Rascon Allison N, Lander Bradley, Fiorellini Joseph P, Neiva Rodrigo
Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2025 Jun;15(2):124-129. doi: 10.1002/cap.10296. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Gingival recession can be considered an undesirable condition that results in the exposure of the root surface. There are many techniques that can be employed to address gingival recession; however, they frequently involve a second surgical site. Other approaches have been introduced in the past to address this concern, and this case study discusses the use of a modified technique to achieve root coverage.
A patient presented to the periodontics clinic with concerns regarding gingival recession. A modification to the semilunar technique was employed to address the recession, whereas double sling sutures were utilized to maintain the coronal repositioning of the flap.
Maxillary central incisors initially presented with 2-3 mm of facial recession and root coverage was achieved by use of a modified surgical semilunar approach. No rebound noted over a 6-month period, newly established gingival margin deemed clinically stable.
This case study provides an alternative to addressing gingival recession in the maxillary anterior region, when <3 mm of recession is noted. Avoidance of a second surgical procedure and/or donor site is of particular benefit, as well as maintenance of the blood supply.
Why is this case new information? There is insufficient evidence on the use of a modified wingspan incision design Phenotype modification with elimination of a second surgical site is most ideal for the patient. What are the keys to successful management of this case? Comprehensive diagnosis and proper case selection Meticulous flap management and adequate release to allow for repositioning without tension Appropriate use ofsuture and suturing technique. What are the primary limitations to success in this case? Thin periodontal phenotype Poor oral hygiene and plaque accumulation postoperatively Loss to follow-up.
牙龈退缩可被视为一种导致牙根表面暴露的不良状况。有许多技术可用于解决牙龈退缩问题;然而,它们通常涉及第二个手术部位。过去已经引入了其他方法来解决这一问题,本病例研究讨论了使用改良技术实现牙根覆盖。
一名患者因牙龈退缩问题前往牙周病诊所就诊。采用改良的半月形技术来解决退缩问题,同时使用双悬吊缝线来维持瓣的冠向复位。
上颌中切牙最初出现2 - 3毫米的面部退缩,通过使用改良的手术半月形方法实现了牙根覆盖。在6个月期间未观察到反弹,新建立的牙龈边缘在临床上被认为是稳定的。
本病例研究为上颌前部区域出现<3毫米退缩时解决牙龈退缩问题提供了一种替代方法。避免第二个手术程序和/或供区具有特别的益处,同时也有助于维持血供。
为什么这个病例是新信息?关于使用改良翼展切口设计的证据不足。消除第二个手术部位的表型改良对患者来说最为理想。成功处理这个病例的关键是什么?全面诊断和正确的病例选择;精心的瓣管理和充分的松解以允许无张力复位;适当使用缝线和缝合技术。这个病例成功的主要限制因素是什么?牙周表型薄;术后口腔卫生差和菌斑堆积;失访。