• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便捐献者筛查流程的经济与时间优化

Economic and Chronologic Optimization of Fecal Donors Screening Process.

作者信息

Levy Bar, Fliss Isakov Naomi, Ziv-Baran Tomer, Leshno Moshe, Maharshak Nitsan, Werner Lael

机构信息

School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Jun 13;9(1):23814683241254809. doi: 10.1177/23814683241254809. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/23814683241254809
PMID:38873648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11171430/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the delivery of fecal microbiome, isolated from healthy donors, into a patient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT is a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent infection. Donors undergo strict screening to avoid disease transmission. This consists of several blood and stool tests, which are performed in a multistage, costly process. We performed a cost-minimizing analysis to find the optimal order in which the tests should be performed. An algorithm to optimize the order of tests in terms of cost was defined. Performance analysis for disqualifying a potential healthy donor was carried out on data sets based on either the published literature or our real-life data. For both data sets, we calculated the total cost to qualify a single donor according to the optimal order of tests, suggested by the algorithm. Applying the algorithm to the published literature revealed potential savings of 94.2% of the cost of screening a potential donor and 7.05% of the cost to qualify a single donor. In our cohort of 87 volunteers, 53 were not eligible for donation. Of 34 potential donors, 10 were disqualified due to abnormal lab tests. Applying our algorithm to optimize the order of tests, the average cost for screening a potential donor resulted in potential savings of 49.9% and a 21.3% savings in the cost to qualify a single donor. Improving the order and timing of the screening tests of potential FMT stool donors can decrease the costs by about 50% per subject.

HIGHLIGHTS

What is known:Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of microbiome from healthy donors to patients.Fecal donors undergo multiple strict screening tests to exclude any transmissible disease.Screening tests of potential fecal donors is expensive and time consuming.FMT is the most efficient treatment for recurrent infection.What is new here:An algorithm to optimize the order of donors' screening tests in terms of cost was defined.Optimizing the order tests can save nearly 50% in costs of screening a potential donor.

摘要

未标注

粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是将从健康供体分离出的粪便微生物群输送到患者的胃肠道。FMT是治疗复发性感染的一种安全有效的方法。供体要接受严格筛查以避免疾病传播。这包括多项血液和粪便检测,检测过程分多阶段进行,成本高昂。我们进行了成本最小化分析,以找出检测应按的最优顺序。定义了一种根据成本优化检测顺序的算法。基于已发表文献或我们的实际数据,对数据集进行了潜在健康供体不合格的性能分析。对于这两个数据集,我们根据算法建议的最优检测顺序,计算了使单个供体合格的总成本。将该算法应用于已发表文献显示,筛选潜在供体的成本可节省94.2%,使单个供体合格的成本可节省7.05%。在我们的87名志愿者队列中,53人不符合捐赠条件。在34名潜在供体中,10人因实验室检测异常而被取消资格。应用我们的算法优化检测顺序,筛选潜在供体的平均成本可节省49.9%,使单个供体合格的成本可节省21.3%。改善潜在FMT粪便供体筛查检测的顺序和时间,可使每个受试者的成本降低约50%。

要点

已知内容:粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是将微生物群从健康供体转移到患者。粪便供体要接受多项严格筛查检测以排除任何可传播疾病。潜在粪便供体的筛查检测成本高昂且耗时。FMT是治疗复发性感染最有效的方法。新内容:定义了一种根据成本优化供体筛查检测顺序的算法。优化检测顺序可使筛选潜在供体的成本节省近50%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/11171430/94784c28d48a/10.1177_23814683241254809-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/11171430/62749c18c875/10.1177_23814683241254809-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/11171430/94784c28d48a/10.1177_23814683241254809-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/11171430/62749c18c875/10.1177_23814683241254809-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/11171430/94784c28d48a/10.1177_23814683241254809-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic and Chronologic Optimization of Fecal Donors Screening Process.粪便捐献者筛查流程的经济与时间优化
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Jun 13;9(1):23814683241254809. doi: 10.1177/23814683241254809. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
Microbiota restoration therapies for recurrent infection reach an important new milestone.用于复发性感染的微生物群恢复疗法达到了一个重要的新里程碑。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 May 24;17:17562848241253089. doi: 10.1177/17562848241253089. eCollection 2024.
3
In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.寻找粪便捐赠者:一项多中心研究,调查潜在捐赠者对粪便微生物群移植的预先知识、看法、动机和阻碍因素。
Gut Microbes. 2020;11(1):51-62. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Screening costs associated with donor selection for fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of PD-1 refractory melanoma patients.用于治疗 PD-1 难治性黑色素瘤患者的粪便微生物群移植供体选择的筛查费用。
Melanoma Res. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):136-148. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000871. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
5
Identification of donor Bacteroides vulgatus genes encoding proteins that correlate with early colonization following fecal transplant of patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile.鉴定与粪菌移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌患者早期定植相关的供体脆弱拟杆菌编码蛋白的基因。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 29;13(1):14112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41128-y.
6
Extended Screening Costs Associated With Selecting Donors for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Diseases.为治疗代谢综合征相关疾病选择粪便微生物群移植供体所产生的额外筛查成本。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 6;4(4):ofx243. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx243. eCollection 2017 Fall.
7
Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).粪便微生物移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌(艰难梭菌)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 25;4(4):CD013871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013871.pub2.
8
The role of the gut microbiome in colonization resistance and recurrent infection.肠道微生物群在定植抗性和反复感染中的作用。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 18;15:17562848221134396. doi: 10.1177/17562848221134396. eCollection 2022.
9
Colonization potential to reconstitute a microbe community in patients detected early after fecal microbe transplant for recurrent C. difficile.粪便微生物移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染后早期检测到的患者中重建微生物群落的定殖潜力。
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jan 13;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0622-2.
10
High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase organisms and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on donor recruitment for fecal microbiota transplantation in Hong Kong.香港产 ESBL 菌的高流行率和 COVID-19 大流行对粪便微生物移植供体招募的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Nov;9(9):1027-1038. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12160. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
How to prepare stool banks for an appropriate response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences in the Netherlands and a retrospective comparative cohort study for faecal microbiota transplantation.如何为应对持续的 COVID-19 大流行做好粪便库的准备:荷兰的经验以及粪菌移植的回顾性对照队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265426. eCollection 2022.
2
Donor program for fecal microbiota transplantation: A 3-year experience of a large-volume Italian stool bank.粪便微生物群移植供体计划:大容量意大利粪便库的 3 年经验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Nov;53(11):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 May 21.
3
Stool Banking for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Methods and Operations at a Large Stool Bank.
粪便银行用于粪便微生物群移植:大型粪便银行的方法和操作。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Apr 15;11:622949. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.622949. eCollection 2021.
4
A standardised model for stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation: a consensus report from a multidisciplinary UEG working group.粪便银行用于粪便微生物群移植的标准化模型:多学科 UEG 工作组的共识报告。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Mar;9(2):229-247. doi: 10.1177/2050640620967898. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence, recurrence, and antibody levels: Associations with cadmium and lead exposures in the general United States population.巨细胞病毒血清流行率、复发情况及抗体水平:与美国普通人群镉和铅暴露的关联
Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 5;4(4):e100. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000100. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Prevalence of Infection and Diagnostic Methods in the Middle East and North Africa Region.中东和北非地区的感染流行率和诊断方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 9;56(4):169. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040169.
7
Prevalence and Effect of Intestinal Infections Detected by a PCR-Based Stool Test in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.基于 PCR 的粪便检测在炎症性肠病患者中检测到的肠道感染的流行情况及影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3287-3296. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06071-2. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
A systematic review of economic evaluation in fecal microbiota transplantation.粪菌移植的经济学评价系统综述
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):458-466. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.371. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Where Stool is a Drug: International Approaches to Regulating the use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation.粪便也是药物:国际社会对调控粪便微生物移植应用的相关举措。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;47(4):524-540. doi: 10.1177/1073110519897729.
10
The association between C-reactive protein and common blood tests in apparently healthy individuals undergoing a routine health examination.C 反应蛋白与接受常规健康检查的貌似健康个体的常见血液检测之间的关联。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Feb;501:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 6.