Singh Leah J, Floyd Randy G, Reynolds Matthew R, Pike Nikita M, Huenergarde Morgan C
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Child Neuropsychol. 2025 Feb;31(2):197-228. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2357376. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
The Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment - II (NEPSY-II) is a widely used assessment battery in pediatric settings, but its internal structure has not been adequately examined. This study employed a rational, empirical approach to examine the construct validity of 23 NEPSY-II subtest scores from children ages 7-12 ( = 9.99, = 2.76) in the NEPSY-II norming sample ( = 600; 50% girls). Competing higher-order models based on prior research, hypothesized NEPSY-II domains, and conceptual subtest classifications were evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis and a sequential approach to model comparisons. The results supported the multidimensionality of NEPSY-II subtests and the organization of subtests by hypothesized neuropsychological domains. The best fitting model included a general factor and four first-order factors. Factor loadings from the general factor to first-order factors were very strong. However, general factor loadings for most subtests were less than .50 (range = .21-.69, = .44), and domain-specific effects for all subtests, independent of the general factor, were even lower (range = .00-.45, = .44). Interestingly, all subtests demonstrated strong subtest-specific effects, but it is not clear what construct(s) the subtest-specific effects represent. Findings support NEPSY-II authors' emphasis on subtest-level interpretations rather than composite-level interpretations and highlight that NEPSY-II subtest scores should be interpreted carefully and with caution.
《发育神经心理评估第二版》(NEPSY-II)是儿科环境中广泛使用的一套评估工具,但对其内部结构尚未进行充分研究。本研究采用合理的实证方法,对NEPSY-II常模样本(n = 600;50%为女孩)中7至12岁儿童(M = 9.99,SD = 2.76)的23个NEPSY-II子测验分数的结构效度进行了检验。基于先前研究、假设的NEPSY-II领域和概念性子测验分类,通过验证性因素分析和模型比较的顺序方法,对相互竞争的高阶模型进行了评估。结果支持了NEPSY-II子测验的多维性以及子测验按假设的神经心理领域进行的组织。最佳拟合模型包括一个一般因素和四个一阶因素。从一般因素到一阶因素的因素负荷非常强。然而,大多数子测验的一般因素负荷小于0.50(范围 = 0.21 - 0.69,M = 0.44),并且所有子测验独立于一般因素的特定领域效应甚至更低(范围 = 0.00 - 0.45,M = 0.44)。有趣的是,所有子测验都表现出很强的特定子测验效应,但尚不清楚这些特定子测验效应代表什么结构。研究结果支持NEPSY-II作者强调对子测验水平的解释而非综合水平的解释,并强调应谨慎且仔细地解释NEPSY-II子测验分数。