌,在MIC≤0.06时也抑制了99%的分离菌。对金黄色葡萄球菌活性最高的对照药物是瑞他帕林(MIC = 0.12 mg/L)、夫西地酸(MIC = 0.25 mg/L)和莫匹罗星(MIC = 0.5 mg/L);对酿脓链球菌活性最高的对照药物是瑞他帕林(MIC = 0.03 mg/L)、克林霉素(MIC = 0.12 mg/L)和莫匹罗星(MIC = 0.25 mg/L)。金黄色葡萄球菌对环丙沙星和甲氧西林的耐药率分别为31.3%(455/1454)和41%(598/1454)。此外,62%(373/598)的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对环丙沙星也不敏感,而只有10%(23/271)敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)对环丙沙星耐药。奥扎沙星对环丙沙星敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌的活性比对环丙沙星耐药的分离菌更高,并且在MRSA分离菌中的MIC略高于MSSA。然而,奥扎沙星在环丙沙星耐药的MSSA和MRSA亚组中的活性相当。另一方面,奥扎沙星在环丙沙星敏感和耐药的酿脓链球菌分离菌中的活性相似。
奥扎沙星是一种用于治疗由革兰氏阳性菌引起的SSTI的有效外用抗菌药物,包括对环丙沙星不敏感的MRSA分离菌。