Tzelves Lazaros, Talyshinskii Ali, Nedbal Carlotta, Mykoniatis Ioannis, Beisland Christian, Roth Ingunn, Tsaturyan Arman, de Coninck Vincent, Keller Etienne Xavier, Somani Bhaskar K, Juliebø-Jones Patrick
Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Urology and Andrology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Jun 14. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00931-5.
Social media is increasingly used as a platform for patients to explore health care information. Our objective was to study the content on TikTok in order to gain insight into the perspectives shared by the public on vasectomy. A search was performed using the hashtag ´#vasectomy´ on 12.20.2023 and the top 100 video posts from persons self-identifying as patients were included. Using an adaptation of a previously published system, a framework was created for organising and categorising the data related to vasectomy. Domains covered included reason for vasectomy, complications, vasectomy as a controversial topic in society and reference to the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Most content originated from the United States (85.0%) and the median number of views per video was 261 200 (interquartile range (IQR) 8416-1 800 000). In 12.0% of posts, the individual clearly stated that they were under 30 years of age. Two of the commonest topics to be addressed in the videos were recovery (41.0%) and pain (40.0%). 30.0% discussed the reason for undergoing vasectomy. Reasons included women's rights (12%), safety over tubal ligation (5.0%) and desire to be childless (4.0%). 9.0% referred to the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Complications were discussed in 19.0% including vasectomy failure (12.0%). 23.0% contained factually incorrect medical information. 31.0% of videos included the user voicing that vasectomy was considered to be a controversial subject. More than half of the videos (61.0%) were positive regarding the vasectomy process. Our findings reveal that vasectomy receives very high engagement on social media. This study confirms that patients do use it to share their experiences, both positive and negative. Misconceptions regarding this contraception method are common among the public and the urological community should work to address this.
社交媒体越来越多地被用作患者探索医疗保健信息的平台。我们的目标是研究TikTok上的内容,以便深入了解公众对输精管切除术的看法。于2023年12月20日使用标签“#输精管切除术”进行了搜索,纳入了100条自称患者发布的热门视频。采用之前发表的系统进行改编,创建了一个框架,用于组织和分类与输精管切除术相关的数据。涵盖的领域包括输精管切除术的原因、并发症、输精管切除术在社会上作为一个有争议的话题以及对2022年多布斯诉杰克逊裁决的提及。大多数内容来自美国(85.0%),每个视频的观看次数中位数为261200次(四分位间距(IQR)8416 - 1800000)。在12.0%的帖子中,个人明确表示他们年龄在30岁以下。视频中最常讨论的两个话题是恢复(41.0%)和疼痛(40.0%)。30.0%讨论了进行输精管切除术的原因。原因包括女性权利(12%)、比输卵管结扎更安全(5.0%)以及想要无子女(4.0%)。9.0%提到了多布斯诉杰克逊裁决。19.0%讨论了并发症,包括输精管切除术失败(12.0%)。23.0%包含事实错误的医学信息。31.0%的视频包括用户表示输精管切除术被认为是一个有争议的话题。超过一半的视频(61.0%)对输精管切除术过程持积极态度。我们的研究结果表明,输精管切除术在社交媒体上的参与度非常高。这项研究证实,患者确实利用它来分享他们的经历,包括正面和负面的经历。公众对这种避孕方法存在常见的误解,泌尿外科界应努力解决这一问题。