Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Norman Borlaug Institute for International Agriculture and Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Adv Nutr. 2024 Aug;15(8):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100255. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
This systematic review and meta-analysis, spanning studies published between 1995 and 2021, investigates various aspects of lunches brought from home (LBFH) to school by children. These meals, in contrast to those provided by the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), lack strict nutritional standards. Despite the availability of NSLP lunches, ∼40% of US children opt for LBFH. This review aims to assess the food content and nutritional quality of LBFH, their adherence to NSLP standards in terms of nutrition and cost, effectiveness of intervention programs designed to enhance their nutritional quality and parental and student perceptions of LBFH. The comprehensive literature search yielded 28 eligible papers, with 16 included in meta-analysis. LBFH commonly include fruits (50%), yet vegetables (17%) and dairy (25%) are less prevalent. They frequently contain snacks (50%), sweets (48%), and sugar-sweetened beverages (31%). Compared with school lunches, LBFH exhibit lower levels of calcium, protein, iron, fiber, and vitamin A, and higher levels of carbohydrates and saturated fat. Intervention programs had no effect on quality of LBFH. On average, LBFH ($1.81) cost slightly less than lunches served at school ($1.98), without accounting for free/reduced-price meals in the calculation. The cost of school lunch for pre-k and kindergarten children became $11.32, nearly 4 times higher than that of LBFH ($2.92), after replicating the meal at home and accounting for meal preparation time. Parents preferred LBFH over school lunches because of concerns related to the quality of school meals served. This study concludes that LBFH are generally less nutritious compared with lunches provided by NSLP. Future research needs to further explore ways to improve parent perception of NSLP. Especially with many states making free meals available to all children, identifying effective ways in promoting and increasing NSLP participation can ensure more children have access to nutritionally balanced and affordable lunches.
本系统评价和荟萃分析,涵盖了 1995 年至 2021 年期间发表的研究,调查了儿童从家中带来的午餐(LBFH)的各个方面。与国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)提供的餐食相比,这些餐食缺乏严格的营养标准。尽管有 NSLP 午餐供应,但仍有约 40%的美国儿童选择 LBFH。本综述旨在评估 LBFH 的食物含量和营养质量,它们在营养和成本方面对 NSLP 标准的遵守情况,旨在提高其营养质量的干预计划的有效性,以及家长和学生对 LBFH 的看法。全面的文献检索产生了 28 篇合格的论文,其中 16 篇纳入荟萃分析。LBFH 通常包括水果(50%),但蔬菜(17%)和奶制品(25%)则不太常见。它们经常包含零食(50%)、糖果(48%)和含糖饮料(31%)。与学校午餐相比,LBFH 钙、蛋白质、铁、纤维和维生素 A 的含量较低,碳水化合物和饱和脂肪的含量较高。干预计划对 LBFH 的质量没有影响。平均而言,LBFH(1.81 美元)的成本略低于学校供应的午餐(1.98 美元),但在计算中未计入免费/降价餐。复制在家中的膳食并考虑到膳食准备时间后,学前班和幼儿园儿童的学校午餐费用达到 11.32 美元,几乎是 LBFH(2.92 美元)的 4 倍。父母更喜欢 LBFH 而不是学校午餐,因为他们对学校提供的膳食质量感到担忧。本研究得出结论,与 NSLP 提供的午餐相比,LBFH 的营养成分通常较低。未来的研究需要进一步探索改善家长对 NSLP 的看法的方法。特别是随着许多州为所有儿童提供免费膳食,确定推广和增加 NSLP 参与度的有效方法可以确保更多儿童能够获得营养均衡且价格合理的午餐。