• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国堕胎权联邦保护措施被撤销后,输精管切除术数量不断增加。

Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.

作者信息

Bole Raevti, Lundy Scott D, Pei Evonne, Bajic Petar, Parekh Neel, Vij Sarah C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Case Western School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):265-268. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x
PMID:36788351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9925925/
Abstract

In June 2022 the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case Dobbs v. Jackson that overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling establishing a federally protected right to abortion in the United States. Anecdotal reports suggested increased vasectomy volume following this event; however, no published data exist. We sought to describe trends in vasectomy consultation before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling (referred to as pre- and post-Dobbs herein). Following IRB approval, we reviewed charts of all adults seeking vasectomy consultation in July-August 2021 and July-August 2022 at a large healthcare organization. We then aggregated vasectomy procedural billing data from 2018 to present. The primary outcome was volume of vasectomy consultation appointments and the secondary outcome was number of vasectomies performed. In July-August 2021 (Pre-Dobbs), 116 men attended vasectomy consultation versus 142 men in July-August 2022 (Post-Dobbs). Median age Post-Dobbs was significantly younger than Pre-Dobbs (35 vs 38 years, respectively, p = 0.01) with a significant increase in Post-Dobbs men under 30 seeking vasectomy (p = 0.005). A total of 16.9% (24/142) of Post-Dobbs men were childless, compared to 8.6% (10/116) of Pre-Dobbs men (p = 0.05). Of those with children, median number of offspring was unchanged at 2. Billing data showed a significant increase in vasectomy procedural volumes Post-Dobbs. While overturning Roe v Wade directly impacted female reproductive rights, number of vasectomy consultations and procedures increased significantly following this decision. Younger men, especially those under 30, as well as childless men were significantly more likely to seek consultation Post-Dobbs compared to the prior reproductive legal climate. While longer-term data are needed, findings indicate that men are invested in maintaining reproductive autonomy for themselves and their partners.

摘要

2022年6月,美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案作出裁决,推翻了1973年确立美国联邦保护堕胎权的罗诉韦德案裁决。轶事报道表明,这一事件后输精管切除术数量有所增加;然而,尚无公开数据。我们试图描述多布斯诉杰克逊案裁决前后(本文中称为裁决前和裁决后)输精管切除术咨询的趋势。经机构审查委员会批准后,我们查阅了2021年7月至8月以及2022年7月至8月期间在一家大型医疗保健机构寻求输精管切除术咨询的所有成年人的病历。然后,我们汇总了2018年至今的输精管切除手术计费数据。主要结果是输精管切除术咨询预约数量,次要结果是输精管切除手术数量。2021年7月至8月(裁决前),有116名男性参加了输精管切除术咨询,而2022年7月至8月(裁决后)有142名男性。裁决后男性的中位年龄明显低于裁决前(分别为35岁和38岁,p = 0.01),30岁以下寻求输精管切除术的裁决后男性显著增加(p = 0.005)。裁决后,共有16.9%(24/142)的男性没有子女,而裁决前这一比例为8.6%(10/116)(p = 0.05)。在有子女的男性中,子女数量中位数保持不变,为2个。计费数据显示,裁决后输精管切除手术量显著增加。虽然推翻罗诉韦德案直接影响了女性生殖权利,但这一决定后,输精管切除术咨询和手术数量显著增加。与之前的生殖法律环境相比,年轻男性,尤其是30岁以下的男性以及无子女男性在裁决后寻求咨询的可能性显著更高。虽然需要长期数据,但研究结果表明,男性致力于维护自己和伴侣的生殖自主权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4958/9925925/61769d8cc9c9/41443_2023_672_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4958/9925925/61769d8cc9c9/41443_2023_672_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4958/9925925/61769d8cc9c9/41443_2023_672_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.在美国堕胎权联邦保护措施被撤销后,输精管切除术数量不断增加。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):265-268. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After .比较. 前后的绝育率(包括无子女和无伴侣的情况)。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241260511. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260511.
3
Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following .输精管切除术咨询和手术的短期变化。
Urol Pract. 2024 May;11(3):517-525. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000528. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.罗诉韦德案裁决被推翻后军事医疗系统中的输精管切除术发生率
Int J Impot Res. 2024 May 18. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7.
5
Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database.多布斯案裁决后生殖健康信息寻求行为的变化:维基媒体数据库的系统检索
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Dec 16;4:e64577. doi: 10.2196/64577.
6
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
7
Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.《多布斯案后华盛顿州诊所网络中的堕胎服务提供情况和护理延迟》
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847.
8
Changes in Vasectomy Practice Patterns After Dobbs: A Multi-Institutional Study.多布斯案后输精管切除术实践模式的变化:一项多机构研究
Urol Pract. 2025 Jul;12(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000810. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
9
Seeking vasectomy in post-Dobbs America: the male counterpart response to the reversal of Roe v Wade as evidenced by Google search trends.在美国多布斯案之后寻求输精管切除术:谷歌搜索趋势所显示的男性对罗诉韦德案推翻的对应反应
Fertil Steril. 2022 Dec;118(6):1189. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
10
The Impact of Abortion Laws on the Decision to Undergo Vasectomy.堕胎法对接受输精管切除术决策的影响。
Urology. 2025 Jun;200:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.035. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Vasectomy in real-world clinical practice: an ideal checklist to improve patient experience and outcomes.现实临床实践中的输精管切除术:一份改善患者体验和结局的理想清单。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01158-8.
2
The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review.社交媒体对患者及公众对输精管切除术认知的影响:一项叙述性综述
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01114-6.
3
Temporal trend of vasectomies in Brazil and its regions by age group and race/skin color: a temporal analysis from 2013 to 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Vasectomy: a guidelines-based approach to male surgical contraception.输精管切除术:男性手术避孕的基于指南的方法。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1365-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.045. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 208: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报第 208 号:绝育的益处和风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):e194-e207. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003111.
3
Analysis of urban rural vasectomy demographics: a multi-institutional, retrospective comparison.城乡输精管切除术人口统计学分析:多机构回顾性比较
按年龄组和种族/肤色划分的巴西及其各地区输精管切除术的时间趋势:2013年至2022年的时间分析
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 May 12;34:e20240209. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v34e20240209.en. eCollection 2025.
4
A review of the changing landscape of vasectomy trends in the United States in the post-dobbs era.对多布斯时代后美国输精管切除术趋势变化格局的综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01053-2.
5
Post-vasectomy semen analysis: what is the best protocol?输精管切除术后精液分析:最佳方案是什么?
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01052-3.
6
The review of the long-term health risks associated with vasectomy.对输精管切除术相关长期健康风险的综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01043-4.
7
The Effect of on Clinical Diagnosis of Postpartum Depression.关于产后抑郁症临床诊断的影响。 你提供的原文不完整,“The Effect of on”这里缺少具体内容。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb 26;12(1):86-96. doi: 10.36469/001c.129633. eCollection 2025.
8
Adherence to american urological association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines: a systematic review of current practice among healthcare providers.对美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)输精管切除术指南的遵循情况:对医疗服务提供者当前实践的系统评价
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01023-8.
9
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.
10
Patient-Reported Influence of Sociopolitical Issues on Post-Dobbs Vasectomy Decisions.患者报告的社会政治问题对多布斯案后输精管结扎术决策的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454430. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54430.
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(6):931-934. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.02.
4
Evaluation of Vasectomy Trends in the United States.美国输精管切除术趋势评估
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth.美国输精管切除术使用情况的种族差异:来自全国家庭成长调查的数据。
Urology. 2009 Nov;74(5):1020-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.042. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
6
Tubal sterilization: complications of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy.输卵管绝育术:腹腔镜检查和小切口剖腹术的并发症
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Sep;134(1):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.