Wu Feixiang, Cui Chenmin, Wu Junping, Wang Yunqing
Department of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hangzhou Linping District Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311199, P.R. China.
Department of Internal Medicine, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2024 May 31;28(2):308. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12597. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolism disorders are increasingly recognized as key contributors to the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, a novel marker of lipid accumulation, has potential implications for CKD risk assessment. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between LAP index and CKD, with an emphasis on varying impacts in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. A comprehensive search for relevant publications was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases, and a meta-analysis of 17 studies was performed to investigate the relationship between LAP index and CKD. The random-effects inverse-variance model employing the DerSimonian-Laird estimator for τ² was utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with calculations of the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic OR. The pooled OR for the association between higher quintiles or tertiles of LAP index and CKD was 1.098 (95% CI: 1.043-1.152), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=91.2%) and evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association in non-diabetic (OR=2.422, 95% CI: 1.802-3.042) compared with diabetic patients (OR=1.018, 95% CI: 0.993-1.043). The diagnostic accuracy of LAP index for CKD was moderate (AUROC=0.64), with sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. In conclusion, in the present study, LAP index demonstrated a modest but significant association with CKD, particularly in non-diabetic patients. Despite its moderate diagnostic accuracy, the LAP index could serve as a valuable tool in CKD risk stratification, particularly when integrated with other clinical markers.
糖尿病和脂质代谢紊乱日益被认为是慢性肾脏病(CKD)发展的关键因素。脂质蓄积产物(LAP)指数作为脂质蓄积的一种新型标志物,对CKD风险评估具有潜在意义。本荟萃分析旨在评估LAP指数与CKD之间的关联,重点关注糖尿病和非糖尿病人群中的不同影响。通过PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、ScienceDirect和谷歌学术数据库对相关出版物进行了全面检索,并对17项研究进行荟萃分析以探讨LAP指数与CKD之间的关系。采用DerSimonian-Laird估计器计算τ²的随机效应逆方差模型来计算合并比值比(OR)。使用汇总受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断准确性,并计算ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性、特异性、似然比和诊断OR。LAP指数较高五分位数或三分位数与CKD关联的合并OR为1.098(95%CI:1.043 - 1.152),存在显著异质性(I² = 91.2%)且有发表偏倚的证据。亚组分析显示,与糖尿病患者(OR = 1.018,95%CI:0.993 - 1.043)相比,非糖尿病患者中的关联更强(OR = 2.422,95%CI:1.802 - 3.042)。LAP指数对CKD的诊断准确性中等(AUROC = 0.64),敏感性和特异性估计分别为0.58和0.63。总之,在本研究中,LAP指数与CKD存在适度但显著的关联,尤其是在非糖尿病患者中。尽管其诊断准确性中等,但LAP指数可作为CKD风险分层的有价值工具,特别是与其他临床标志物结合使用时。