Ayivi-Vinz Gloria, Tremblay Martin, Gadio Souleymane, Dofara Suélène Georgina, Daniel Sam J, Talbot Denis, Légaré France
Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
J CME. 2024 Jun 12;13(1):2363550. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2363550. eCollection 2024.
COVID-19 accelerated continuing professional development (CPD) delivered online. We aimed to compare the impact of in-person versus online CPD courses on medical specialists' behavioural intentions and subsequent behaviour. In this comparative before-and-after study, medical specialists attended in-person courses on nine clinical topics. A second group attended an adapted online version of these courses. Behavioural intention and its psychosocial determinants were measured before and immediately after the courses. Behaviour change was measured six months later. Generalised estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare the impact of course formats. A total of 82/206 in-person registrants (mean age: 52±10 years; 50% men) and 318/506 on-line registrants (mean age: 49±12 years; men: 63%) participated. Mean intention before in-person courses was 5.99±1.31 and 6.43±0.80 afterwards (average intention gain 0.44, CI: 0.16-0.74; =0.003); mean intention before online courses was 5.53±1.62 and 5.98±1.40 afterwards (average intention gain of 0.45, CI: 0.30-0.58; <0.0001). Difference in intention gain between groups was not statistically significant. Behaviour reported six months later was not significantly associated with post-course intention in either group. However, the intention difference increased significantly among those who said they had adopted the targeted behaviour (paired wilcoxon test: = 40 and -value=0.002) while it did not increase significantly in the group of those who had not adopted a targeted behaviour (paired wilcoxon test: = 16 and -value=0.223). In conclusion, the increase in intention of specialists after CPD courses was similar whether the course was in-person or online. Also, an increase in intention in both groups signalled more likelihood of adoption.
新冠疫情加速了在线继续职业发展(CPD)。我们旨在比较面对面CPD课程与在线CPD课程对医学专家行为意图及后续行为的影响。在这项前后对比的比较研究中,医学专家参加了九个临床主题的面对面课程。另一组参加了这些课程的在线改编版。在课程开始前及结束后立即测量行为意图及其心理社会决定因素。六个月后测量行为变化。使用广义估计方程(GEE)模型比较课程形式的影响。共有82/206名面对面课程注册者(平均年龄:52±10岁;50%为男性)和318/506名在线课程注册者(平均年龄:49±12岁;男性:63%)参与。面对面课程前的平均意图为5.99±1.31,之后为6.43±0.80(平均意图增益0.44,CI:0.16 - 0.74;P = 0.003);在线课程前的平均意图为5.53±1.62,之后为5.98±1.40(平均意图增益0.45,CI:0.30 - 0.58;P < 0.0001)。两组之间意图增益的差异无统计学意义。六个月后报告的行为与两组课程后的意图均无显著关联。然而,在表示已采取目标行为的人群中,意图差异显著增加(配对威尔科克森检验:Z = 40,P值 = 0.002),而在未采取目标行为的人群中意图差异未显著增加(配对威尔科克森检验:Z = 16,P值 = 0.223)。总之,无论CPD课程是面对面还是在线形式,专家们在课程后的意图增加是相似的。此外,两组意图的增加都表明采取行动的可能性更大。