Suppr超能文献

比较腰痛患者和无腰痛患者竖脊肌和臀中肌的厚度和激活情况。

Comparison of erector spinae and gluteus medius muscle thickness and activation in individuals with and without low back pain.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Baylor University Robbins College of Health & Human Sciences, Waco, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jul;39:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.042. Epub 2024 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dysfunctional patterns of the erector spinae (ES) and gluteus medius (GM) muscles often accompany episodes of low back pain (LBP). Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been used to measure ES and GM muscle thickness, however such measurements have not been compared in individuals with and without LBP.

OBJECTIVES

To compare ES and GM muscle thickness and change in thickness utilizing RUSI in individuals with and without LBP.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparison.

METHODS

A volunteer sample of 60 adults with (n = 30) and without (n = 30) LBP was examined. Thickness measurements of the ES and GM at rest and during contraction were obtained by using RUSI during a single session. Statistical comparison was performed using ANCOVA. The demographic variable age was used as a covariate in the primary comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Mean difference for age between groups was 5.4 years (95% CI: 1.85, 8.94, p = 0.004). Average ODI score was 32.33±6.58 and pain level of 5.39±0.73 over the last 24 h in the symptomatic group. There was a statistically significant difference in the percent thickness change in both the ES, mean difference = -3.46 (95% CI: -6.71, -0.21, p = 0.039) and GM, mean difference = -1.93 (95% CI: -3.85, -0.01, p = 0.049) muscles between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with LBP may have reduced percent thickness change of the ES and GM muscles when compared to asymptomatic individuals.

摘要

背景

竖脊肌(ES)和臀中肌(GM)功能障碍模式常伴有下腰痛(LBP)发作。康复超声成像(RUSI)已被用于测量 ES 和 GM 肌肉厚度,但尚未在有和没有 LBP 的个体中进行比较。

目的

比较有和没有 LBP 的个体的 ES 和 GM 肌肉厚度和厚度变化。

设计

横断面比较。

方法

对 60 名有(n=30)和没有(n=30)LBP 的志愿者进行了样本检查。在单次检查中,使用 RUSI 获得 ES 和 GM 在休息和收缩时的厚度测量值。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行统计比较。年龄这一人口统计学变量被用作主要比较分析中的协变量。

结果

两组之间的年龄平均差异为 5.4 岁(95%可信区间:1.85,8.94,p=0.004)。症状组的平均 ODI 评分为 32.33±6.58,过去 24 小时的疼痛水平为 5.39±0.73。ES 的厚度变化百分比有统计学显著差异,平均差异=-3.46(95%可信区间:-6.71,-0.21,p=0.039),GM 的厚度变化百分比也有统计学显著差异,平均差异=-1.93(95%可信区间:-3.85,-0.01,p=0.049)。

结论

与无症状个体相比,有 LBP 的个体的 ES 和 GM 肌肉的厚度变化百分比可能减少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验