School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Shandong, China.
School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(7):993-1001. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2359629. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
The visual guiding system, as a tunnel traffic safety improvement method by using visual guiding facilities to actively guide driving safely, has been widely used in countries with many tunnels, in recent years. This paper aims to quantitatively study the comprehensive evaluation of traffic safety of the visual guiding system in tunnels, which has certain engineering application value and can provide support for the quantitative evaluation and optimal design of tunnel traffic safety.
Based on the analysis of the relevant factors of urban tunnel traffic safety, a multi-factor comprehensive evaluation system with 5 upper-level indicators and 12 basic-level indicators was proposed. Considering the independent and incompatible indicators, a comprehensive evaluation method of traffic safety of the visual guiding system in urban tunnels was constructed by using the extension matter-element model. Taking the scene of 4 types of tunnel curves, such as no facilities, horizontal stripe, chevron alignment sign, and LED arch, as examples, the comprehensive evaluation of various schemes were carried out by using simulation tests.
The traffic safety comprehensive evaluation system of visual guiding system in urban tunnels can be analyzed from five aspects: perception reaction, guidance ability, driver factor, driving task, and facility appearance. The results demonstrated significant the comprehensive evaluation result of the target level of scene 1 was L4, scene 2 was L3, scene 3 was L2, and scene 4 was L1. That is, the final results of the comprehensive evaluation of the four scenes were poor, medium, good, and very good, respectively.
In the scheme of visual guiding system for urban tunnel curves, the effectiveness of the three types of designs, from high to low, was the LED arch, chevron alignment sign, and horizontal stripe, and the safety of the scene without facilities was the lowest. Hence, setting the LED arch in the urban tunnel curve has a good effect in the aspects of guidance ability, sight distance, and sight zone, and is conducive to the driver's perception reaction and driving task.
视觉引导系统作为一种通过使用视觉引导设施主动引导安全驾驶的隧道交通安全改善方法,近年来在隧道较多的国家得到了广泛应用。本文旨在定量研究隧道视觉引导系统的交通安全综合评价,具有一定的工程应用价值,可为隧道交通的定量评价和优化设计提供支撑。
基于对城市隧道交通安全相关因素的分析,提出了一个由 5 个上层指标和 12 个基础指标组成的多因素综合评价体系。考虑到独立和不相容的指标,利用可拓物元模型构建了城市隧道视觉引导系统交通安全的综合评价方法。以无设施、水平条纹、楔形导向标志和 LED 拱等 4 种隧道曲线的场景为例,通过模拟试验对各种方案进行了综合评价。
城市隧道视觉引导系统交通安全综合评价体系可以从感知反应、引导能力、驾驶员因素、驾驶任务和设施外观五个方面进行分析。结果表明,目标层场景 1 的综合评价结果为 L4,场景 2 为 L3,场景 3 为 L2,场景 4 为 L1。即四个场景的综合评价最终结果分别为差、中、良、优。
在城市隧道曲线的视觉引导系统方案中,从高到低,三种设计方案的有效性依次为 LED 拱、楔形导向标志和水平条纹,无设施场景的安全性最低。因此,在城市隧道曲线路段设置 LED 拱在引导能力、视距和视区方面效果较好,有利于驾驶员的感知反应和驾驶任务。