Holland Alexis M, Mead Brittany S, Lorenz William R, Scarola Gregory T, Augenstein Vedra A
Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, United States.
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 May 30;3:12946. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.12946. eCollection 2024.
Health disparities are pervasive in surgical care. Particularly racial and socioeconomic inequalities have been demonstrated in emergency general surgery outcomes, but less so in elective abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). The goal of this study was to evaluate the disparities in referrals to a tertiary hernia center. A prospectively maintained hernia database was queried for patients who underwent open ventral hernia (OVHR) or minimally invasive surgical (MISR) repair from 2011 to 2022 with complete insurance and address information. Patients were divided by home address into in-state (IS) and out-of-state (OOS) referrals as well as by operative technique. Demographic data and outcomes were compared. Standard and inferential statistical analyses were performed. Of 554 patients, most were IS (59.0%); 334 underwent OVHR, and 220 underwent MISR. IS patients were more likely to undergo MISR (OVHR: 45.6% vs. 81.5%, laparoscopic: 38.2% vs. 14.1%, robotic: 16.2% vs. 4.4%; < 0.001) when compared to OOS referrals. Of OVHR patients, 44.6% were IS and 55.4% were OOS. Patients' average age and BMI, sex, ASA score, and insurance payer were similar between IS and OOS groups. IS patients were more often Black (White: 77.9% vs. 93.5%, Black: 16.8% vs. 4.3%; < 0.001). IS patients had more smokers (12.1% vs. 3.2%; = 0.001), fewer recurrent hernias (45.0% vs. 69.7%; < 0.001), and smaller defects (155.7 ± 142.2 vs. 256.4 ± 202.9 cm; < 0.001). Wound class, mesh type, and rate of fascial closure were similar, but IS patients underwent fewer panniculectomies (13.4% vs. 34.1%; < 0.001), component separations (26.2% vs. 51.4%; < 0.001), received smaller mesh (744.2 ± 495.6 vs. 975.7 ± 442.3 cm; < 0.001), and had shorter length-of-stay (4.8 ± 2.0 vs. 7.0 ± 5.5 days; < 0.001). There was no difference in wound breakdown, seroma requiring intervention, hematoma, mesh infection, or recurrence; however, IS patients had decreased wound infections (2.0% vs. 8.6%; = 0.009), overall wound complications (11.4% vs. 21.1%; = 0.016), readmissions (2.7% vs. 13.0%; = 0.001), and reoperations (3.4% vs. 11.4%; = 0.007). Of MISR patients, 80.9% were IS and 19.1% were OOS. In contrast to OVHR, MISR IS and OOS patients had similar demographics, preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Although there were no differences in referred patients for MISR, this study demonstrates the racial disparities that exist among our IS and OOS complex, open AWR patients. Awareness of these disparities can help clinicians work towards equitable access to care and equal referrals to tertiary hernia centers.
健康差异在外科护理中普遍存在。尤其是在急诊普通外科手术结果中已显示出种族和社会经济不平等,但在择期腹壁重建(AWR)中则较少。本研究的目的是评估三级疝气中心转诊中的差异。对一个前瞻性维护的疝气数据库进行查询,以获取2011年至2022年期间接受开放性腹疝(OVHR)或微创手术(MISR)修复且有完整保险和地址信息的患者。患者按家庭住址分为州内(IS)和州外(OOS)转诊患者,以及按手术技术进行划分。比较人口统计学数据和结果。进行了标准和推断性统计分析。在554例患者中,大多数是州内患者(59.0%);334例接受了OVHR,220例接受了MISR。与州外转诊患者相比,州内患者更有可能接受MISR(OVHR:45.6%对81.5%,腹腔镜手术:38.2%对14.1%,机器人手术:16.2%对4.4%;<0.001)。在接受OVHR的患者中,44.6%是州内患者,55.4%是州外患者。州内和州外患者组之间患者的平均年龄、体重指数、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和保险支付方相似。州内患者中黑人比例更高(白人:77.9%对93.5%,黑人:16.8%对4.3%;<0.001)。州内患者吸烟者更多(12.1%对3.2%;=0.001),复发性疝气更少(45.0%对69.7%;<0.001),缺损更小(155.7±142.2对256.4±202.9平方厘米;<0.001)。伤口分类、补片类型和筋膜闭合率相似,但州内患者进行的腹部整形术更少(13.4%对34.1%;<0.001),组织分离更少(26.2%对51.4%;<0.001),接受的补片更小(744.2±495.6对975.7±442.3平方厘米;<0.001),住院时间更短(4.8±2.0对7.0±5.5天;<0.001)。伤口裂开、需要干预的血清肿、血肿、补片感染或复发方面没有差异;然而,州内患者的伤口感染减少(2.0%对8.6%;=0.009),总体伤口并发症减少(11.4%对21.1%;=0.016),再入院率降低(2.7%对13.0%;=0.001),再次手术率降低(3.4%对11.4%;=0.007)。在接受MISR的患者中,80.9%是州内患者,19.1%是州外患者。与OVHR不同,接受MISR的州内和州外患者在人口统计学、术前特征、术中细节和术后结果方面相似。尽管接受MISR的转诊患者没有差异,但本研究表明我们州内和州外复杂开放性AWR患者之间存在种族差异。认识到这些差异有助于临床医生努力实现公平的医疗服务获取和平等转诊至三级疝气中心。