• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日间手术机器人肝切除术介绍:来自一家三级肝胆胰中心的病例系列。

Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.

Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4329-4335. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9
PMID:38874609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11289181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient's recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient's post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery.

METHODS

Single surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery.

RESULTS

This is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities.

CONCLUSION

This case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.

摘要

背景

无论采用哪种肝切除术式,肝外科都与显著的住院时间相关。开放性肝手术需要大切口,这是患者康复过程中的一个主要因素。对于需要手术切除的小肝实质病变患者,机器人手术可能为改变患者术后进程提供机会。当计划在入院 24 小时内出院的肝外科患者采用该方案时,我们机构制定并实施了日间机器人肝切除术路径。

方法

这是一家三级肝胆胰中心的单外科医生病例系列研究,纳入了 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 11 月期间进行的病例。纳入标准为非解剖性楔形切除术、<2 个解剖性节段切除术、左外侧肝切除术和微创手术。

结果

这是英国首例机器人日间小肝切除术系列研究。该病例系列纳入了 20 例患者。平均手术时间为 86.6±30.9 分钟,平均控制台时间为 58.6±24.5 分钟。13 例(65%)患者在术后 24 小时内出院。住院时间超过 24 小时的主要原因是疼痛缓解不足。无 Clavien-Dindo 分级 III 级或以上并发症、30 天再入院和 90 天死亡率。

结论

该病例系列表明机器人日间肝切除术是安全可行的。必须建立健全的随访途径,以确保安全实施这种方法,监测任何并发症,并在需要时及时进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7146/11289181/c2e379ebe3af/464_2024_10913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7146/11289181/887f8a128d9a/464_2024_10913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7146/11289181/c2e379ebe3af/464_2024_10913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7146/11289181/887f8a128d9a/464_2024_10913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7146/11289181/c2e379ebe3af/464_2024_10913_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre.日间手术机器人肝切除术介绍:来自一家三级肝胆胰中心的病例系列。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4329-4335. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
4
Clinical efficacy and learning curve analysis of 101 robotic-assisted Warshaw procedures: a retrospective study.101例机器人辅助Warshaw手术的临床疗效及学习曲线分析:一项回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11790-6.
5
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
6
Postoperative nutritional support after pancreaticoduodenectomy in adults.成人胰十二指肠切除术后的营养支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD014792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014792.pub2.
7
Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.肿瘤Ⅱ型骨盆切除术后采用同种异体骨移植加全髋关节置换术进行复合重建是可行的,但并发症多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003097. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 26;2014(12):CD005073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub4.
9
Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术对胰头或壶腹周围肿瘤术后住院时间和并发症的影响:一项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):428-437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00005-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹半肝切除术的比较:ORANGE II PLUS 多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 20;42(15):1799-1809. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01019. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Laparoscopic transverse abdominis plane block: how I do it and a cost efficiency analysis.腹腔镜腹横肌平面阻滞:我的操作方法和成本效益分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Dec 26;409(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03210-x.
3
10 years, 100 robotic major hepatectomies: a single-center experience.
10 年,100 例机器人辅助肝切除术:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):902-907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10459-2. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的常规当日出院手术评估。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2679-2684. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.增强康复路径对腹部手术后患者报告结局的影响:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8043-8056. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10289-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Same-day discharge robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience.当天出院机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:可行性、安全性和患者体验。
BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):92-99. doi: 10.1111/bju.16002. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Robotic major and minor hepatectomy: critical appraisal of learning curve and its impact on outcomes.机器人辅助肝大部切除术和肝小部切除术:学习曲线的批判性评估及其对手术结果的影响
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2915-2922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09809-3. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.机器人与开放式肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的安全性和疗效。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jan 1;158(1):46-54. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5697.
9
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术与开放性食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3177. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133177.
10
Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience.机器人肝脏切除术的短期疗效:单机构初步经验
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jan 27;14(1):224-233. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224.