• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床虚弱量表对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后长期结局的影响。

Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2024 Sep;275:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.017. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.017
PMID:38876408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The semiquantitative Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is reportedly a useful marker for predicting short- and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the long-term prognostic impact of CFS in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed patients undergoing TAVI in Kokura Memorial Hospital using a 9-level CFS and enrolled 1594 patients after excluding patients with CFS 8-9. The patients were divided into the low (CFS level, 1-3; N = 842), intermediate (4; N = 469), and high (5-7; N = 283) groups according to their CFS levels.

RESULTS

In the low, intermediate, and high groups, 3-year all-cause mortality rates were 17.4%, 29.4%, and 41.7% (P < .001) and composite rates of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.1%, 19.1%, and 23.9% (P < .001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that higher frailty was independently associated with all-cause mortality (intermediate group: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.15, P < .001; high group: adjusted HR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.59-2.99, P < .001) and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (intermediate group: adjusted HR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.04-2.08, P = .030; high group: adjusted HR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09-2.51, P = .018) and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and New York Heart Association functional class without significant interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple CFS tool predicts the long-term adverse outcomes post-TAVI.

摘要

背景

据报道,半定量临床虚弱量表(CFS)是预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后短期和中期死亡率的有用标志物。我们评估了 CFS 在接受 TAVI 的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的长期预后影响。

方法

我们前瞻性评估了在小仓纪念医院接受 TAVI 的患者,使用 9 级 CFS,并排除了 CFS 8-9 级的患者后,共纳入 1594 例患者。根据 CFS 水平,患者分为低(CFS 水平 1-3;N=842)、中(4;N=469)和高(5-7;N=283)组。

结果

在低、中、高组,3 年全因死亡率分别为 17.4%、29.4%和 41.7%(P<.001),心血管死亡率和心力衰竭住院的复合率分别为 12.1%、19.1%和 23.9%(P<.001)。多变量分析显示,较高的虚弱程度与全因死亡率独立相关(中组:调整后的危险比[HR],1.63,95%置信区间[CI],1.24-2.15,P<.001;高组:调整后的 HR,2.18,95%CI,1.59-2.99,P<.001)和心血管死亡率和心力衰竭住院的复合终点(中组:调整后的 HR,1.47,95%CI,1.04-2.08,P=0.030;高组:调整后的 HR,1.66,95%CI,1.09-2.51,P=0.018),且该结果一致,无论基于年龄、性别、体重指数、左心室射血分数、胸外科医生评分和纽约心脏协会功能分级的分层,均无显著交互作用。

结论

简单的 CFS 工具可预测 TAVI 后的长期不良结局。

相似文献

1
Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.临床虚弱量表对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后长期结局的影响。
Am Heart J. 2024 Sep;275:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.017. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Long-term prognostic value of the HFPEF score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者 HFPEF 评分的长期预后价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2159-2171. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14773. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Outcomes of Patients at Estimated Low, Intermediate, and High Risk Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis.接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的估计低、中、高风险患者的结局
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;116(12):1916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
4
Long-Term Outcomes for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期预后
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
5
The impact of the development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on the management of severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients: treatment strategies and outcome.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的发展对高危患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄管理的影响:治疗策略与结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(1):80-88. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw211. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
A novel geriatric assessment frailty score predicts 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.一种新的老年综合评估衰弱评分可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 2 年的死亡率。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):153-160. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy044.
7
Red blood cell distribution width as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.红细胞分布宽度作为经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的预后因素。
J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;74(3):212-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 3.
8
Impact of the Clinical Frailty Scale on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.临床虚弱量表对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结局的影响。
Circulation. 2017 May 23;135(21):2013-2024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025630. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
Surgical Risk Scores Applied to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Friends or Foes? Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes From a Single-Center Registry.应用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术风险评分:是友是敌?来自单中心注册研究的短期和长期结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Oct;31(10):E282-E288.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Rehabilitation in TAVI Patients: Safety and Benefits: A Narrative Review.经导管主动脉瓣置入术患者的心脏康复:安全性与益处:一篇叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 1;61(4):648. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040648.