School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jul;20(7):4879-4890. doi: 10.1002/alz.14055. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Poor social connection is considered a risk factor for dementia. Since socializing behaviors may cluster together or act compensatorily, we aimed to investigate social connection patterns and their association with dementia, for men and women separately.
A total of 12,896 community-dwelling older adults (mean ± SD age: 75.2 ± 4.3 years, 54% women) without major cognitive impairment were included. Latent class analysis was conducted using 24 baseline social connection indicators. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association between latent classes and incident dementia over 12 (median: 8.4) years follow-up.
Three distinct classes were identified in both genders: strong social connections with an intermediate friend-relative network (Class 1: men, 43.8%; women, 37.9%), weak social connections (Class 2: men, 29.6%; women, 27.4%), and strong social connections with a larger friend-relative network (Class 3: men, 26.6%; women, 34.7%). Compared to Class 1, men in Class 2 (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.77) and women in Class 3 (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.60) had an increased risk of dementia.
Dementia risk varies with different social connection patterns among older men and women.
Three distinct social connection patterns were identified based on 24 indicators. These patterns were related to dementia risk differently in men and women. In men, a weak social connection pattern was associated with a higher dementia risk. In women, a strong social connection with a relatively larger friend-relative network was associated with a greater dementia risk.
较差的社会联系被认为是痴呆症的一个风险因素。由于社交行为可能聚集在一起或起到补偿作用,我们旨在分别研究男性和女性的社会联系模式及其与痴呆症的关系。
共纳入 12896 名无明显认知障碍的社区居住老年人(平均年龄±标准差:75.2±4.3 岁,54%为女性)。使用 24 项基线社会联系指标进行潜在类别分析。使用 Cox 比例风险回归估计潜在类别与 12 年(中位数:8.4 年)随访期间发生痴呆的相关性。
在两性中均确定了三个不同的类别:具有中等朋友-亲属网络的较强社会联系(类别 1:男性,43.8%;女性,37.9%)、较弱的社会联系(类别 2:男性,29.6%;女性,27.4%)和具有较大朋友-亲属网络的较强社会联系(类别 3:男性,26.6%;女性,34.7%)。与类别 1 相比,类别 2 的男性(HR:1.38,95%CI:1.08-1.77)和类别 3 的女性(HR:1.27,95%CI:1.01-1.60)患痴呆症的风险增加。
不同的老年男性和女性的社会联系模式与痴呆症风险有关。
基于 24 项指标确定了三种不同的社会联系模式。这些模式在男性和女性中的痴呆风险存在差异。在男性中,较弱的社会联系模式与较高的痴呆风险相关。在女性中,与相对较大的朋友-亲属网络的较强社会联系与更高的痴呆风险相关。